IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1315-d1584866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Obstacle Factors of Renewable Energy Substitution Potential in Underdeveloped Rural Areas of China

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng Zhong

    (School of Economics and Management, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 88 Anning West Road, Anning District, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Mingting Shi

    (School of Management, Gansu Agricultural University, 1 Yingmen Village, Anning District, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

The energy consumption structure in underdeveloped rural areas of China has long been dominated by fossil fuels. Such a structure not only makes it difficult to improve the rural living environment but also hinders the stable development of the rural economy. For these regions, improving the living environment is one of the key tasks of China’s rural revitalization strategy. As a clean energy with huge potential, renewable energy can provide a convenient and low-cost solution for the transformation of the energy structure and the improvement of the living environment in these areas. This study takes Gansu Province, a typical underdeveloped region in China, as the research area and uses a multi-objective evaluation analysis model to evaluate the potential for renewable energy substitution at the county scale in rural areas of Gansu Province. Then, through the obstacle factor analysis model, the obstacle factors of the potential for renewable energy substitution are revealed, providing a basis for the scientific formulation of energy policies and the stable development of the rural economy in underdeveloped areas. This study found that the potential for renewable energy substitution in counties of Gansu Province is generally low and shows significant temporal and spatial differences. At the criterion level, the endowment of renewable energy resources constitutes the greatest obstacle, with an average obstacle degree of 8.91%, and shows an upward trend. At the factor level, the obstacle degree of the effective irrigated area is the highest, with an average obstacle degree of 9.29%, and the interannual variation is relatively stable. In addition, the average obstacle degrees of total agricultural machinery power and the number of rural populations are also relatively high. Finally, this paper puts forward policy suggestions, such as rationally planning the development model of renewable energy, coordinating regions to give full play to economic value, and innovatively developing to enhance development capacity, in order to provide reference for relevant decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng Zhong & Mingting Shi, 2025. "Evaluation and Obstacle Factors of Renewable Energy Substitution Potential in Underdeveloped Rural Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1315-:d:1584866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bathala, Ruthvik & G, Hrishikheshan & Rajkumar, Sundararajan & S, Denis Ashok & Jeyaseelan, Thangaraja, 2024. "Experimental investigation, ANN modeling, and TOPSIS optimization of gasoline-alcohol blends for minimizing tailpipe emissions of a motorcycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Guandong Song & Sheng Zhong & Liuguang Song, 2022. "Spatial Pattern Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors in County Economic Resilience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Vijayaraja Loganathan & Dhanasekar Ravikumar & Rupa Kesavan & Kanakasri Venkatesan & Raadha Saminathan & Raju Kannadasan & Mahalingam Sudhakaran & Mohammed H. Alsharif & Zong Woo Geem & Junhee Hong, 2022. "A Case Study on Renewable Energy Sources, Power Demand, and Policies in the States of South India—Development of a Thermoelectric Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Chen, Qiu & Liu, Tianbiao, 2017. "Biogas system in rural China: Upgrading from decentralized to centralized?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 933-944.
    5. Xue, Shengrong & Song, Jinghui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Shang, Zezhou & Sheng, Chenjing & Li, Chongyuan & Zhu, Yufan & Liu, Jingyu, 2020. "A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Tao & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Qiu & Mei, Zili & Pan, Junting & Liu, Hongbin, 2020. "Analysis of revolution in decentralized biogas facilities caused by transition in Chinese rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Song, Jinghui & Wang, Ying & Zhang, Siqi & Song, Yanling & Xue, Shengrong & Liu, Le & Lvy, Xingang & Wang, Xiaojiao & Yang, Gaihe, 2021. "Coupling biochar with anaerobic digestion in a circular economy perspective: A promising way to promote sustainable energy, environment and agriculture development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Zhao, Xiqiang & Zhou, Xing & Wang, Guoxiu & Zhou, Ping & Wang, Wenlong & Song, Zhanlong, 2022. "Evaluating the effect of torrefaction on the pyrolysis of biomass and the biochar catalytic performance on dry reforming of methane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 313-325.
    5. Ni, Ji-Qin, 2024. "A review of household and industrial anaerobic digestion in Asia: Biogas development and safety incidents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Wang, Jun & Xue, Qingwen & Guo, Ting & Mei, Zili & Long, Enshen & Wen, Qian & Huang, Wei & Luo, Tao & Huang, Ruyi, 2018. "A review on CFD simulating method for biogas fermentation material fluid," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 64-73.
    7. Park, Min-Ju & Kim, Hak-Min & Gu, Yun-Jeong & Jeong, Dae-Woon, 2023. "Optimization of biogas-reforming conditions considering carbon formation, hydrogen production, and energy efficiencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    8. Guoliang Zhang & Suhua Lou & Yaowu Wu & Yang Wu & Xiangfeng Wen, 2020. "A New Commerce Operation Model for Integrated Energy System Containing the Utilization of Bio-Natural Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Luo, Erga & Yan, Ru & He, Yaping & Han, Zhen & Feng, Yiyu & Qian, Wenrong & Li, Jinkai, 2024. "Does biogas industrial policy promote the industrial transformation?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Zhang, Weishi & Xu, Ying & Wang, Can & Streets, David G., 2022. "Assessment of the driving factors of CO2 mitigation costs of household biogas systems in China: A LMDI decomposition with cost analysis model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 978-989.
    11. Abbas, Yasir & Yun, Sining & Wang, Ziqi & Zhang, Yongwei & Zhang, Xianmei & Wang, Kaijun, 2021. "Recent advances in bio-based carbon materials for anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    12. Mingting Shi & Shenao Ma & Sheng Zhong, 2025. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Obstacle Factor Analysis of Rural Modernization Development Level in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Tavera-Ruiz, C. & Martí-Herrero, J. & Mendieta, O. & Jaimes-Estévez, J. & Gauthier-Maradei, P. & Azimov, U. & Escalante, H. & Castro, L., 2023. "Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Mei Yang & Mengyun Jiao & Jinyu Zhang, 2022. "Research on Urban Resilience and Influencing Factors of Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Su, Xing & Shao, Xiaolu & Geng, Yining & Tian, Shaochen & Huang, Yixiang, 2022. "Optimization of feedstock and insulating strategies to enhance biogas production of solar-assisted biodigester system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 59-68.
    16. Wang, Xuemei & Yan, Rui & Zhao, Yuying & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Yang, Shuo & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Li, Zifu, 2020. "Biogas standard system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1265-1273.
    17. Niu, Shuwen & Li, Zhen & Qiu, Xin & Dai, Runqi & Wang, Xiang & Qiang, Wenli & Hong, Zhenguo, 2019. "Measurement of effective energy consumption in China's rural household sector and policy implication," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 553-564.
    18. Jiapei Wei & Gefu Liang & James Alex & Tongchao Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2020. "Research Progress of Energy Utilization of Agricultural Waste in China: Bibliometric Analysis by Citespace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Yiyun Liu & Jun Wu & Jianjun Li & Jingjing Huang, 2023. "The Diffusion Rule of Demand-Oriented Biogas Supply in Distributed Renewable Energy System: An Evolutionary Game-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Peng Cao & Haijun Tao, 2024. "Sustainable Development in Gansu Province: Theil Index and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1315-:d:1584866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.