IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9135-d1771906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tendencies in Green Surface Design in Contemporary Remodels of Market Squares: The Example of Lesser Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Langer

    (Faculty of Architecture, Krakow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

  • Tomasz Bajwoluk

    (Faculty of Architecture, Krakow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study on manners of green area design, with green areas understood as areas with biologically vital surfaces, in the context of contemporary remodelling of historical market squares. This study approaches this problem comprehensively with the example of Lesser Poland—a region in southern Poland. The presented detailed analysis covers cities and towns where a major town or city square was remodelled in the period between 2009 and 2024. The findings of this study of these spaces’ development—both before and after the completion of their respective remodelling projects—have been presented as comparative diagrams. Based on this, essential quantitative parameters linked to green area surface area and the biologically vital area to square ratio were calculated for the pre- and post-remodel stages. Interpreting the findings enabled the identification of the quantitative changes that occurred during the remodelling of each square, and thus outlining of the general tendencies in the design of greenery in these spaces. Research shows that the process of redevelopment of urban markets most often results in a reduction in green space, regardless of its initial condition. In some cases, this phenomenon becomes radical, leading to the almost complete elimination of green spaces from the market square. We compared our findings with those of other studies on the remodelling and redevelopment of the city centres of Polish cities and referred to the literature on diagnosing the phenomenon dubbed as ‘concretosis’ ( betonoza in Polish). We also discussed this tendency in the context of the revitalisation of city centres and the programming of functions that city market squares feature after remodelling, as well as the specificities of Polish law in terms of requirements in the planning and design of public spaces. This study’s subject matter also references the general tendencies in planning downtown public spaces that are often historic and which are highly distinct and attractive places in numerous cities and towns around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Langer & Tomasz Bajwoluk, 2025. "Tendencies in Green Surface Design in Contemporary Remodels of Market Squares: The Example of Lesser Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9135-:d:1771906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivia S. Horte & Theodore S. Eisenman, 2020. "Urban Greenways: A Systematic Review and Typology," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Munyati, C. & Drummond, J.H., 2020. "Loss of urban green spaces in Mafikeng, South Africa," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    3. Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir & Ayyoob Sharifi & Mohammad Hajian Hossein Abadi & Zahra Moradi, 2023. "From Garden City to 15-Minute City: A Historical Perspective and Critical Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Beata Meyer, 2023. "Use of Green and Water Areas in the Process of City Image Creation on the Example of Szczecin," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 553-562.
    5. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Beata Płoszaj-Witkowska, 2022. "Transformation of Green Areas in Central Squares after Revitalization: Evidence from Cittaslow Towns in Northeast Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Tomasz Bajwoluk & Piotr Langer, 2023. "The Pocket Park and Its Impact on the Quality of Urban Space on the Local and Supralocal Scale—Case Study of Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Beata Fornal-Pieniak & Dagmara Stangierska-Mazurkiewicz & Filip Kamionowski & Katarzyna Widera & Barbara Żarska & Piotr Latocha, 2024. "Preferences of Adults for Synanthropic Flora in the Sustainable Development of Polish Cities’ Green Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-12, April.
    8. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Katarina Kristianova & Ewelina Pochodyła & Jan K. Kazak & Krzysztof Młynarczyk, 2021. "Revitalization of Public Spaces in Cittaslow Towns: Recent Urban Redevelopment in Central Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Elizelle Juanee Cilliers & Wim Timmermans & Frans Van den Goorbergh & Jimmie Slijkhuis, 2015. "Green Place-making in Practice: From Temporary Spaces to Permanent Places," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 349-366, July.
    10. Bolund, Per & Hunhammar, Sven, 1999. "Ecosystem services in urban areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 293-301, May.
    11. Michelle C. Kondo & Jaime M. Fluehr & Thomas McKeon & Charles C. Branas, 2018. "Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui, Ling Chui & Jim, C.Y., 2022. "Urban-greenery demands are affected by perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices, and socio-demographic and environmental-cultural factors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Sebastian Bernat & Małgorzata Flaga, 2022. "Cittàslow as An Alternative Path of Town Development and Revitalisation in Peripheral Areas: The Example of The Lublin Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Zene Combrinck & Elizelle Juanee Cilliers & Louis Lategan & Sarel Cilliers, 2020. "Revisiting the Proximity Principle with Stakeholder Input: Investigating Property Values and Distance to Urban Green Space in Potchefstroom," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Angeliki T. Paraskevopoulou & Marina Chletsou & Chrysovalantis Malesios, 2022. "Runners Experience Lower Heart Rate, Increased Speed, and Joy/Calm on Routes with Trees, by the Sea and through Parks: Implications for Climate Change Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Goran Krsnik & Sonia Reyes-Paecke & Keith M. Reynolds & Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo & José Ramón González Olabarria, 2023. "Assessing Relativeness in the Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services: Better Comparison Methods for Improved Well-Being," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Léa Mukubu Pika & Serge Mugisho Mukotanyi & David Pyame Onyo & Aloïse Bitagirwa Ndele & Joël Mobunda Tiko & Julien Bwazani Balandi & Kouagou Raoul Sambieni & Jean Pierre Meniko To Hulu & Jean-François, 2025. "Plant Diversity of Concessions Held by Catholic Religious Groups in Three Cities of the Democratic Republic of the Congo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Katarina Kristianova & Natalia Małkowska & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Alexander V. Rusanov, 2019. "Dacha dwellers and gardeners: garden plots and second homes in Europe and Russia," Population and Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 3(1), pages 107-124, April.
    10. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Hayriye Sengun & Adnan Kara, 2021. "Cittaslow: Umbrella branding for Turkish cities," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 81-90, July.
    13. Amber L. Pearson & Victoria Breeze & Aaron Reuben & Gwen Wyatt, 2021. "Increased Use of Porch or Backyard Nature during COVID-19 Associated with Lower Stress and Better Symptom Experience among Breast Cancer Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Malik, Khyati & Kim, Sowon & Cultice, Brian J., 2023. "The impact of remote work on green space values in regional housing markets," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Fei Qin & Yiqing Song & George P Nassis & Lina Zhao & Yanan Dong & Cuicui Zhao & Yiwei Feng & Jiexiu Zhao, 2020. "Physical Activity, Screen Time, and Emotional Well-Being during the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Ahmet Tolunay & Çağlar Başsüllü, 2015. "Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-Benefits of Forests in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, March.
    17. A. Haven Kiers & Billy Krimmel & Caroline Larsen-Bircher & Kate Hayes & Ash Zemenick & Julia Michaels, 2022. "Different Jargon, Same Goals: Collaborations between Landscape Architects and Ecologists to Maximize Biodiversity in Urban Lawn Conversions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Massoni, Emma Soy & Barton, David N. & Rusch, Graciela M. & Gundersen, Vegard, 2018. "Bigger, more diverse and better? Mapping structural diversity and its recreational value in urban green spaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 502-516.
    19. Somajita Paul & Harini Nagendra, 2017. "Factors Influencing Perceptions and Use of Urban Nature: Surveys of Park Visitors in Delhi," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Rahman, Fabiha & Oliver, Robert & Buehler, Ralph & Lee, Jinhyung & Crawford, Thomas & Kim, Junghwan, 2025. "Impacts of point of interest (POI) data selection on 15-Minute City (15-MC) accessibility scores and inequality assessments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9135-:d:1771906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.