IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9396-d1777408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Combined AHP–TOPSIS-Based Decision Support System for Highway Pavement Type Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Onur Sahin

    (Civil Engineering Faculty, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Turkey)

  • Berna Aksoy

    (Civil Engineering Faculty, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Turkey)

Abstract

In Turkey, flexible pavement containing bituminous material is widely preferred on highways. Rigid pavement, which is based on concrete, is generally used in small-scale, specific projects. This situation, which has arisen due to historical and technical reasons, has also brought with it certain prejudices against rigid pavement applications. A review of the literature reveals that many factors influence the choice of highway pavement type, but decision-makers tend to make their selection based on the most important factors, disregarding other parameters. The lack of a systematic factor analysis is a shortcoming in this regard. In this research, a combined multi-criteria decision-making study was conducted, including the neglected factors, to address this technical deficiency in the pavement type selection process. Through detailed analysis, parameters likely to influence pavement type selection were identified and analyzed using the hybrid AHP-TOPSIS approach, guided by the opinions of experts in the field. The analysis shows that comfort (user ride quality), financial, and environmental factors are the most effective main criteria, while maintenance and repair costs, eco-friendliness, and initial construction costs were identified as the most critical sub-criteria influencing the choice of pavement type. Based on the analysis results, a detailed decision support system was presented to decision-makers according to the characteristics of the alternatives obtained. The results highlight the need for decision-making frameworks that prioritize both long-term cost efficiency and user safety, contributing to more sustainable and resilient pavement applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Onur Sahin & Berna Aksoy, 2025. "A Combined AHP–TOPSIS-Based Decision Support System for Highway Pavement Type Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9396-:d:1777408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 1987. "Risk—Its Priority and Probability: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 159-172, June.
    2. Madjid Tavana & Mehdi Soltanifar & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2023. "Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 879-907, July.
    3. Jana Stofkova & Matej Krejnus & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Vladimira Binasova, 2022. "Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Xiao-ling Yang & Jie-hua Ding & Hui Hou, 2013. "Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(2), pages 657-674, September.
    5. Irina Canco & Drita Kruja & Tiberiu Iancu, 2021. "AHP, a Reliable Method for Quality Decision Making: A Case Study in Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauro Iacono & Michele Mastroianni & Christian Riccio & Bruna Viscardi, 2025. "A Framework for Data Lifecycle Model Selection," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Qi Wei & Rui Wang & Chuan-Yang Ruan, 2024. "Similarity Measures of Probabilistic Interval Preference Ordering Sets and Their Applications in Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Sandija Zeverte-Rivza & Laura Girdziute & Agnieszka Parlińska & Peteris Rivza & Anastasija Novikova & Ina Gudele, 2023. "Digitalisation in Bioeconomy in the Baltic States and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Sueun Jung & Jihyun Lee, 2023. "Exploring a Conceptual Framework of Koreans’ Residential Satisfaction Based on Maslow’s Human Needs: A Qualitative and Quantitative Integrated Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-40, September.
    5. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg, 2021. "Entscheidungen, Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Immobilienwirtschaft: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Decisions, decision-making and decisions support systems in r," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, April.
    6. Marios Tsioufis & Antonios Fytopoulos & Dimitra Kalaitzi & Thomas A. Alexopoulos, 2024. "Discovering maritime-piracy hotspots: a study based on AHP and spatio-temporal analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(2), pages 861-883, April.
    7. Haibo Hu & Miao Yu & Xiya Zhang & Ying Wang, 2024. "Performance benchmarking on several regression models applied in urban flash flood risk assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(4), pages 3487-3504, March.
    8. Goraj, Rafał & Kiciński, Marcin & Ślefarski, Rafał & Duczkowska, Anna, 2023. "Validity of decision criteria for selecting power-to-gas projects in Poland," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Amalia Kouskoura & Eleni Kalliontzi & Dimitris Skalkos & Ioannis Bakouros, 2025. "Analysis of Results of Experts’ Perspectives of Sustainable Regional Competitiveness Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Multi-Criteria Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
    10. Rusche, Simon & Weissflog., Jan & Wenninger, Simon & Häckel, Björn, 2023. "How flexible are energy flexibilities? Developing a flexibility score for revenue and risk analysis in industrial demand-side management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Joshua Ngetuny & Tobias Baldauf & Wilfried Zörner, 2025. "Optimizing Feedstock Selection for Sustainable Small-Scale Biogas Systems Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Ashraf Abdelkarim & Mohamed Hssan Hassan Abdelhafez & Khaled Elkhayat & Mohammad Alshenaifi & Sultan Alfraidi & Ali Aldersoni & Ghazy Albaqawy & Amer Aldamaty & Ayman Ragab, 2024. "Spatial Suitability Index for Sustainable Urban Development in Desert Hinterland Using a Geographical-Information-System-Based Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-37, July.
    13. Alena Pauliková & Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Monika Ubárová, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Human–Cobot Collaborative Manufacturing Implementation on the Occupational Health and Safety and the Quality Requirements," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Sharvini, Siva Raman & Stringer, Lindsay C., 2025. "Challenges and solutions for food waste-based biogas in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    15. Jun Zhou & Tang-fei Hu & Zhengqi Wei & Dandan Ji, 2025. "Evaluation of High-Quality Development Level of Regional Economy and Exploration of Index Obstacle Degree: A Case Study of Henan Province," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 10566-10598, June.
    16. Ruohan Ma & Zhiying Wang & Lemei Zhu & Anbang Zhang & Yiwen Wang, 2025. "A Social Network Group Decision-Making Method for Flood Disaster Chains Considering Evolutionary Trends and Decision-Makers’ Risk Preferences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.
    17. Muamer Abuzwidah & Ahmed Elawady & Ayat Gamal Ashour & Abdullah Gokhan Yilmaz & Abdallah Shanableh & Waleed Zeiada, 2024. "Flood Risk Assessment for Sustainable Transportation Planning and Development under Climate Change: A GIS-Based Comparative Analysis of CMIP6 Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Jiao Li & Gaoyuan Hu & Fei Wang, 2025. "Evaluating China’s National Park Pilots: Constructing an Indicator System for Performance Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-49, October.
    19. Mimica R. Milošević & Miloš M. Nikolić & Dušan M. Milošević & Violeta Dimić, 2022. "Managing Resources Based on Influential Indicators for Sustainable Economic Development: A Case Study in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Cembranel, Priscila & Teixeira Dias, Felipe & Silva, Camilla Gomes da & Finatto, Carla Patricia & Guerra, José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade, 2023. "Sustainable universities: The LGBTQIAP+ inclusive model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9396-:d:1777408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.