IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9279-d1774847.html

Life Cycle Assessment of PLM System Scenarios: Sensitivity Insights from an Academic Use Case

Author

Listed:
  • Mathis Cuzin

    (Laboratoire de Conception de Produit et d’Innovation, LCPI, EA 3927, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, F-75013 Paris, France
    Capgemini Engineering R&D, F-92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France)

  • Antoine Mallet

    (Capgemini Engineering R&D, F-31100 Toulouse, France)

  • Kevin Nocentini

    (Capgemini Engineering R&D, F-06616 Antibes, France)

  • Benjamin Deguilhem

    (Capgemini Engineering R&D, F-31100 Toulouse, France)

  • Victor Fau

    (Capgemini Engineering R&D, F-31100 Toulouse, France)

  • Tom Bauer

    (Bordeaux INP, I2M, UMR 5295, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, France
    Bordeaux INP, I2M, UMR 5295, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, F-73375 Chambéry, France)

  • Philippe Véron

    (Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Physiques Et Numériques, LISPEN, EA 7515, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, F-13617 Aix-en-Provence, France)

  • Frédéric Segonds

    (Laboratoire de Conception de Produit et d’Innovation, LCPI, EA 3927, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, F-75013 Paris, France)

Abstract

The 2020s represent both the digital decade and the pivotal period in the fulfillment of long-standing commitments made by public, private, and institutional actors in favor of sustainable development. In the manufacturing context, Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems are used during the design phase to reduce product environmental footprint. However, only a few studies have thoroughly identified the environmental impacts associated with these technological solutions. This study proposes a sensitivity analysis of five environmental impact categories associated with two PLM system architectures and three mitigation scenarios. To this end, we use an engineering school as a representative PLM system case study, relying on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology and leveraging specialized tools that enable the execution and comparative analysis of multiple LCA scenarios. Our results consistently identify the manufacturing and usage phases of PLM system users’ equipment as the main contributors of the PLM system to climate change, acidification, and the depletion of abiotic mineral and metal resources. End-of-life contributes significantly to particulate matter impact, and usage phase, in a nuclear mix country, to ionizing radiation. The policy of purchasing and reselling reconditioned users’ equipment is clearly identified as a key lever for reducing the magnitude of these five environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathis Cuzin & Antoine Mallet & Kevin Nocentini & Benjamin Deguilhem & Victor Fau & Tom Bauer & Philippe Véron & Frédéric Segonds, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment of PLM System Scenarios: Sensitivity Insights from an Academic Use Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-37, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9279-:d:1774847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan C. T. Bieser & Lorenz M. Hilty, 2018. "Assessing Indirect Environmental Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT): A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Nils Thonemann & Anna Schulte & Daniel Maga, 2020. "How to Conduct Prospective Life Cycle Assessment for Emerging Technologies? A Systematic Review and Methodological Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Sala, Serenella & Ciuffo, Biagio & Nijkamp, Peter, 2015. "A systemic framework for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-325.
    4. Cédric Gossart, 2015. "Rebound effects and ICT : a review of the literature," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01258112, HAL.
    5. Joanna Helman & Maria Rosienkiewicz & Mariusz Cholewa & Mateusz Molasy & Sylwester Oleszek, 2023. "Towards GreenPLM—Key Sustainable Indicators Selection and Assessment Method Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Mariane Bigarelli Ferreira & Giulihano Luis Feltz Zeni & Guilherme Francisco do Prado & Jovani Taveira Souza & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Fabio Neves Puglieri, 2025. "Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainability in the Digital Product Lifecycle: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Mariusz Cholewa & Luan Huynh Ba Minh, 2021. "PLM Solutions in the Process of Supporting the Implementation and Maintenance of the Circular Economy Concept in Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Canavati, Anne & Toweh, Jayson & Simon, Adam C. & Arbic, Brian K., 2022. "The world’s electronic graveyard: What is the solution to Ghana’s e-waste dilemma?," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lange, Steffen & Pohl, Johanna & Santarius, Tilman, 2020. "Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich & El Benni, Nadja & Douziech, Mélanie, 2025. "Implementing responsible research and innovation and sustainability assessment in research projects: A framework and application," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    3. Parolin, Giácomo & McAloone, Tim C. & Pigosso, Daniela C.A., 2024. "How can technology assessment tools support sustainable innovation? A systematic literature review and synthesis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    4. Olivera Kostoska & Ljupco Kocarev, 2019. "A Novel ICT Framework for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Nicolas Moreau & Thibault Pirson & Grégoire Le Brun & Thibault Delhaye & Georgiana Sandu & Antoine Paris & David Bol & Jean-Pierre Raskin, 2021. "Could Unsustainable Electronics Support Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-7, June.
    6. Parul Bhyan & Bhavna Shrivastava & Nand Kumar, 2023. "Systematic literature review of life cycle sustainability assessment system for residential buildings: using bibliometric analysis 2000–2020," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 13637-13665, December.
    7. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Ferreira, Ana & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & de Brito, Jorge & Mateus, Ricardo, 2018. "Combined carbon and energy intensity benchmarks for sustainable retail stores," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 877-889.
    9. Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Augustín Stareček & Dagmar Cagáňová & Martin Fero & Miloš Čambál, 2019. "Perceived Serviceability of Outplacement Programs as a Part of Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    11. Ana Salomé García-Muñiz & María Rosalía Vicente, 2021. "The Effects of Informational Feedback on the Energy Consumption of Online Services: Some Evidence for the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Muhammad Riaz & Wojciech Sałabun & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Nawazish Ali & Jarosław Wątróbski, 2020. "A Robust q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information Aggregation Using Einstein Operations with Application to Sustainable Energy Planning Decision Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-39, May.
    13. Abdallah Alaoui & Moritz Hallama & Roger Bär & Ioanna Panagea & Felicitas Bachmann & Carola Pekrun & Luuk Fleskens & Ellen Kandeler & Rudi Hessel, 2022. "A New Framework to Assess Sustainability of Soil Improving Cropping Systems in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Maharjan, Prapti & Hauck, Mara & Kirkels, Arjan & Buettner, Benjamin & de Coninck, Heleen, 2024. "Deriving experience curves: A structured and critical approach applied to PV sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    15. Khalifa Mohammed Al-Sobai & Shaligram Pokharel & Galal M. Abdella, 2020. "Perspectives on the Capabilities for the Selection of Strategic Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Chien, Fengsheng & Anwar, Ahsan & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Sharif, Arshian & Razzaq, Asif & Sinha, Avik, 2021. "The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Oriana Gava & Fabio Bartolini & Francesca Venturi & Gianluca Brunori & Angela Zinnai & Alberto Pardossi, 2018. "A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Gina Cristina Dimian & Mihaela Maftei & Josef Jablonský & Erika Marin & Stelian Mircea Olaru, 2026. "The Influence of Digitalization on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union. The Analysis of Mediating Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 1888-1928, February.
    19. David Tremblay & François Fortier & Jean‐François Boucher & Olivier Riffon & Claude Villeneuve, 2020. "Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1584-1596, November.
    20. Joan Hereu-Morales & César Valderrama, 2022. "Towards a Sustainability-Based Society: An Analysis of Fundamental Values from the Perspective of Economics and Philosophy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9279-:d:1774847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.