IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8962-d1767547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Environmental Auditing and Synergistic Governance Outcomes: Evidence from Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Fanglin Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Bingrui Dong

    (School of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Min Zhang

    (School of Rural Revitalisation, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Qiuhua Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Ecological Construction Research Center of Fujian Provincial Social Science Research Base, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

This study aims to explore the role of government environmental auditing in promoting China’s coordinated goals of “pollution reduction, carbon mitigation, ecological expansion, and growth.” By analyzing 1959 panel data from 227 prefecture-level cities in China between 2011 and 2022, a four-dimensional evaluation framework was constructed, and empirical testing was carried out using a double machine learning method. The results indicate that environmental auditing significantly enhances the synergy of environmental governance, mainly by raising public environmental awareness, promoting industrial clustering, and fostering green innovation. Additionally, green finance provides complementary support to this process. This effect is particularly pronounced in regions with higher levels of marketization, more developed financial technology, and greater environmental expenditure. Based on these findings, this study concludes that environmental auditing plays a crucial role in promoting China’s coordinated goals of “pollution reduction, carbon mitigation, ecological expansion, and growth.” In particular, environmental auditing demonstrates its institutional value in promoting sustainable governance, especially in developing economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanglin Chen & Bingrui Dong & Min Zhang & Qiuhua Chen, 2025. "Government Environmental Auditing and Synergistic Governance Outcomes: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8962-:d:1767547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8962/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8962/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gustafsson, Bo, 1998. "Scope and limits of the market mechanism in environmental management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2-3), pages 259-274, February.
    2. repec:eme:maj000:maj-08-2019-2378 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    4. Liu, Haiying & Liu, Zexiao & Zhang, Chunhong & Li, Tianyu, 2023. "Transformational insurance and green credit incentive policies as financial mechanisms for green energy transitions and low-carbon economic development," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Tehmina Khan, 2017. "The initiation of environmental auditing in the United States," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(8), pages 810-826, September.
    6. Yu, Mingzhe & Deng, Xin, 2021. "The Inheritance of Marketization Level and Regional Human Capital Accumulation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    7. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    8. Zhou, Fang & Sun, Zibao & Lin, Yufeng, 2025. "Research on the impact mechanism and spillover effects of green finance empowering agricultural carbon emission reduction," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Tan, Jianhua & Zhou, Xinyue & Hua, Min & Chan, Kam C., 2025. "Can government environmental audit improve green innovation?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    10. Giraldo, Carlos & Giraldo, Iader & Gomez-Gonzalez, Jose E. & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Financial integration and banking stability: A post-global crisis assessment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Xiting Wu & Qun CAO & Xiaoping Tan & Liang Li, 2020. "The effect of audit of outgoing leading officials’ natural resource accountability on environmental governance: evidence from China," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1213-1241, November.
    12. Jiang, Qibo & Tan, Qingmei, 2021. "National environmental audit and improvement of regional energy efficiency from the perspective of institution and development differences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Qiao, Zhenhua & Xu, Xinyi & Zou, Weitao & Huang, Yingli, 2024. "Urban sustainable development goals and ecosystem services: Pathways to achieving coordination," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Sun, Lipeng & Luo, Kaikai & Zhou, Chaobo & Yan, Jiale, 2025. "Can the government environmental audits improve corporate green investment? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. repec:eme:maj000:maj-06-2016-1393 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Xiaoyu Li & Jiawei Tang & Chao Feng & Yexiao Chen, 2023. "Can Government Environmental Auditing Help to Improve Environmental Quality? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yangchun Cao & Wenfeng Chen & Yating Tian & Yuqiang Zhang, 2025. "Climate-Resilient City Pilot Programs and New-Quality Productivity: Causal Identification Based on Dual Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Luo, Kang & Lee, Chien-Chiang & Zeng, Mingli & Hu, Weihui, 2024. "How does the development of digital economy in central cities promote the coordinated development of regions? Evidence from 19 urban agglomerations in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Siyiti, Muhetaer & Yao, Xin, 2024. "Natural resource assets management and urban carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Stochastic Boundaries in Spatial General Equilibrium: A Diffusion-Based Approach to Causal Inference with Spillover Effects," Papers 2508.06594, arXiv.org.
    5. Ciżkowicz, Piotr & Ledóchowski, Michał & Rzońca, Andrzej, 2025. "Fiscal policy and government bond yields: New evidence from the EU," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Jiaqing Zhang & Ziyan Chen & Biqiao Hu & Daolin Zhu, 2024. "Do Regional Integration Policies Promote Integrated Urban–Rural Development? Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Liu, Junxian & Nie, Song & Lin, Tiantian, 2024. "Government auditing and urban energy efficiency in the context of the digital economy: Evidence from China's Auditing System reform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    8. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    9. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.
    10. João Juchem Neto & Julio Claeyssen, 2015. "Capital-induced labor migration in a spatial Solow model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 25-47, May.
    11. Arcalean, Calin & Glomm, Gerhard & Schiopu, Ioana, 2012. "Growth effects of spatial redistribution policies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 988-1008.
    12. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    13. Joan R Rosés & Nikolaus Wolf, 2021. "Regional growth and inequality in the long-run: Europe, 1900–2015," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(1), pages 17-48.
    14. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Christian Hansen & Kengo Kato, 2018. "High-dimensional econometrics and regularized GMM," CeMMAP working papers CWP35/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Emma Howard, 2017. "Social networks, geographic proximity, and firm performance in Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-69, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    16. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2006. "Governmental activity, integration, and agglomeration," Working Paper Series in Economics 57, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    17. Gao, Ting, 2004. "Regional industrial growth: evidence from Chinese industries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-124, January.
    18. María Ayuda & Fernando Collantes & Vicente Pinilla, 2010. "From locational fundamentals to increasing returns: the spatial concentration of population in Spain, 1787–2000," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 25-50, March.
    19. Asanov, Anastasiya-Mariya & Asanov, Igor & Buenstorf, Guido, 2024. "A low-cost digital first aid tool to reduce psychological distress in refugees: A multi-country randomized controlled trial of self-help online in the first months after the invasion of Ukraine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    20. Vasco Leite & Sofia Castro & João Correia-da-Silva, 2009. "The core periphery model with asymmetric inter-regional and intra-regional trade costs," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 8(1), pages 37-44, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8962-:d:1767547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.