IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6237-d1696776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Web 2.0 Tools on the Sustainable Development of E-Commerce: Empirical Evidence from European Union Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Madalina Mazare

    (Management Department, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010615 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cezar-Petre Simion

    (Management Department, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010615 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In the context of accelerating digitalization, this study investigates how electronic commerce performance is influenced by Web 2.0 instruments in the 27 EU member states. Analyzing literature reviews and performing our own bibliometric review, we identified a gap related to the measurable economic results of e-commerce. The scope of this study was to analyze the relationship between Web 2.0 tools and the level of turnover generated by e-commerce, applying robust econometric models based on panel data regression with random effects and fixed effects (Arellano–Bond). The results highlight that the online paid advertisement and social media usage variables have significant, positive effects on e-commerce performance, confirming the first and second hypotheses. “Use the enterprise’s blog or microblogs” and “use of multimedia content sharing websites” do not influence enterprises’ total turnover from e-commerce sales to a valid and statistically significant extent. Thus, the third and fourth hypotheses are not confirmed by the results of the research conducted, possibly due to limited innovation and platform ownership in Europe. This study makes a notable empirical and methodological contribution, embedding digital sustainability in the analysis, which implies that the findings can be used for updating e-commerce policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Madalina Mazare & Cezar-Petre Simion, 2025. "The Influence of Web 2.0 Tools on the Sustainable Development of E-Commerce: Empirical Evidence from European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6237-:d:1696776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    2. Mateusz Lewandowski, 2016. "Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Mangold, W. Glynn & Faulds, David J., 2009. "Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 357-365, July.
    4. Hajli, Nick, 2015. "Social commerce constructs and consumer's intention to buy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 183-191.
    5. Fatima Afzal & Benson Lim, 2022. "Organizational Factors Influencing the Sustainability Performance of Construction Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Eglantina Hysa & Alba Kruja & Naqeeb Ur Rehman & Rafael Laurenti, 2020. "Circular Economy Innovation and Environmental Sustainability Impact on Economic Growth: An Integrated Model for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes & Parisa Ziarati & Pablo de Frutos Madrazo & Iza Gigauri, 2025. "Digital Marketing as a Driver of Change Towards the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Clauss & Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, 2020. "Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3006-3024, December.
    3. Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Natalia Yakovleva & Francisco Camacho-Ferre, 2020. "Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Ewa Mazur-Wierzbicka, 2021. "Towards Circular Economy—A Comparative Analysis of the Countries of the European Union," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Sabina Scarpellini, 2022. "Social impacts of a circular business model: An approach from a sustainability accounting and reporting perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 646-656, May.
    6. Gheorghița Dincă & Ana-Angela Milan & Maria Letiția Andronic & Anna-Maria Pasztori & Dragoș Dincă, 2022. "Does Circular Economy Contribute to Smart Cities’ Sustainable Development?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Ahmed Zainul Abideen & Jaafar Pyeman & Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram & Ming-Lang Tseng & Shahryar Sorooshian, 2021. "Leveraging Capabilities of Technology into a Circular Supply Chain to Build Circular Business Models: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    8. ISACHI, Silvia Elena, 2022. "Circular Economy - The Premises Of Business Models Circular," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 10(1), pages 238-245, October.
    9. Jose Torres-Pruñonosa & Miquel Angel Plaza-Navas & Francisco Díez-Martín & Albert Beltran-Cangrós, 2021. "The Intellectual Structure of Social and Sustainable Public Procurement Research: A Co-Citation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-33, January.
    10. Filippo Corsini & Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti & Marco Frey, 2023. "Fostering the Circular Economy with Blockchain Technology: Insights from a Bibliometric Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 1819-1839, December.
    11. Nofrizal, & Juju, Undang & Sucherly, & N, Arizal & Waldelmi, Idel & Aznuriyandi,, 2023. "Changes and determinants of consumer shopping behavior in E-commerce and social media product Muslimah," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Alan, Hale & Köker, Ali Rıza, 2023. "Analyzing and mapping agricultural waste recycling research: An integrative review for conceptual framework and future directions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    13. Zhen Liu & Jing Liu & Mohamed Osmani, 2021. "Integration of Digital Economy and Circular Economy: Current Status and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Fatima Khitous & Fernanda Strozzi & Andrea Urbinati & Fernando Alberti, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Network Analysis of Existing Themes and Emerging Research Trends in Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    16. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.
    17. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    18. Yingjin Song & Ruiyi Li & Guanyi Chen & Beibei Yan & Lei Zhong & Yuxin Wang & Yihang Li & Jinlei Li & Yingxiu Zhang, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Current Status on Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils during 2000–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    20. Niccolò Comerio & Fernanda Strozzi, 2019. "Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(1), pages 109-131, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6237-:d:1696776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.