IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7963-d1741796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Hub Drivers and Activities: A Desktop Assessment for Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Clio Flego

    (Economics Department (DIEC), University of Genoa, 16128 Genoa, Italy)

  • Alessio Tei

    (Economics Department (DIEC), University of Genoa, 16128 Genoa, Italy)

Abstract

In the 21st century, the concept of the Innovation Hubinnovation hub (IH) has become increasingly significant with the emergence of collaborative spaces, entrepreneurial ecosystems, and the pursuit of creative, sustainable solutions to contemporary challenges. While the literature presents various typologies of IHs, a critical knowledge gap remains due to the limited availability of empirical data on their core drivers, functions, and sustainability practices. Addressing this gap through a comprehensive primary and secondary data collection will enhance the global understanding of IH dynamics, supporting evidence-based decision-making; strategic development; and long-term accountability for hub managers, entrepreneurs, and policymakers. This study aims to identify and classify the predominant characteristics of IHs, examining their key drivers, core activities, and sustainability dimensions through an in-depth analysis of three leading innovation hub networks: the European Creative Hubs Network (ECHN), Impact Hub, and Talent Garden (TAG). By exploring how these hubs foster innovation and integrate sustainability into their operational models, this research offers actionable insights for stakeholders seeking to align innovation with inclusive, resilient, and environmentally conscious economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Clio Flego & Alessio Tei, 2025. "Innovation Hub Drivers and Activities: A Desktop Assessment for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7963-:d:1741796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7963/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7963/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schiuma, Giovanni & Santarsiero, Francesco, 2023. "Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
    3. Youtie, Jan & Shapira, Philip, 2008. "Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1188-1204, September.
    4. Alessandro Giudici & James G. Combs & Benedetto Lorenzo Cannatelli & Brett R. Smith, 2020. "Successful Scaling in Social Franchising: The Case of Impact Hub," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(2), pages 288-314, March.
    5. Lorenzo Cassi & Nicoletta Corrocher & Franco Malerba & Nicholas Vonortas, 2008. "Research Networks As Infrastructure For Knowledge Diffusion In European Regions," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7-8), pages 663-676.
    6. Moon Gyu Kim & Ji-Hwan Lee & Taewoo Roh & Hosung Son, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurship Education as an Innovation Hub for Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Case of the KAIST Social Entrepreneurship MBA Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Véronique Schaeffer & Mireille Matt, 2016. "Development of academic entrepreneurship in a non-mature context: the role of the university as a hub-organisation," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(9-10), pages 724-745, October.
    8. Rachel Firestone & Tim Kelly, 2016. "How Tech Hubs are Helping to Drive Economic Growth in Africa," World Bank Publications - Reports 23645, The World Bank Group.
    9. Avelino, Flor & Wittmayer, Julia M. & Pel, Bonno & Weaver, Paul & Dumitru, Adina & Haxeltine, Alex & Kemp, René & Jørgensen, Michael S. & Bauler, Tom & Ruijsink, Saskia & O'Riordan, Tim, 2019. "Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 195-206.
    10. Atiase, Victor Yawo & Kolade, Oluwaseun & Liedong, Tahiru Azaaviele, 2020. "The emergence and strategy of tech hubs in Africa: Implications for knowledge production and value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Rossi, Matteo & Chouaibi, Jamel & Graziano, Domenico & Festa, Giuseppe, 2022. "Corporate venture capitalists as entrepreneurial knowledge accelerators in global innovation ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 512-523.
    12. Xu, Xiaodong & Zhou, Shiqi & Xu, Haowen & Wu, Zhiqiang, 2025. "Advancing urban hub planning: A bibliometric analysis of concepts, effects evaluation, and spatial design," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Littlewood, David C. & Kiyumbu, Wilkister L., 2018. "“Hub” organisations in Kenya: What are they? What do they do? And what is their potential?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 276-285.
    14. Andrea Jiménez & Yingqin Zheng, 2018. "Tech hubs, innovation and development," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 95-118, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    2. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    3. Jose Montes & Aglaya Batz & Lizeth Fernanda Serrano Cárdenas, 2024. "A taxonomy of innovation spaces from the innovation networks lens," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Sun, Jinghong & Liu, Xuefeng & Cai, Jing, 2025. "Intermediaries that facilitate university–industry research partnerships: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    5. Chandra, Yanto & Shang, Liang & Mair, Johanna, 2021. "Drivers of success in social innovation: Insights into competition in open social innovation contests," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    6. Slitine, Romain & Chabaud, Didier & Richez-Battesti, Nadine, 2024. "Towards local sustainability: How intermediation fosters social innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Lopez, Henry & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2009. "How innovation intermediaries are shaping the technology market? An analysis of their business model," MPRA Paper 27016, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2010.
    8. Schaeffer, Véronique, 2019. "The use of material transfer agreements in academia: A threat to open science or a cooperation tool?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    9. Nobuya Fukugawa, 2011. "Impacts and channels of university spillovers before the national innovation system reform in Japan," International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 383-393.
    10. Alisa Sydow & Benedetto Lorenzo Cannatelli & Alessandro Giudici & Mario Molteni, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Workaround Practices in Severe Institutional Voids: Evidence From Kenya," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(2), pages 331-367, March.
    11. Gabriel Linton, 2024. "Triple Helix Dynamics and Hybrid Organizations: An Analysis of Value Creation Processes," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 20797-20822, December.
    12. Cocchi, Andrea, 2011. "Business models as systemic instruments for the evolution of traditional districts?," MPRA Paper 33766, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Matt, M. & Gaunand, A. & Joly, P-B. & Colinet, L., 2017. "Opening the black box of impact – Ideal-type impact pathways in a public agricultural research organization," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 207-218.
    14. Daniel Feser, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries revised: a systematic literature review on innovation intermediaries’ role for knowledge sharing," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1827-1862, July.
    15. Baum, Chad M. & Sick, Nathalie & Bröring, Stefanie, 2025. "Drivers for the emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge areas: An actor-level perspective on building legitimacy for the case of synthetic life sciences," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    16. Rodica Pamfilie & Smaranda Giusca & Robert Bumbac, 2014. "Academic research – a catalyst for the innovation process within companies in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 759-759, August.
    17. Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Li, Ying & Van de Vrande, Vareska, 2009. "The dual role of external corporate venturing in technological exploration," MPRA Paper 26488, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2010.
    18. Caloffi, Annalisa & Freo, Marzia & Ghinoi, Stefano & Mariani, Marco & Rossi, Federica, 2022. "Assessing the effects of a deliberate policy mix: The case of technology and innovation advisory services and innovation vouchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    19. Krzysztof BORODAKO & Jadwiga BERBEKA & Michał RUDNICKI & Mariusz ŠAPCZYŃSKI, 2021. "Online Visibility and Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Performance: The Scope of Interrelatedness," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 157-173, August.
    20. Guillermo Sanahuja-Peris & Víctor Agulló-Calatayud & Rocío Blay-Arráez, 2021. "David against Goliath: Diagnosis and Strategies for a Niche Sport to Develop a Sustainable Fan Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7963-:d:1741796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.