IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9434-d1778335.html

An Integrated Approach to the Development and Implementation of New Technological Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Plinta

    (Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, Willowa 2, 43-309 Bielsko-Biała, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Radwan

    (Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, Willowa 2, 43-309 Bielsko-Biała, Poland)

Abstract

Dynamic technological changes and the variability of market requirements pose significant challenges for modern manufacturing companies in the effective development and implementation of new technological solutions. The aim of the research was to develop an integrated approach covering all key stages of implementation—from formulating technological solutions, through selecting and evaluating variants, to preparing and managing production processes—under the conditions of a medium-sized manufacturing company specializing in the batch production of steel constructions. The analysis was based on an interdisciplinary approach, combining methods of creative design of new technological solutions, including Blue Ocean Strategy, value proposition design, and QFD methodology, with analytical approaches that include multi-criteria evaluation of solution variants, technical preparation of production, as well as the organization and management of production processes in modified organizational conditions. This approach enabled a comprehensive assessment of the developed solutions, taking into account both their operational potential and practical feasibility in realistic implementation conditions, through the use of case studies and simulations to validate the results. The results of the research indicate that integrating methods for creating new solutions with analytical assessment and simulation tools leads to a more precise and data-driven approach to process design, enabling better decision-making based on thorough analysis and predictive modeling. Furthermore, this approach allows for a significant reduction in the risk of implementation failure through early identification of potential problems. The conclusion of the study confirms that a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach to the implementation of new technologies ensures better alignment with customer demands, reduces production downtime, and enhances product optimization and resource utilization, which are critical factors in building a sustainable competitive advantage for manufacturing companies. The proposed approach enables more deliberate design and organization of manufacturing processes, supporting their flexible adaptation to changing market and technological conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Plinta & Katarzyna Radwan, 2025. "An Integrated Approach to the Development and Implementation of New Technological Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9434-:d:1778335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9434/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9434/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed A. Hajar & Ammar Ahmed Alkahtani & Daing Nasir Ibrahim & Mohd Ridzuan Darun & Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi & Sieh Kiong Tiong, 2021. "The Approach of Value Innovation towards Superior Performance, Competitive Advantage, and Sustainable Growth: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-33, September.
    2. Henryk Wojtaszek & Ireneusz Miciuła, 2019. "Analysis of Factors Giving the Opportunity for Implementation of Innovations on the Example of Manufacturing Enterprises in the Silesian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Cooper, Robert G., 1990. "Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 44-54.
    4. Hazem Ali & Ting Chen & Yunhong Hao, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Practices, Competitive Capabilities, and Sustainable Performance: Moderating Role of Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Claudio Sassanelli & Sergio Terzi, 2022. "Building the Value Proposition of a Digital Innovation Hub Network to Support Ecosystem Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Adam Sulich, 2020. "Between Sustainable and Temporary Competitive Advantages in the Unstable Business Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Onufrey, Ksenia & Bergek, Anna, 2021. "Transformation in a mature industry: The role of business and innovation strategies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Varun Gupta & Jose Maria Fernandez-Crehuet & Thomas Hanne, 2020. "Fostering Continuous Value Proposition Innovation through Freelancer Involvement in Software Startups: Insights from Multiple Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-35, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfgang Drobetz & Lars Hornuf & Paul P. Momtaz & Niclas Schermann, 2025. "Token-Based Crowdfunding: Investor Choice and the Optimal Timing of Initial Coin Offerings," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(1), pages 232-282, January.
    2. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    3. Ferrigno, Giulio & Barabuffi, Saverio & Marcazzan, Enrico & Piccaluga, Andrea, 2025. "What “V” of the big data support firms’ radical and incremental innovation?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    4. Bookhagen, Andrea & Sperber, Sonja, 2017. "Kundenintegration in den Entwicklungsprozess von Produktinnovationen durch Crowdsourcing," PraxisWissen - German Journal of Marketing, AfM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Marketing, vol. 2(01/2017), pages 21-37.
    5. Pravee Kruachottikul & Pinnaree Tea-makorn & Poomsiri Dumrongvute & Solaphat Hemrungrojn & Natawut Nupairoj & Ornsiree Junchaya & Sukrit Vinayavekhin, 2024. "MediGate: a MedTech product innovation development process from university research to successful commercialization within emerging markets," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-43, December.
    6. Sophie Hooge & Milena Klasing Chen & Dominique Laousse, 2019. "Managing the emergence of concepts in fuzzy front end: a framework of strategic performance and emerging process of innovation briefs," Post-Print hal-02167857, HAL.
    7. Andreas Kallmuenzer & Andreas Strobl & Mike Peters, 2018. "Tweaking the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in family firms: the effect of control mechanisms and family-related goals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 855-883, October.
    8. Takey, Silvia Mayumi & Carvalho, Marly M., 2016. "Fuzzy front end of systemic innovations: A conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 97-109.
    9. Da Mota de Pina E Cunha, A.M., 1998. "Determinants of Product Innovation in Organizations : Practices and Performance in the Portugese Financial Sector," Other publications TiSEM e6e4e56e-b72a-4392-8d79-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Nicolas Ricci & Sophie Hooge, 2024. "Caractériser la diversité des processus de création dans les Industries Culturelles et Créatives : une analyse qualitative comparée des régimes de conception créatifs," Post-Print hal-04759786, HAL.
    11. Sora Lee & Jaewon Yoo, 2021. "Determinants of a Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Focused on Korean Small Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Paris Chrysos, 2018. "Empathy in the business model: how Facebook and Google Maps manage external problem-solving processes," Working Papers halshs-01897205, HAL.
    13. Ivona Huđek & Polona Tominc & Karin Širec, 2021. "The Human Capital of the Freelancers and Their Satisfaction with the Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Lukasz Kuzminski & Michal Nadolny & Henryk Wojtaszek, 2020. "An Innovative Approach to Generational Motivation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 679-692.
    15. Paola Criscuolo & Linus Dahlander & Thorsten Grohsjean & Ammon Salter, 2021. "The Sequence Effect in Panel Decisions: Evidence from the Evaluation of Research and Development Projects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 987-1008, July.
    16. Alex Burnap & John R. Hauser & Artem Timoshenko, 2023. "Product Aesthetic Design: A Machine Learning Augmentation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1029-1056, November.
    17. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2:p:536-547 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Miikka Blomster & Timo Koivumäki, 2022. "Exploring the resources, competencies, and capabilities needed for successful machine learning projects in digital marketing," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 123-169, March.
    19. Joanna Holub-Iwan & Teresa Kupczyk & Grzegorz Debita & Piotr Rupa, 2021. "Leadership and Effectiveness of Incubation of Start-Ups: Research Scheme for Next Generation Stage Gate," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 797-818.
    20. Klessova, Svetlana & Engell, Sebastian & Thomas, Catherine, 2022. "Assessment of the advancement of market-upstream innovations and of the performance of research and innovation projects," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    21. Tomasz Zema & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Models of Electricity Price Forecasting: Bibliometric Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9434-:d:1778335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.