Author
Listed:
- Zofia Pawłowska
(Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)
- Szymon Ordysiński
(Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)
- Małgorzata Pęciłło
(Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)
- Magdalena Galwas-Grzeszkiewicz
(Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland)
Abstract
Despite growing academic interest in platform work and the gig economy, most existing research focuses on Western Europe, often neglecting the unique institutional and socioeconomic contexts of Central and Eastern Europe. This study addresses that gap by exploring the working conditions of platform workers in Poland, with particular emphasis on both material and psychosocial dimensions from the workers’ own perspectives. Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of 450 platform workers engaged in both online and location-based tasks, using the computer-assisted web interviewing (CAWI) method. The findings show a high level of perceived autonomy, with 74% of respondents feeling that they are independent in their work. However, autonomy is often limited by external factors, in particular, the availability of work. Workers who treat platform work as a side job are significantly more likely to report a sense of autonomy. In terms of health and safety, only 27% expressed concerns about negative health impacts, and 24% reported poor working conditions. Those who received health and safety information from the platform were more likely to acknowledge potential risks. Interestingly, workers relying on platform work as their primary source of income were more likely to perceive their work as safe, compared to those treating it as supplementary employment.
Suggested Citation
Zofia Pawłowska & Szymon Ordysiński & Małgorzata Pęciłło & Magdalena Galwas-Grzeszkiewicz, 2025.
"A Study of Working Conditions in Platform Work,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6536-:d:1703593
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6536-:d:1703593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.