IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6376-d1699799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MCDM-Based Analysis of Site Suitability for Renewable Energy Community Projects in the Gargano District

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Agliata

    (Faculty of Technological and Innovation Sciences, University Mercatorum, Piazza E. Mattei, 00186 Roma, Italy)

  • Filippo Busato

    (Faculty of Technological and Innovation Sciences, University Mercatorum, Piazza E. Mattei, 00186 Roma, Italy)

  • Andrea Presciutti

    (Faculty of Technological and Innovation Sciences, University Mercatorum, Piazza E. Mattei, 00186 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

The increasing urgency of the energy transition, particularly in ecologically sensitive regions, demands spatially informed planning tools to guide renewable energy development. This study presents a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach to assess the suitability of the Gargano district in southern Italy for the implementation of Renewable Energy Communities. The analysis combines expert-based weighting and the Weighted Linear Combination method to evaluate seven key criteria grouped into environmental, socioeconomic, and technical dimensions. The resulting suitability scores, calculated at the municipal scale, highlight spatial disparities across the district, revealing that areas with the highest potential for Renewable Energy Community (REC) deployment are largely situated at the boundaries of the Gargano National Park. These zones benefit from stronger infrastructure, higher energy demand, and fewer environmental constraints, particularly with regard to wind energy initiatives. Conversely, municipalities within the park exhibit lower suitability, constrained by strict landscape regulations and lower population density. The findings provide valuable insights for regional planners and policymakers, supporting the adoption of targeted, environmentally compatible strategies for the advancement of citizen-led renewable energy initiatives in complex territorial contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Agliata & Filippo Busato & Andrea Presciutti, 2025. "MCDM-Based Analysis of Site Suitability for Renewable Energy Community Projects in the Gargano District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6376-:d:1699799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6376/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6376/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shoaib Ahmed & Amjad Ali & Antonio D’Angola, 2024. "A Review of Renewable Energy Communities: Concepts, Scope, Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, February.
    2. Giovanni Gentilesco & Antonio Coletta & Luigi Tarricone & Vittorio Alba, 2023. "Bioclimatic Characterization Relating to Temperature and Subsequent Future Scenarios of Vine Growing across the Apulia Region in Southern Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Michael Krug & Maria Rosaria Di Nucci & Matteo Caldera & Elena De Luca, 2022. "Mainstreaming Community Energy: Is the Renewable Energy Directive a Driver for Renewable Energy Communities in Germany and Italy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Lazzari, Florencia & Mor, Gerard & Cipriano, Jordi & Solsona, Francesc & Chemisana, Daniel & Guericke, Daniela, 2023. "Optimizing planning and operation of renewable energy communities with genetic algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    5. José Eduardo Tafula & Constantino Dário Justo & Pedro Moura & Jérôme Mendes & Ana Soares, 2023. "Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Optimum Site Selection for Off-Grid Solar Photovoltaic Microgrids in Mozambique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-41, March.
    6. Luis Oliveros-Cano & Juan Salgado-Meza & Carlos Robles-Algar n, 2020. "Technical-Economic-Environmental Analysis for the Implementation of Hybrid Energy Systems," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 57-64.
    7. Höfer, Tim & Sunak, Yasin & Siddique, Hafiz & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 222-243.
    8. Domenico Pisani & Pasquale Pazienza & Enrico Vito Perrino & Diana Caporale & Caterina De Lucia, 2021. "The Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services of Biodiversity Components in Protected Areas: A Review for a Framework of Analysis for the Gargano National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Sousa, Jorge & Lagarto, João & Camus, Cristina & Viveiros, Carla & Barata, Filipe & Silva, Pedro & Alegria, Ricardo & Paraíba, Orlando, 2023. "Renewable energy communities optimal design supported by an optimization model for investment in PV/wind capacity and renewable electricity sharing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    10. Yu, Yang & Wu, Shibo & Yu, Jianxing & Xu, Ya & Song, Lin & Xu, Weipeng, 2022. "A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework for offshore wind turbine selection: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    11. Bernadette Fina & Hans Auer, 2020. "Economic Viability of Renewable Energy Communities under the Framework of the Renewable Energy Directive Transposed to Austrian Law," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, November.
    12. Anwarzai, Mohammad Abed & Nagasaka, Ken, 2017. "Utility-scale implementable potential of wind and solar energies for Afghanistan using GIS multi-criteria decision analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 150-160.
    13. Anita Tatti & Sibilla Ferroni & Martina Ferrando & Mario Motta & Francesco Causone, 2023. "The Emerging Trends of Renewable Energy Communities’ Development in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Yanez-Rosales, Pablo & Río-Gamero, B. Del & Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta, 2024. "Rationale for selecting the most suitable areas for offshore wind energy farms in isolated island systems. Case study: Canary Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    15. Aly, Ahmed & Jensen, Steen Solvang & Pedersen, Anders Branth, 2017. "Solar power potential of Tanzania: Identifying CSP and PV hot spots through a GIS multicriteria decision making analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 159-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casella, Virginia & Ferro, Giulio & Parodi, Luca & Robba, Michela, 2025. "Maximizing shared benefits in renewable energy communities: A Bilevel optimization model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    2. Ali, Shahid & Taweekun, Juntakan & Techato, Kuaanan & Waewsak, Jompob & Gyawali, Saroj, 2019. "GIS based site suitability assessment for wind and solar farms in Songkhla, Thailand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1360-1372.
    3. Al Garni, Hassan Z. & Awasthi, Anjali, 2017. "Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1225-1240.
    4. V ctor Olivero-Ort z & Carlos Robles-Algar n & Julie Viloria-Porto, 2021. "An AHP-GIS Based Approach for Site Suitability Analysis of Solar-Wind Projects in Santa Marta, Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 211-223.
    5. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K. & Yadav, S.S. & Kumar, Gaurav, 2021. "MCDM and GIS based modelling technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 865-884.
    6. Shoaib Ahmed & Amjad Ali & Antonio D’Angola, 2024. "A Review of Renewable Energy Communities: Concepts, Scope, Progress, Challenges, and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, February.
    7. Giulia Taromboli & Laura Campagna & Cristina Bergonzi & Filippo Bovera & Vincenzo Trovato & Marco Merlo & Giuliano Rancilio, 2025. "Renewable Energy Communities: Frameworks and Implementation of Regulatory, Technical, and Social Aspects Across EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, May.
    8. Pojadas, Dave J. & Abundo, Michael Lochinvar S., 2022. "A spatial cost-benefit-externality modelling framework for siting of variable renewable energy farms: A case in Bohol, Philippines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1177-1187.
    9. Waewsak, Jompob & Ali, Shahid & Natee, Warut & Kongruang, Chuleerat & Chancham, Chana & Gagnon, Yves, 2020. "Assessment of hybrid, firm renewable energy-based power plants: Application in the southernmost region of Thailand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    10. Li, Xiaoya & Dong, Xinyu & Ye, Yanmei, 2024. "An interaction model applied to optimize photovoltaic farm location: A case study of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    11. Wang, Yongli & Tao, Siyi & Chen, Xin & Huang, Feifei & Xu, Xiaomin & Liu, Xiaoli & Liu, Yang & Liu, Lin, 2022. "Method multi-criteria decision-making method for site selection analysis and evaluation of urban integrated energy stations based on geographic information system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 273-292.
    12. Finn, Thomas & McKenzie, Paul, 2020. "A high-resolution suitability index for solar farm location in complex landscapes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 520-533.
    13. Sward, Jeffrey A. & Nilson, Roberta S. & Katkar, Venktesh V. & Stedman, Richard C. & Kay, David L. & Ifft, Jennifer E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Integrating social considerations in multicriteria decision analysis for utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    14. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Yılmaz, Kutay & Dinçer, Ali Ersin & Ayhan, Elif N., 2023. "Exploring flood and erosion risk indices for optimal solar PV site selection and assessing the influence of topographic resolution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Hauger, Salome & Lieb, Vanessa & Glaser, Rüdiger, 2025. "Spatial potential analysis and site selection for agrivoltaics in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Jalil Heidary Dahooie & Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan & Zahra Shoaei Naeini & Amir Salar Vanaki & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2022. "A Hybrid Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making Aggregation Method and Geographic Information System for Selecting Optimal Solar Power Plants in Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Yao, Lingxiang & Guan, Zhiwen & Wang, Yang & Hui, Hongxun & Luo, Shuyu & Jia, Chuyun & You, Xingxing & Xiao, Xianyong, 2025. "Evaluating the feasibility of concentrated solar power as a replacement for coal-fired power in China: A comprehensive comparative analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PA).
    19. Fotsing Metegam, Isabelle Flora & Wolff, Eleonore & Tchinda, René & Huart, Michel & Chara-Dackou, Venant Sorel, 2025. "Evaluation of on-grid and off-grid solar photovoltaic sites in Cameroon using geographic information systems, fuzzy logic, and multi-criteria analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    20. Elisa Moretti & Ettore Stamponi, 2023. "The Renewable Energy Communities in Italy and the Role of Public Administrations: The Experience of the Municipality of Assisi between Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6376-:d:1699799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.