IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8767-d1761532.html

A Methodological Framework for Technology Selection and Regional Implementation of Residual Bioenergy in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Robinson Echavarria-Sarmiento

    (Grupo de Investigación en Alta Tensión-GRALTA, Escuela de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Electrónica, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760015, Colombia)

  • Eduardo Gómez-Luna

    (Grupo de Investigación en Alta Tensión-GRALTA, Escuela de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Electrónica, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760015, Colombia)

  • Rafael Franco-Manrique

    (Grupo de Investigación en Alta Tensión-GRALTA, Escuela de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Electrónica, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760015, Colombia)

  • Juan C. Vasquez

    (Center for Research on Microgrids (CROM), AAU Energy, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

Abstract

Colombia, due to its agricultural and livestock diversity, has significant potential for electricity generation from residual biomass. This study proposes a methodological framework to evaluate the most appropriate conversion technologies for the Colombian context, considering both technical and territorial factors. Through a review of thermochemical, biochemical, and physical methods, the available technologies and their respective energy products were identified. A national inventory of homogeneous residues by department was then developed, revealing that livestock waste accounts for 52.03% of the total, followed by banana residues (12.44%) and plantain residues (10.73%). These data were incorporated into a decision matrix linking regional residue availability with technological compatibility. The results emphasize the high feasibility of anaerobic digesters, ethanol bioreactors, gasifiers, and pyrolysis reactors, depending on the type and volume of residues. Furthermore, electricity generation remains largely concentrated in sugarcane bagasse from sugar mills in the southwest, highlighting the need to diversify applications in other regions. The proposed decision matrix provides a practical tool to prioritize technologies at the territorial level, positioning anaerobic digestion, bioethanol production, gasification, and pyrolysis as the most promising options to diversify Colombia’s energy matrix and strengthen regional energy resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Robinson Echavarria-Sarmiento & Eduardo Gómez-Luna & Rafael Franco-Manrique & Juan C. Vasquez, 2025. "A Methodological Framework for Technology Selection and Regional Implementation of Residual Bioenergy in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8767-:d:1761532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Damartzis, T. & Zabaniotou, A., 2011. "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 366-378, January.
    2. Stefano Gazzotti & Beatrice De Felice & Marco Aldo Ortenzi & Marco Parolini, 2022. "Approaches for Management and Valorization of Non-Homogeneous, Non-Recyclable Plastic Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    2. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    3. Theodore Dickerson & Juan Soria, 2013. "Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Syed-Hassan, Syed Shatir A. & Wang, Yi & Hu, Song & Su, Sheng & Xiang, Jun, 2017. "Thermochemical processing of sewage sludge to energy and fuel: Fundamentals, challenges and considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 888-913.
    5. Enagi, Ibrahim I. & Al-attab, K.A. & Zainal, Z.A., 2018. "Liquid biofuels utilization for gas turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 43-55.
    6. Velazquez Abad, Anthony & Cherrett, Tom & Holdsworth, Peter, 2015. "Waste-to-fuel opportunities for British quick service restaurants: A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 239-253.
    7. Kasmuri, N.H. & Kamarudin, S.K. & Abdullah, S.R.S. & Hasan, H.A. & Som, A.Md., 2017. "Process system engineering aspect of bio-alcohol fuel production from biomass via pyrolysis: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 914-923.
    8. Kim, Young-Doo & Yang, Chang-Won & Kim, Beom-Jong & Moon, Ji-Hong & Jeong, Jae-Yong & Jeong, Soo-Hwa & Lee, See-Hoon & Kim, Jae-Ho & Seo, Myung-Won & Lee, Sang-Bong & Kim, Jae-Kon & Lee, Uen-Do, 2016. "Fischer–tropsch diesel production and evaluation as alternative automotive fuel in pilot-scale integrated biomass-to-liquid process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 301-312.
    9. Panwar, N.L. & Kothari, Richa & Tyagi, V.V., 2012. "Thermo chemical conversion of biomass – Eco friendly energy routes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 1801-1816.
    10. Zhang, Kai & Chang, Jian & Guan, Yanjun & Chen, Honggang & Yang, Yongping & Jiang, Jianchun, 2013. "Lignocellulosic biomass gasification technology in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 175-184.
    11. Ma, Zhongqing & Zhang, Yimeng & Zhang, Qisheng & Qu, Yongbiao & Zhou, Jianbin & Qin, Hengfei, 2012. "Design and experimental investigation of a 190 kWe biomass fixed bed gasification and polygeneration pilot plant using a double air stage downdraft approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 140-147.
    12. Ossai, Chinedu I. & Boswell, Brian & Davies, Ian J., 2014. "Sustainable asset integrity management: Strategic imperatives for economic renewable energy generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 143-152.
    13. Patel, Madhumita & Zhang, Xiaolei & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1486-1499.
    14. Dossow, Marcel & Dieterich, Vincent & Hanel, Andreas & Spliethoff, Hartmut & Fendt, Sebastian, 2021. "Improving carbon efficiency for an advanced Biomass-to-Liquid process using hydrogen and oxygen from electrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Zahra Echresh Zadeh & Ali Abdulkhani & Basudeb Saha, 2020. "Characterization of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil from Hardwood and Softwood Lignin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Nwokolo, Nwabunwanne & Mamphweli, Sampson & Meyer, Edson & Tangwe, Stephen, 2014. "Electrical performance evaluation of Johansson biomass gasifier system coupled to a 150 KVA generator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 695-700.
    17. Sarkar, Madhura & Kumar, Ajay & Tumuluru, Jaya Shankar & Patil, Krushna N. & Bellmer, Danielle D., 2014. "Gasification performance of switchgrass pretreated with torrefaction and densification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 194-201.
    18. Nunes, L.J.R. & Matias, J.C.O. & Catalão, J.P.S., 2014. "A review on torrefied biomass pellets as a sustainable alternative to coal in power generation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 153-160.
    19. Dongdong Feng & Yijun Zhao & Yu Zhang & Shaozeng Sun & Jianmin Gao, 2018. "Steam Gasification of Sawdust Biochar Influenced by Chemical Speciation of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metallic Species," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Yung-Tsan Jou & Cheng-Yi Lo & Klint Allen Mariñas & Charmine Sheena Saflor & Charlie Jade Gutierrez & Cherilyn Sanchez & Danica Songco & Jemer Redston & Mark Bryle Devara & Marr Joseph Bucal, 2024. "Assessing the E-Commerce Sustainability Readiness: A Green Logistics Study on Online Sellers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8767-:d:1761532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.