IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8235-d1748657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Impact and Driving Forces of Land Use Transformation on Ecological Environment in Urban Agglomeration from the Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Spatial Synergy

Author

Listed:
  • Lihong Ren

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Xiaofang Wang

    (Shandong Provincial Territorial Spatial Ecological Restoration Center, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Wenhui Jiang

    (Shandong Provincial Territorial Spatial Ecological Restoration Center, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Mei Ren

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Le Yin

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Xiaobo Zhang

    (Zaozhuang Municipal Bureau of Natural Resources and Planning, Zaozhuang 277800, China)

  • Baolei Zhang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Accurate analysis of land use transformation (LUT) and its ecological and environmental effects, along with investigations into how ecological and environmental quality responds to both natural and human factors, is crucial for protecting regional ecosystems. This research concentrated on the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration (YRDUA), analyzing land use change patterns and their effects on ecological environment quality (EEQ) from the perspectives of production, living, and ecological spaces. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was utilized to assess the immediate and mediated effects of environmental and socio-economic drivers. Additionally, this study examined how urban agglomeration integration affects LUT and EEQ. The findings suggest that: (1) Throughout 2000–2020, production land decreased, and living land expanded markedly, while ecological land remained largely stable. (2) Between 2000 and 2020, the overall environmental quality in the YRDUA declined, showing significant temporal and spatial disparities among regions. (3) Converting urban or rural residential land to agricultural land promotes ecological improvement, whereas the opposite conversion tends to result in environmental degradation. (4) Topography, climate, and greening directly improve environmental quality, whereas LUT, economic development and integration exert adverse impacts. Topography indirectly influences the ecological environment through its effects on climate, economy, regional integration, and LUT, whereas climate and the economy exert indirect effects via LUT, greening and integration. This research serves as a scientific foundation for ecological environment protection, sustainable growth and regional land space planning in urban agglomerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lihong Ren & Xiaofang Wang & Wenhui Jiang & Mei Ren & Le Yin & Xiaobo Zhang & Baolei Zhang, 2025. "Exploring Impact and Driving Forces of Land Use Transformation on Ecological Environment in Urban Agglomeration from the Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Spatial Synergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8235-:d:1748657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8235/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8235/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingxian Deng & Ren Yang, 2021. "Influence Mechanism of Production-Living-Ecological Space Changes in the Urbanization Process of Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Xintian Gan & Xiaochu Du & Chengjun Duan & Linhan Peng, 2024. "Evaluation of Ecological Environment Quality and Analysis of Influencing Factors in Wuhan City Based on RSEI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2021. "CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Qiaoli Chang & Yuying Sha & Yi Chen, 2024. "The Coupling Coordination and Influencing Factors of Urbanization and Ecological Resilience in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Kai Li & Beiying Zhang & Weidong Xiao & Yong Lu, 2022. "Land Use Transformation Based on Production−Living−Ecological Space and Associated Eco-Environment Effects: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Duanqiang Zhai & Xian Zhang & Jian Zhuo & Yanyun Mao, 2024. "Driving the Evolution of Land Use Patterns: The Impact of Urban Agglomeration Construction Land in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-34, September.
    7. Richard R. Shaker & Joseph Aversa & Victoria Papp & Bryant M. Serre & Brian R. Mackay, 2020. "Showcasing Relationships between Neighborhood Design and Wellbeing Toronto Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Panpan Hu & Feng Li & Xiao Sun & Yali Liu & Xinchuang Chen & Dan Hu, 2021. "Assessment of Land-Use/Cover Changes and Its Ecological Effect in Rapidly Urbanized Areas—Taking Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration as a Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Asabere, Stephen Boahen & Acheampong, Ransford A. & Ashiagbor, George & Beckers, Sandra Carola & Keck, Markus & Erasmi, Stefan & Schanze, Jochen & Sauer, Daniela, 2020. "Urbanization, land use transformation and spatio-environmental impacts: Analyses of trends and implications in major metropolitan regions of Ghana," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    10. Duan, Yaming & Wang, Hui & Huang, An & Xu, Yueqing & Lu, Longhui & Ji, Zhengxin, 2021. "Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior – A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biao Zhang & Dian Shao & Zhonghu Zhang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Dynamic, Effect and Governance Policy of Construction Land Use in Urban Agglomeration: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-36, May.
    2. Rui Bai & Ying Shi & Ying Pan, 2022. "Land-Use Classifying and Identification of the Production-Living-Ecological Space of Island Villages—A Case Study of Islands in the Western Sea Area of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Shanfeng Wu & Wenbo Mo & Runlei Zhang & Xuan Xiao & E Li & Xi Liu & Nan Yang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Production–Living–Ecological Space from 1990 to 2020 in Hunan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Qing Liu & Dongdong Yang & Lei Cao, 2022. "Evolution and Prediction of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on Land Use Dynamics in the Daqing River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Weisong Li & Yi Zeng & Yelin Peng & Wanxu Chen & Ying Dong & Ziyan Ye & Yan Chen, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Mechanisms of the Global Production-Living-Ecological Space Coupling Coordination Degree," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Fangjie Pan & Nannan Shu & Qing Wan & Qi Huang, 2023. "Land Use Function Transition and Associated Ecosystem Service Value Effects Based on Production–Living–Ecological Space: A Case Study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Ting Feng & Dong Wu & Xiaodong Yu & Meilin Zhang & Renling Dong & Sihan Chen, 2025. "Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Coupling Coordination of “Production–Living–Ecological” Functions Based on Grid Scale: Empirical Experience of Karst Beibu Gulf in Southwest Guangxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Jia Zhao & Yuluan Zhao & Xiaopiao Yang, 2022. "Evolution Characteristics and Driving Mechanism of the Territorial Space Pattern in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, September.
    9. Ruiqiu Pang & Ning Hu & Jingrui Zhou & Dongqi Sun & Hongying Ye, 2022. "Study on Eco-Environmental Effects of Land-Use Transitions and Their Influencing Factors in the Central and Southern Liaoning Urban Agglomeration: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Rehman, Anisur & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Islam, Md Saiful & Elahi, Yasir Arafat & Abbasi, Faraz Ahmad & Imtiaz, Asma, 2024. "Drivers of metaverse adoption for enhancing marketing capabilities of retail SMEs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    11. Morais, Ana Catarina & Ishida, Akira & Matsuda, Ruriko, 2024. "Ethical food consumption drivers in Japan. A S–O-R framework application using PLS-SEM with a MGA assessment based on clustering," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Kautish, Pradeep & Paço, Arminda & Thaichon, Park, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Chien, Yu-Shyun & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2025. "Investigating users’ intention to re-use shared electric scooters through a combined behavioral model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 533-544.
    14. Aibo Jin & Gachen Zhang & Ping Ma & Xiangrong Wang, 2024. "Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in the Chaohu Lake Basin Based on Land-Use Scenario Simulations," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Mohammadi, Zohreh & Kašpar, Jan & Tahri, Meryem & Sherstiuk, Maryna, 2024. "Assessing citizens' willingness for participatory forest management planning: A case study in the Czech Republic," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Hongyi Sun & Bingqian Zhang & Wenbin Ni, 2022. "A Hybrid Model Based on SEM and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Bernard Fosu Frimpong & Frank Molkenthin, 2021. "Tracking Urban Expansion Using Random Forests for the Classification of Landsat Imagery (1986–2015) and Predicting Urban/Built-Up Areas for 2025: A Study of the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Trinchera, Laura, 2024. "The role of artificial intelligence-enabled dynamic capability on environmental performance: The mediation effect of a data-driven culture in France and the USA," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8235-:d:1748657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.