IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p802-d1630268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation Analysis of Land Use Change via the PLUS-GMOP Coupling Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ligang Wang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
    Ningxia Natural Resources Information Center, Yinchuan 750002, China)

  • Dan Liu

    (Ningxia Natural Resources Information Center, Yinchuan 750002, China)

  • Xinyi Wu

    (Tibet Datang International Upper Nujiang River Hydropower Development Co., Ltd., Lhasa 850001, China)

  • Xiaopu Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Qiaoyang Liu

    (Ningxia Natural Resources Information Center, Yinchuan 750002, China)

  • Weijiang Kong

    (School of Earth Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610097, China)

  • Pingping Luo

    (School of Water and Environment, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
    Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecological Effects in Arid Region, Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shengfu Yang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

It is crucial to simulate land use change and assess the corresponding impact on ecosystem services to develop informed land management policies and conservation strategies. To comprehensively simulate the patterns of land use change under different management policies and evaluate the corresponding ecological service values (ESV), a method for coupling the Generalized Multi-Objective Programming (GMOP) model and Patch-generating Land Use Simulation (PLUS) model is proposed in this study. First, the GMOP model is used to obtain optimized land use solutions under different scenarios. Then, the PLUS model is used to analyze the mechanism driving land expansion, explore land conversion patterns, and, ultimately, achieve spatial expression of land use quantity changes. The uncertain parameters in the coupled model are processed by intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. The coupled model successfully integrates the outstanding spatiotemporal dynamic simulation capability of the PLUS model and the multiobjective optimization advantages of the GMOP model, effectively overcoming the limitations of applying a single model in land use analysis. Finally, four different scenarios are established for land use change, namely, business as usual (BAU), economic efficiency priority (RED), ecological protection priority (ELP), and coordinated economic and ecological development (EEB), to predict land use change trends and ecological service values. A case study of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region demonstrates that the area of agricultural land exhibits a stable growth trend in the four different scenarios, with the majority of the expansion occurring through the conversion of grassland. Concurrently, the rate of expansion of construction land is highest in the BAU scenario at 31.72%, compared with the area in 2020. This is notably higher than the rates observed in the RED (10.10%) and EEB (9.47%) cases. With the expansion of construction land, the ESV decreased by 3.485 billion, 1.514 billion, and 1.658 billion yuan in the BAU, RED, and ELP scenarios, representing 41.72%, 24.96%, and 34.05% decreases in ESV, respectively. The proposed integrated methodology accounts for various spatial constraints and land conversion behaviors, thereby ensuring a true and accurate reflection of land use dynamics. This methodology supports the quantification of ESV under different land management strategies, thereby providing policymakers with effective support for data-driven sustainable land use planning and conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ligang Wang & Dan Liu & Xinyi Wu & Xiaopu Zhang & Qiaoyang Liu & Weijiang Kong & Pingping Luo & Shengfu Yang, 2025. "Simulation Analysis of Land Use Change via the PLUS-GMOP Coupling Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:802-:d:1630268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongwu Zhang & Huimin Li & Yongjian Cao, 2022. "Research on the Coordinated Development of Economic Development and Ecological Environment of Nine Provinces (Regions) in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. van Vliet, Jasper & Bregt, Arnold K. & Hagen-Zanker, Alex, 2011. "Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1367-1375.
    3. Huang, Junlong & Tang, Zhuo & Liu, Dianfeng & He, Jianhua, 2020. "Ecological response to urban development in a changing socio-economic and climate context: Policy implications for balancing regional development and habitat conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Hongjie Peng & Lei Hua & Xuesong Zhang & Xuying Yuan & Jianhao Li, 2021. "Evaluation of ESV Change under Urban Expansion Based on Ecological Sensitivity: A Case Study of Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Duveiller, Gregory & Caporaso, Luca & Abad-Viñas, Raul & Perugini, Lucia & Grassi, Giacomo & Arneth, Almut & Cescatti, Alessandro, 2020. "Local biophysical effects of land use and land cover change: towards an assessment tool for policy makers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Shen, Xiaoqiang & Wang, Xiangdong & Zhang, Zhou & Lu, Zhangwei & Lv, Tiangui, 2019. "Evaluating the effectiveness of land use plans in containing urban expansion: An integrated view," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 205-213.
    7. Elumalai Kannan & Guru Balamurugan & Sudha Narayanan, 2021. "Spatial economic analysis of agricultural land use changes: a case of peri-urban Bangalore, India," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 34-50, January.
    8. Zhen Wang & Anya Zhong & Quanzhi Li, 2024. "Optimization of Land Use Structure Based on the Coupling of GMOP and PLUS Models: A Case Study of Lvliang City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Yanhong Zhao & Peng Hou & Jinbao Jiang & Jun Zhai & Yan Chen & Yongcai Wang & Junjun Bai & Bing Zhang & Haitao Xu, 2021. "Coordination Study on Ecological and Economic Coupling of the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Hui Fu & Yaowen Liang & Jie Chen & Ling Zhu & Guang Fu, 2024. "A New Framework of Land Use Simulation for Land Use Benefit Optimization Based on GMOP-PLUS Model—A Case Study of Haikou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Expansion from 2005 to 2018: The Case of Yangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Guzman, Luis A. & Escobar, Francisco & Peña, Javier & Cardona, Rafael, 2020. "A cellular automata-based land-use model as an integrated spatial decision support system for urban planning in developing cities: The case of the Bogotá region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Menzori, Ivan Damasco & Sousa, Isabel Cristina Nunes de & Gonçalves, Luciana Márcia, 2021. "Urban growth management and territorial governance approaches: A master plans conformance analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    4. Omar Hamdy & Hanan Gaber & Mohamed S. Abdalzaher & Mahmoud Elhadidy, 2022. "Identifying Exposure of Urban Area to Certain Seismic Hazard Using Machine Learning and GIS: A Case Study of Greater Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Haifen Lei & Jennifer Koch & Hui Shi & Shelby Snapp, 2022. "How Can Macro-Scale Land-Use Policies Be Integrated with Local-Scale Urban Growth? Exploring Trade-Offs for Sustainable Urbanization in Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Juliana Freitas Santos & Udo Schickhoff & Shabeh ul Hasson & Jürgen Böhner, 2023. "Biogeophysical Effects of Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes in South Asia: An Analysis of CMIP6 Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Brian Pickard & Joshua Gray & Ross Meentemeyer, 2017. "Comparing Quantity, Allocation and Configuration Accuracy of Multiple Land Change Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Chasia, Stanley & Olang, Luke O. & Sitoki, Lewis, 2023. "Modelling of land-use/cover change trajectories in a transboundary catchment of the Sio-Malaba-Malakisi Region in East Africa using the CLUE-s model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    9. Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xinhua Tong & Yanfei Wei & Xiaoqiang Shen, 2019. "Inside or Outside? The Impact Factors of Zoning–Land Use Mismatch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Yi Wang & Jun Wang & Beibei Hao & Siyi Zhang & Junwei Ding & Bin He, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Future Land Use in the Beijiang River Basin Under Multidimensional Ecological Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Hanwen Zhang & Yanqing Lang, 2022. "Quantifying and Analyzing the Responses of Habitat Quality to Land Use Change in Guangdong Province, China over the Past 40 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Alejandro Díaz-Jara & Daniela Manuschevich & Aarón Grau & Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, 2024. "Land Management Drifted: Land Use Scenario Modeling of Trancura River Basin, Araucanía, Chile," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-35, January.
    13. Wu, Wei & Yeager, Kevin M. & Peterson, Mark S. & Fulford, Richard S., 2015. "Neutral models as a way to evaluate the Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 55-69.
    14. Luo, Xiangyu & Jiang, Peng & Yang, Jingyi & Jin, Jing & Yang, Jun, 2021. "Simulating PM2.5 removal in an urban ecosystem based on the social-ecological model framework," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    15. Xue Zhang & Lingyun Liao & Zhengduo Xu & Jiayu Zhang & Mengwei Chi & Siren Lan & Qiaochun Gan, 2022. "Interactive Effects on Habitat Quality Using InVEST and GeoDetector Models in Wenzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Shokhrukh-Mirzo Jalilov & Yun Chen & Nguyen Hong Quang & Minh Nguyen Nguyen & Ben Leighton & Matt Paget & Neil Lazarow, 2021. "Estimation of Urban Land-Use Efficiency for Sustainable Development by Integrating over 30-Year Landsat Imagery with Population Data: A Case Study of Ha Long, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Min Zhou & Shukui Tan & Lizao Tao & Xiangbo Zhu & Ghulam Akhmat, 2015. "An interval fuzzy land-use allocation model (IFLAM) for Beijing in association with environmental and ecological consideration under uncertainty," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2269-2290, November.
    18. van Vliet, Jasper & Hagen-Zanker, Alex & Hurkens, Jelle & van Delden, Hedwig, 2013. "A fuzzy set approach to assess the predictive accuracy of land use simulations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 261, pages 32-42.
    19. Yue Wang & Donghe Quan & Weihong Zhu & Zhehao Lin & Ri Jin, 2023. "Habitat Quality Assessment under the Change of Vegetation Coverage in the Tumen River Cross-Border Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Makoto Tsukai & Satoko Ohno & Yuta Tsukano, 2022. "Transition of Socio-Demographic Characteristics in Urban Areas by Applying a Topic Model to Small Area Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:802-:d:1630268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.