IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7890-d1740336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment and Prediction of Land Use and Landscape Ecological Risks in the Henan Section of the Yellow River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Zhang

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Jiaqi Han

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Jiayi Xu

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Wenjie Yang

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Bin Peng

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Mingcan Wei

    (College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

To accurately grasp the land and ecological dynamics in the Henan section of the Yellow River Basin (YRB) and provide detailed local data for the ecological protection of the YRB, this article takes the Henan segment within the YRB as the research area, explores the spatio-temporal evolution of land use (LU) and landscape ecological risks (LERS), and predicts LU and LERS under various scenarios in the future based on the PLUS model. We found that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, object types in research area were given priority with cultivated land, forest land, and construction land, with construction land and cultivated land experiencing the largest changes of 5.71% and −6.34%, respectively. Changes in other land types varied within a ±3% range. The expansion of construction land principally encroached upon cultivated land, indicating significant urban sprawl. (2) The high-ecological-risk areas were clustered in the area centered in Zhengzhou, and the low-ecological-risk areas were distributed in the edge of the study area. As risk levels increased, the risk center gradually shifted towards the central regions, particularly around Luoyang and at the junction of Luoyang, Zhengzhou, and Jiaozuo. (3) The LU status in 2030 was projected using the PLUS model under three varied scenarios. The Kappa coefficient of the model was 0.81, and the overall accuracy was about 88.13%. Cultivated land, forest land, and construction land still accounted for the main part, and the area of cultivated land and construction land changed significantly. Based on this analysis of LERS prediction, the distribution of risk levels in different scenarios was different, but in general, high-ecological-risk areas and higher-ecological-risk areas accounted for the main part, while the study area’s edges were where low-ecological-risk zones were situated. Research can offer scientific and technological support for the sensible utilization and administration of resources, along with the protection of the ecological environment and regional sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Zhang & Jiaqi Han & Jiayi Xu & Wenjie Yang & Bin Peng & Mingcan Wei, 2025. "Assessment and Prediction of Land Use and Landscape Ecological Risks in the Henan Section of the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7890-:d:1740336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7890/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7890/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Zhao & Mengwei Su & Xueyan Wang & Xiaoqing Li & Xinhan Chang & Pengtao Zhang, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Habitat Quality in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on Land Use Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Qiao, Zhenhua & Xu, Xinyi & Zou, Weitao & Huang, Yingli, 2024. "Urban sustainable development goals and ecosystem services: Pathways to achieving coordination," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Yuzhi Liu & Wenping Cao & Fuyuan Wang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Land Cover and Landscape Ecological Risk in Wuyishan National Park and Surrounding Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Zhen Wang & Anya Zhong & Quanzhi Li, 2024. "Optimization of Land Use Structure Based on the Coupling of GMOP and PLUS Models: A Case Study of Lvliang City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Holger Cammerer & Annegret Thieken & Peter Verburg, 2013. "Spatio-temporal dynamics in the flood exposure due to land use changes in the Alpine Lech Valley in Tyrol (Austria)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(3), pages 1243-1270, September.
    6. Guangchao Wen & Bingjie Wu & Lin Wang & Xiaohe Wang & Hongbo Xie, 2023. "Analysis of Eco-Environmental Geological Problems and Their Driving Forces in the Henan Section of the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhikun Mei & Xiyang Xu & Yongzhong Feng & Guangxin Ren, 2022. "Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment Based on Land Use Change in the Yellow River Basin of Shaanxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hua Liu & Dan-Yang Li & Rong Ma & Ming Ma, 2022. "Assessing the Ecological Risks Based on the Three-Dimensional Ecological Footprint Model in Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Shijia Zhang & Xiaojuan Cao, 2025. "The Impact of Industrial Land Misallocation on Sustainable Urban Development: Mechanisms and Spatial Spillover Effects," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Ying Li & Suiliang Huang, 2015. "Landscape Ecological Risk Responses to Land Use Change in the Luanhe River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Yi Wang & Jun Wang & Beibei Hao & Siyi Zhang & Junwei Ding & Bin He, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Future Land Use in the Beijiang River Basin Under Multidimensional Ecological Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Meizhe Liao & Zongwen Zhang & Ruirui Yan & Keyu Bai, 2024. "The Assessment of Biodiversity Changes and Sustainable Agricultural Development in The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Wenfeng Ji & Yu Ma & Ling Li & Mengxue Liu & Hejie Wei, 2025. "Ecosystem Supporting Services Can Directly and Indirectly Affect the Well-Being of Ethnic Minority Rural Residents: A Case Study in the Oasis Region of Western China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-30, August.
    7. Ligang Wang & Dan Liu & Xinyi Wu & Xiaopu Zhang & Qiaoyang Liu & Weijiang Kong & Pingping Luo & Shengfu Yang, 2025. "Simulation Analysis of Land Use Change via the PLUS-GMOP Coupling Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Laura Giuffrida & Marika Cerro & Giuseppe Cucuzza & Giovanni Signorello & Maria De Salvo, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Assessment of Habitat Quality in Sicily, Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Jinyuan Zhang & Zhongwu Zhang & Liping Liu & Xue Bai & Shiyu Wang & Lei Kang & Xingran Cai, 2023. "The coupling relationship and driving mechanism between urbanization and ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin from a multi-spatial scale perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Mustafa, Ahmed & Cools, Mario & Saadi, Ismaïl & Teller, Jacques, 2017. "Coupling agent-based, cellular automata and logistic regression into a hybrid urban expansion model (HUEM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 529-540.
    11. Chen Qu & Wen Li & Jia Xu & Song Shi, 2023. "Blackland Conservation and Utilization, Carbon Storage and Ecological Risk in Green Space: A Case Study from Heilongjiang Province in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Yulong Geng & Zhenqi Hu & Weihua Guo & Anya Zhong & Quanzhi Li, 2025. "Study on Carbon Storage Evolution and Scenario Response Under Multi-Pathway Drivers in High-Groundwater-Level Coal Resource-Based Cities: A Case Study of Three Cities in Shandong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, October.
    13. Xuexian Xu & Yuling Peng, 2023. "Ecological Compensation in Zhijiang City Based on Ecosystem Service Value and Ecological Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    14. Lena Junger & Severin Hohensinner & Karin Schroll & Klaus Wagner & Walter Seher, 2022. "Land Use in Flood-Prone Areas and Its Significance for Flood Risk Management—A Case Study of Alpine Regions in Austria," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Abdurrahim Aydın & Remzi Eker, 2022. "Future land use/land cover scenarios considering natural hazards using Dyna-CLUE in Uzungöl Nature Conservation Area (Trabzon-NE Türkiye)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2683-2707, December.
    16. Michele Marconi & Beatrice Gatto & Michele Magni & Fausto Marincioni, 2016. "A rapid method for flood susceptibility mapping in two districts of Phatthalung Province (Thailand): present and projected conditions for 2050," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 329-346, March.
    17. Shu Wang & Quanli Xu & Junhua Yi & Qinghong Wang & Qihong Ren & Youyou Li & Zhenheng Gao & You Li & Huishan Wu, 2025. "An Ecological Risk Assessment of the Dianchi Basin Based on Multi-Scenario Land Use Change Under the Constraint of an Ecological Defense Zone," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Guangzhao Wu & Yilin Lin & Junsan Zhao & Qiaoxiong Chen, 2024. "Identification of Land Use Conflict Based on Multi-Scenario Simulation—Taking the Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Fanglin Chen & Bingrui Dong & Min Zhang & Qiuhua Chen, 2025. "Government Environmental Auditing and Synergistic Governance Outcomes: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Qingchi Han & Jinzhuo Wu & Wenshu Lin, 2025. "Long-Term Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Force Analysis of Landscape Stability in the Forest–Grassland Ecotone of the Greater Khingan Mountains, Inner Mongolia, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7890-:d:1740336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.