IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9357-d1776575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Social Initiatives in Shaping Sustainable Business Outcomes—Insights from Organizations Operating in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Walecka-Jankowska

    (Faculty of Management, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Barbara Wasilewska

    (Faculty of Production Engineering and Logistics, Opole University of Technology, 45-758 Opole, Poland)

  • Adam Wasilewski

    (Faculty of Management, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

This article addresses the contemporary and highly relevant research area of business sustainability, which attracts the attention of both scholars and management practitioners. Although the social dimension of sustainability is gaining increasing importance, there remains a research gap regarding the extent to which social initiatives contribute to sustainable outcomes. This study specifically focuses on the social dimension of business sustainability. The primary objective of the study is to examine the relationship between activities within the social dimension and sustainable outcomes. Moreover the study extends earlier research by contributing new empirical evidence from the Polish context, thereby enriching the existing body of knowledge. The study encompasses 303 organizations operating in Poland and utilizes a questionnaire-based survey. The collected data were employed to construct a regression model. The results indicate statistically significant relationships between social outcomes and key variables, namely, societal values and employee-related outcomes. The results indicate that social value creation and value chain integration are the strongest predictors of sustainable outcomes The variables were measured using subjective indicators. In addition, the research was conducted only in companies operating in Poland, and the results may be typical of businesses operating in this country. Therefore, the research should be extended to other countries, and it would be particularly interesting to compare with companies operating in countries where sustainability-related indicators are highly rated. It would also be very interesting to expand the data gained through questionnaires through interviews and case studies, linking social-focused business activities to the benefits that businesses can achieve in the area of sustainable outcomes as a result.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Walecka-Jankowska & Barbara Wasilewska & Adam Wasilewski, 2025. "The Role of Social Initiatives in Shaping Sustainable Business Outcomes—Insights from Organizations Operating in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9357-:d:1776575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob Brower & Vijay Mahajan, 2013. "Driven to Be Good: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on the Drivers of Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 313-331, October.
    2. Arnaldo Camuffo & Federica Stefano & Chiara Paolino, 2017. "Safety Reloaded: Lean Operations and High Involvement Work Practices for Sustainable Workplaces," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 245-259, June.
    3. Samir Mili & Tasnim Loukil, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainability with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas: Insights from the Fruit and Vegetable Industry in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    5. Sultan Alaswad Alenazi & Tawfeeq Mohammed Alanazi, 2023. "The Mediating Role of Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities in the Effect of Social Customer Relationship Management on Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Study on SMEs in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Yoon-Jung Jang & Eojina Kim, 2023. "Social and Personal Norms in Shaping Customers’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior in Restaurants’ Social Media Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Obaid Mobarak Al-Shuridah & Nelson Oly Ndubisi, 2023. "The Effect of Sustainability Orientation on CRM Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Ye Feng & Rabia Akram & Vu Minh Hieu & Nguyen Hoang Tien, 2022. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on the sustainable financial performance of Italian firms: mediating role of firm reputation," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 4740-4758, December.
    9. Thanh Tiep Le & X.V. Vo & V.G. Venkatesh, 2022. "Role of Green Innovation and Supply Chain Management in Driving Sustainable Corporate Performance," Post-Print hal-04452852, HAL.
    10. Zi Mu & Yifei Li & Hadi Hussain, 2024. "Sustainability Beyond Profits: Assessing the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Strategic Business Performance in Hospitality Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Mariusz Salwin & Ilona Jacyna-Gołda & Andrzej Kraslawski & Aneta Ewa Waszkiewicz, 2022. "The Use of Business Model Canvas in the Design and Classification of Product-Service Systems Design Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Sui-Hua Yu & Wan-Chen Liang, 2020. "Exploring the Determinants of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Examination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Michael O. Erdiaw‐Kwasie & Khorshed Alam & Enamul Kabir, 2017. "Modelling Corporate Stakeholder Orientation: Does the Relationship Between Stakeholder Background Characteristics and Corporate Social Performance Matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 465-479, May.
    14. Stavroula (Vivi) Mixafenti & Aristi Karagkouni & Dimitrios Dimitriou, 2025. "Integrating Business Ethics into Occupational Health and Safety: An Evaluation Framework for Sustainable Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Fordham, Anne Elizabeth & Robinson, Guy M. & Blackwell, Boyd Dirk, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility in resource companies – Opportunities for developing positive benefits and lasting legacies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 366-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Stork & Rolf Morgenstern & Bernd Pölling & Jan-Henning Feil, 2023. "Holistic Business Model Conceptualisation—Capturing Sustainability Contributions Illustrated by Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Esther Agyeiwaa Owusu & Lulin Zhou & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Francis Atta Sarpong & Francisca Arboh, 2024. "Fostering Environmental Performance Via Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Innovation Initiatives: Examining the Moderating Influence of Competitive Advantage," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    3. Karin Tollin & Lars Bech Christensen, 2019. "Sustainability Marketing Commitment: Empirical Insights About Its Drivers at the Corporate and Functional Level of Marketing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 1165-1185, June.
    4. Danlei Feng & Haixia Wang & Lingdi Zhao, 2025. "Digital Technologies for Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: Source-Push and Value Chain-Pull Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Marina Dabić & Jane Maley & Leo-Paul Dana & Ivan Novak & Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Andrea Caputo, 2020. "Pathways of SME internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 705-725, October.
    6. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    7. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Lirios Alos-Simo & Antonio J. Verdu-Jover & Jose M. Gomez-Gras, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer in Sustainable Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Periods of Financial Recession and Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Emre Yildiz, H. & Murtic, Adis & Klofsten, Magnus & Zander, Udo & Richtnér, Anders, 2021. "Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Christiana Müller & Stefan Vorbach, 2015. "Enabling Business Model Change: Evidence from High-Technology Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 53-75.
    11. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Fernando Úbeda, 2022. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 875-900, June.
    13. Giovanni Gavetti & Constance E. Helfat & Luigi Marengo, 2017. "Searching, Shaping, and the Quest for Superior Performance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 194-209, September.
    14. Scherrer, Aline & Rogge, Karoline S., 2025. "When do incumbents adopt radical net-zero technologies? Analysing differences in strategy trajectories of European truck manufacturers towards alternative vehicle technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    15. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    16. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    17. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    18. Fang Li & Sheng Zhang & Yuhuan Jin, 2018. "Sustainability of University Technology Transfer: Mediating Effect of Inventor’s Technology Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Francisco Gustavo Bautista Carrillo & Daniel Arias-Aranda, 2025. "Technological Adoption Sequences and Sustainable Innovation Performance: A Longitudinal Analysis of Optimal Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9357-:d:1776575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.