IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8268-d1749511.html

Effects of the Supervision Down to the Countryside on Public Spending: Empirical Evidence from Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Suwen Zheng

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Chunhui Ye

    (China Academy of Rural Development, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Weibin Hu

    (China Academy of Rural Development, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Improving the supply of rural public goods serves as a driving engine for rural revitalization and provides fundamental assurance for achieving self-sustained development in rural areas. This study examines how China’s supervision down to the countryside (SDC) policy affects village-level public expenditure, addressing broader debates on grassroots governance reforms. Using 2005–2019 panel data from 100 villages across five provinces, we employ a multi-period staggered difference-in-differences (DID) design to identify causal effects. Empirical results indicate that SDC implementation significantly reduced overall village public spending and investment in new public goods, primarily driven by enhanced budget constraints. Case analysis reveals that this occurs through procedural formalization and participatory oversight. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the effect is more pronounced in villages with weaker clan influence, lower economic development, and absence of factional competition. The findings of this study provide empirical evidence for the perspective in village power supervision theory that “top-down, external, institutional supervision requires clearly defined boundaries” and provides a reference for policies aimed at promoting the sustainable development of rural governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Suwen Zheng & Chunhui Ye & Weibin Hu, 2025. "Effects of the Supervision Down to the Countryside on Public Spending: Empirical Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8268-:d:1749511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng, Xiangyi & Zhang, Li, 2011. "Democratic participation, fiscal reform and local governance: Empirical evidence on Chinese villages," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 88-97, March.
    2. Cai, Meina & Sun, Xin, 2018. "Institutional bindingness, power structure, and land expropriation in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 172-186.
    3. Desai, Raj M. & Olofsgård, Anders, 2019. "Can the poor organize? Public goods and self-help groups in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 33-52.
    4. Qiu, Tongwei & Zhang, Danru & Choy, S.T. Boris & Luo, Biliang, 2021. "The interaction between informal and formal institutions: A case study of private land property rights in rural China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 578-591.
    5. Zhang, Jing & Gan, Li & Xu, Lixin Colin & Yao, Yang, 2014. "Health shocks, village elections, and household income: Evidence from rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 155-168.
    6. Cai, Meina & Zhang, Qi & Zhao, Xiaolu, 2024. "Social Embeddedness, Power Balance, and Local Governance in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Villacis, Alexis H. & Kopp, Thomas & Mishra, Ashok K., 2024. "Agricultural marketing channels and market prices: Evidence from high-value crop producers in India," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1308-1321.
    2. Olivier Marie & Thomas Post & Zihan Ye & Xiaopeng Zou, 2024. "From Two Heads to One: The Short-Run Effects of the Recentralization of Political Power in Rural China," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-040/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. Xu, Qingwen & Liu, Chun & Gong, Xingyu & Ma, Xiang & Liu, Ding, 2025. "Digital financial inclusion as a safety net: Empowering households against health shocks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Weisong Qiu & Tieqi Wu & Peng Xue, 2022. "Can Mobile Payment Increase Household Income and Mitigate the Lower Income Condition Caused by Health Risks? Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Zhang, Jing & Gan, Li & Xu, Lixin Colin & Yao, Yang, 2014. "Health shocks, village elections, and household income: Evidence from rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 155-168.
    7. Liang, Pinghan & Xiao, Shukang, 2022. "Pray, vote, and money: The double-edged sword effect of religions on rural political participation in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Fan, Wei & Xu, Haolun & Cheng, Shulei & Yang, Fan, 2025. "How do health shocks affect household energy poverty?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Quanfeng Li & Zhe Dong & Guoming Du & Aizheng Yang, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Use Intensification in Village Settings: A Survey of Typical Chinese Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. James Alm & Yongzheng Liu, 2014. "China's Tax-for-Fee Reform and Village Inequality," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 38-64, March.
    12. Suwen Zheng & Chunhui Ye & Yunli Bai, 2023. "Does Supervision Down to the Countryside Level Benefit Rural Public Goods Supply? Evidence on the Extent of Households’ Satisfaction with Public Goods from 2005 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-34, May.
    13. Barbieri, Elisa & Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Pollio, Chiara & Rubini, Lauretta, 2020. "Getting the specialization right. Industrialization in Southern China in a sustainable development perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    14. Shao, Shuai & Tian, Zhihua & Zhang, Yan & Li, Baoli, 2023. "The housing status and two-child fertility willingness of floating population: Evidence from the Chinese General Social Survey," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 247-266.
    15. Limin Zhao & Xu Ma & Shi Jiao & Chengming Hu, 2025. "How WeChat groups enhance political trust in rural China: evidence from the China Rural Revitalization Survey," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Diandian Hao & Ziyi Yan & Yanan Wang & Bowen Wang, 2022. "Effect of Village Informal Institutions and Cadre-Mass Relationship for Farmers’ Participation in Rural Residential Environment Governance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Qiu, Tongwei & Li, Yifei & Shi, Xinjie & Peng, Changyan & Luo, Biliang, 2024. "Alternative modes of governance: Clans and social instability in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Chenxi Li & Jingyao Wu & Zenglei Xi & Weiqiang Zhang, 2021. "Farmers’ Satisfaction with Land Expropriation System Reform: A Case Study in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Wang, Rongyu & Tan, Rong, 2020. "Patterns of revenue distribution in rural residential land consolidation in contemporary China: The perspective of property rights delineation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Gong, Maogang & Zhong, Yanan & Zhang, Yun & Elahi, Ehsan & Yang, Yuanxi, 2023. "Have the new round of agricultural land system reform improved farmers' agricultural inputs in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8268-:d:1749511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.