IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6416-d1700829.html

Examining the Role of Food Technology Neophobia in Shaping Consumer Attitudes and Intentions to Purchase Genetically Modified Foods

Author

Listed:
  • Eda Yaşa Özeltürkay

    (Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, Cag University, Mersin 33800, Turkey)

  • Ümit Doğrul

    (Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, Mersin University, Mersin 33200, Turkey)

  • Suzan Oğuz

    (Vocational School, Cag University, Mersin 33800, Turkey)

  • Deniz Yalçıntaş

    (Independent Researchers, Adana 01360, Turkey)

  • Murat Gülmez

    (Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, Cag University, Mersin 33800, Turkey)

Abstract

In recent years, significant changes in food consumption habits have emerged due to various factors, including climate change, population growth, urbanization, and the depletion of natural resources. These changes pose a threat to the stability of global food systems and raise serious concerns about food security. Although this process encourages innovative and sustainable food consumption, it also makes individuals more skeptical and concerned about new foods. In this context, understanding consumer intentions regarding behaviors such as purchasing genetically modified (GM) foods is critical for predicting consumer responses and promoting responsible consumption patterns within the scope of sustainability. This study examined the effects of food technology neophobia and perceived information on attitudes and purchase intentions toward genetically modified (GM) foods. Survey data were collected from 324 participants across Turkey and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings revealed that food technology neophobia reduces perceived benefits and increases perceived risks, whereas perceived information enhances perceived benefits and lowers perceived risks. Additionally, attitudes were found to influence the intention to purchase GM foods significantly. Global issues, such as climate change and the depletion of natural resources, highlight the importance of innovations in food technology for sustainable food production. Understanding consumer concerns and perceived knowledge levels regarding genetically modified (GM) foods is critical to ensuring that these products are accepted at the societal level in an informed and conscious way. This study contributes to the promotion of sustainable food technologies and responsible consumer behavior, in line with the objectives of Sustainable Development Goal 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).

Suggested Citation

  • Eda Yaşa Özeltürkay & Ümit Doğrul & Suzan Oğuz & Deniz Yalçıntaş & Murat Gülmez, 2025. "Examining the Role of Food Technology Neophobia in Shaping Consumer Attitudes and Intentions to Purchase Genetically Modified Foods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6416-:d:1700829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6416/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6416/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilles Laurent & Pierre Chandon & Brian Wansink, 2000. "A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness," Post-Print hal-00458440, HAL.
    2. Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Manoj Kumar Nallapaneni, 2024. "Europe Moves toward Pragmatic Sustainability: A More Human and Fraternal Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-4, July.
    3. LAURENT, Gilles & CHANDON, Pierre & WANSINK, Brian, 2000. "A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness," HEC Research Papers Series 698, HEC Paris.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suwelack, Thomas & Hogreve, Jens & Hoyer, Wayne D., 2011. "Understanding Money-Back Guarantees: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 462-478.
    2. Wagner, Tillmann & Rudolph, Thomas, 2010. "Towards a hierarchical theory of shopping motivation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 415-429.
    3. Yi Ding & Haifeng Xu & Chee Wei Phang & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2025. "Understanding consumers’ online browsing patterns and influence of marketing stimuli: A two-layer sequence analysis approach," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 1715-1747, December.
    4. Byun, Kyung-Ah (Kay) & Duhan, Dale F. & Dass, Mayukh, 2020. "The preservation of loyalty halo effects: An investigation of the post-product-recall behavior of loyal customers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 163-175.
    5. Wenyan Zhou & Oliver Hinz & Alexander Benlian, 2018. "The impact of the package opening process on product returns," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 279-308, September.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5853 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Bhat Ishfaq Hussain & Singh Sapna, 2018. "Examining the moderating effect of shopping value on private-label and loyalty in Indian grocery stores," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 748-760, March.
    8. H. Bodur & Ting Gao & Bianca Grohmann, 2014. "The Ethical Attribute Stigma: Understanding When Ethical Attributes Improve Consumer Responses to Product Evaluations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 167-177, June.
    9. Rabbanee, Fazlul K. & Roy, Rajat & Sharma, Piyush, 2022. "Contextual differences in the moderating effects of price consciousness and social desirability in pay-what-you-want (PWYW) pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 13-25.
    10. Rizzi, Francesco & Gigliotti, Marina & Runfola, Andrea & Ferrucci, Luca, 2022. "Don't miss the boat when consumers are in-store! Exploring the use of point-of-purchase displays to promote green and non-green products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Laure Ambroise & Jean-Marie Brignier & Clarinda Mathews, 2010. "Les motivations cachées des consommateurs de marques d'enseigne : et si on parlait d'autre chose que du rapport qualité-prix ?," Post-Print halshs-00649521, HAL.
    12. Elisa Montaguti & Scott A. Neslin & Sara Valentini, 2016. "Can Marketing Campaigns Induce Multichannel Buying and More Profitable Customers? A Field Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 201-217, March.
    13. Yoojung Kim & Sejung Marina Choi, 2022. "When Bad Becomes Good: The Role of Congruence and Product Type in the CSR Initiatives of Stigmatized Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Goic, Marcel & Rojas, Andrea & Saavedra, Ignacio, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Triggered Email Marketing in Addressing Browse Abandonments," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 118-145.
    15. Kondo, Fumiyo N. & Okubo, Taishi, 2022. "Understanding multi-channel consumer behavior: A comparison between segmentations of multi-channel purchases by product category and overall products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Haans, Hans & Gijsbrechts, Els, 2011. "“One-deal-fits-all?” On Category Sales Promotion Effectiveness in Smaller versus Larger Supermarkets," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 427-443.
    17. Koen Pauwels & Shuba Srinivasan & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "When Do Price Thresholds Matter in Retail Categories?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 83-100, 01-02.
    18. Su, Yiqiang & Geunes, Joseph, 2012. "Price promotions, operations cost, and profit in a two-stage supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 891-905.
    19. Souiden, Nizar & Chaouali, Walid & Baccouche, Mona, 2019. "Consumers’ attitude and adoption of location-based coupons: The case of the retail fast food sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 116-132.
    20. Stephanie Schwipper & Severine Peche & Gertrud Schmitz, 2020. "Mobile Location-Based Services’ Value-in-Use in Inner Cities: Do a Customer’s Shopping Patterns, Prior User Experience, and Sales Promotions Matter?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 511-564, October.
    21. Raghubir, Priya & Celly, Kirti Sawhney, 2011. "Promoting promotions: Does showcasing free gifts backfire?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 55-58, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6416-:d:1700829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.