IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8255-d1749204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating the Sustainability Conundrum of Construction Sand

Author

Listed:
  • Mehjabee Mahmud Mattra

    (Department of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Sujauddin

    (Department of Environmental Science and Management, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain

    (Institute of Forestry and Environmental Science, University of Chittagong, Chattogram 4331, Bangladesh)

  • Jeongsoo Yu

    (Graduate School of International Cultural Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8576, Japan)

  • Xiaoyue Liu

    (Graduate School of International Cultural Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8576, Japan)

  • Gaku Manago

    (Graduate School of International Cultural Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8576, Japan)

Abstract

Sand is the backbone of modern civilization and faces heightened demand in the Anthropocene. The uncontrolled extraction of sand raises concerns regarding its irreversible ecological impact. The sand industry is not well understood, especially from the perspective of sustainability. To address this knowledge gap, this systematic review combines policy analysis with the use of material flow analysis (MFA) indicators, environmental externalities, and geopolitics to assess the overall sustainability of the sand industry. By utilizing trade data, this study identified the primary importers and exporters of sand within each continent and selected the top 3–4 countries for analysis. Based on these countries, relevant studies in the literature on the trade and domestic extraction of sand and that used the principles of MFA were found to assess the patterns of its consumption. Illicit sand mining adds a further challenge regarding data accuracy and verification. This study revealed that China’s consumption of sand surpasses that of all the other countries studied, at 17,700 million tonnes, and China has the highest mass of recycled aggregates in use. Using gross domestic product as a proxy for size of the economy, it was found that China consumed 0.001251 million tonnes of sand per million USD. European nations showed a striking balance in their sand industries by placing equal importance on using virgin sand and recycled aggregates, thus contributing to a circular economy. The use of MFA for future research can reveal hidden flows by positioning itself as a science–policy interface, enabling greater circularity within the lock-ins of the construction sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehjabee Mahmud Mattra & Mohammad Sujauddin & Mohammad Mosharraf Hossain & Jeongsoo Yu & Xiaoyue Liu & Gaku Manago, 2025. "Navigating the Sustainability Conundrum of Construction Sand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8255-:d:1749204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanessa Lamb & Melissa Marschke & Jonathan Rigg, 2019. "Trading Sand, Undermining Lives: Omitted Livelihoods in the Global Trade in Sand," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(5), pages 1511-1528, September.
    2. Fatima Zahra Benkhattab & Mounir Hakkou & Ingrida Bagdanavičiūtė & Abdelmounim El Mrini & Hafid Zagaoui & Hassan Rhinane & Mehdi Maanan, 2020. "Spatial–temporal analysis of the shoreline change rate using automatic computation and geospatial tools along the Tetouan coast in Morocco," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 519-536, October.
    3. Xiaoyang Zhong & Sebastiaan Deetman & Arnold Tukker & Paul Behrens, 2022. "Increasing material efficiencies of buildings to address the global sand crisis," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 389-392, May.
    4. Philipp Wesche, 2021. "Rights of Nature in Practice: A Case Study on the Impacts of the Colombian Atrato River Decision," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 531-555.
    5. Eduardo Francisco Silva & Darlisson Fernandes Bento & Anderson Conceição Mendes & Fábio Góis Mota & Luiz Carlos Silva Mota & Arthur Iven Tavares Fonseca & Rodolfo Maduro Almeida & Livaldo Oliveira San, 2020. "Environmental impacts of sand mining in the city of Santarém, Amazon region, Northern Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 47-60, January.
    6. Marschke, Melissa & Rousseau, Jean-François, 2022. "Sand ecologies, livelihoods and governance in Asia: A systematic scoping review," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Ng, S. Thomas & Antwi-Afari, Prince & Amor, Ben, 2020. "Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    8. Steven Ronsmans & Benoit Nemery, 2019. "Sand particles — an overlooked occupational hazard," Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7769), pages 312-312, August.
    9. Ferrer, Luciana Maria & Rodriguez, Daniel Andrés & Forti, Maria Cristina & Carriello, Felix, 2021. "The anthropocene landscape and ecosystem services in the closure of sand mining: Paraíba do Sul River basin – Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Melissa House & Dale H. Vitt & Lilyan C. Glaeser & Jeremy A. Hartsock, 2022. "Reclaiming Wetlands after Oil Sands Mining in Alberta, Canada: The Changing Vegetation Regime at an Experimental Wetland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Kim, Tae Goun & Grigalunas, Thomas A. & Han, Kyung-Nam, 2008. "The economic costs to fisheries because of marine sand mining in Ongjin Korea: Concepts, methods, and illustrative results," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 498-507, April.
    12. Mette Bendixen & Jim Best & Chris Hackney & Lars Lønsmann Iversen, 2019. "Time is running out for sand," Nature, Nature, vol. 571(7763), pages 29-31, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rousseau, Jean-François, 2025. "The transient sand frontier: Senegal's moving sand procurement strategies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Marschke, Melissa & Rousseau, Jean-François, 2022. "Sand ecologies, livelihoods and governance in Asia: A systematic scoping review," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Mishra, Anshumali & Das, Sarat Kumar & Reddy, Krishna R., 2023. "Life cycle triple bottom line sustainability assessment of coal mine overburden sand versus river sand," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    4. Robert Machowski & Martyna A. Rzetala & Maksymilian Solarski & Mariusz Rzetala & Daniel Bakota & Arkadiusz Płomiński & Katarzyna Kłosowska, 2025. "Perceptions of a Water Reservoir Construction Project Among the Local Community and Potential Tourists and Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Bin Lei & Linjie Yu & Zhiyu Chen & Wanying Yang & Cheng Deng & Zhuo Tang, 2022. "Carbon Emission Evaluation of Recycled Fine Aggregate Concrete Based on Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Kieran Westley & Julia Nikolaus & Ahmad Emrage & Nic Flemming & Andrew Cooper, 2023. "The impact of coastal erosion on the archaeology of the Cyrenaican coast of Eastern Libya," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-38, April.
    7. Menon, Siddharth, 2025. "Sand, plantation urbanism and the extended political ecology of infrastructures in India," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128542, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Le Thanh Ha, 2025. "Does Circularity Transformation Hinder Climate Risk? A New Insight from European Countries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 2873-2899, August.
    9. Yunxin Peng & Adel A. Zadeh & Sheila M. Puffer, 2023. "Unearthing the Construction Industry’s Awareness of and Reactions to the Global Sand Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Nkechi McNeil-Ayuk & Ahmad Jrade, 2025. "Integrating Building Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment to Enhance the Decisions Related to Selecting Construction Methods at the Conceptual Design Stage of Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Igor Ceratti Treptow & Jordana Marques Kneipp & Clandia Maffini Gomes & Isak Kruglianskas & Rodrigo Reis Favarin & Carlos María Fernandez-Jardón, 2022. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Value Creation in Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Roope Husgafvel & Daishi Sakaguchi, 2021. "Circular Economy Development in the Construction Sector in Japan," World, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Michael Hübler & Frank Pothen, 2021. "Can smart policies solve the sand mining problem?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Daniel Ferrández & Manuel Álvarez & Pablo Saiz & Alicia Zaragoza, 2022. "Experimental Study with Plaster Mortars Made with Recycled Aggregate and Thermal Insulation Residues for Application in Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Roberto Cerchione & Francesco Colangelo & Ilenia Farina & Patrizia Ghisellini & Renato Passaro & Sergio Ulgiati, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete Production within a Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Eva Trinkuniene & Aurelija Burinskiene & Raimonda Bubliene, 2025. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach COPRAS for Developing Sustainable Building Practices in the European Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    17. Inês Bourgeois & Alexandra Queirós & Joaquim Oliveira & Hugo Rodrigues & Romeu Vicente & Victor M. Ferreira, 2022. "Development of an Eco-Design Tool for a Circular Approach to Building Renovation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Xin Yang & Xin Huang & Xiaoyan Qiu & Quanquan Guo & Xinxing Zhang, 2024. "Supramolecular metallic foams with ultrahigh specific strength and sustainable recyclability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Seeram Ramakrishna & Muhammad Pervaiz & Jimi Tjong & Patrizia Ghisellini & Mohini M Sain, 2022. "Low-Carbon Materials: Genesis, Thoughts, Case Study, and Perspectives," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 649-664, June.
    20. Garusinghe Dewa Ayesha Udari Garusinghe & Balasooriya Arachchige Kanchana Shiromi Perera & Umesha Sasanthi Weerapperuma, 2023. "Integrating Circular Economy Principles in Modular Construction to Enhance Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8255-:d:1749204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.