IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6163-d1695113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Smart City Pilots Succeed—Based on the Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy Sets of 35 Cities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingjing Lin

    (School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

  • Ying Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

  • Zijing Wen

    (School of Public Administration, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

Abstract

In China, smart city pilots has become an important scheme to promote the modernization of the national governance system and capacity. Based on the TOE framework, this study takes 35 Chinese smart cities as sample cities and uses the qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to explore the influencing factors of smart city pilot construction. The results show that: (1) No single factor can constitute the necessary conditions for the high and non-high construction efficiency of a smart city pilot. (2) There are five configurations leading to the high construction efficiency of a smart city pilot, which can be summarized into three driving modes: the organizational mode composed of organizations, the organization–environment mode composed of organizations and environment, and the technology–environment mode composed of technology and environment. There are three driving modes of non-high construction efficiency of a smart city pilot, which have an asymmetric relationship with the driving mode of high construction efficiency of a smart city pilot. (3) There is a potential substitution relationship among relevant factors in the aspects of technology, organization, and environment, which can effectively replace and promote the efficient construction of a smart city. The research results have implications for improving the effectiveness of smart city construction and promoting urban innovative development and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingjing Lin & Ying Wang & Zijing Wen, 2025. "How Smart City Pilots Succeed—Based on the Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy Sets of 35 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6163-:d:1695113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6163/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6163/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berry, Frances Stokes & Berry, William D., 1990. "State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(2), pages 395-415, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janel Jett & Leigh Raymond, 2021. "Issue Framing and U.S. State Energy and Climate Policy Choice," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 278-299, May.
    2. Min Xiong & Shaoming Cheng & Jerry Zhirong Zhao, 2025. "Policy Imitation Based on Similarities: The Diffusion of Public–Private Partnerships," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(2), pages 130-145, May.
    3. Amy Y. Li, 2017. "Covet Thy Neighbor or “Reverse Policy Diffusion”? State Adoption of Performance Funding 2.0," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(7), pages 746-771, November.
    4. Lars P. Feld & Horst Zimmermann & Thomas Döring, 2003. "Föderalismus, Dezentralität und Wirtschaftswachstum," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(3), pages 361-377.
    5. Valente, Thomas W. & Pitts, Stephanie & Wipfli, Heather & Vega Yon, George G., 2019. "Network influences on policy implementation: Evidence from a global health treaty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 188-197.
    6. Fonseca, Camila & Jiang, Haiyue & Zeerak, Raihana & Zhao, Jerry Zhirong, 2024. "Explaining the adoption of electric vehicle fees across the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 139-149.
    7. Srinivas C. Parinandi, 2020. "Policy Inventing and Borrowing among State Legislatures," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 852-868, October.
    8. Jingru Li & Jinxiao Ji & Jian Zuo & Yi Tan, 2023. "Is Policy the Necessary or Sufficient Driving Force of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Industry Development? Experience from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. William D. Berry & Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt & Justin Esarey, 2010. "Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 248-266, January.
    10. Hayashida, Sherilyn & La Croix, Sumner & Coffman, Makena, 2021. "Understanding changes in electric vehicle policies in the U.S. states, 2010–2018," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 211-223.
    11. Chun-Fang Chiang & Jason M. Kuo & Megumi Naoi & Jin-Tan Liu, 2020. "What Do Voters Learn from Foreign News? Emulation, Backlash, and Public Support for Trade Agreements," NBER Working Papers 27497, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Cletus C. Coughlin & Thomas A. Garrett & Ruben Hernandez-Murillo, 2004. "Spatial probit and the geographic patterns of state lotteries," Working Papers 2003-042, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    13. Felix Strebel & Thomas Widmer, 2012. "Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 385-398, December.
    14. repec:osf:socarx:2mnws_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Xiaohan Li & Yang Lv & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker & Xun Zeng, 2022. "Assessment of Critical Diffusion Factors of Public–Private Partnership and Social Policy: Evidence from Mainland Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Jäkel Tim, 2019. "Performance Gaps, Peer Effects, and Comparative Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Local Government," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 27-53, June.
    17. Arbolino, Roberta & Boffardi, Raffaele & Bonasia, Mariangela & Capasso, Salvatore & De Simone, Luisa, 2025. "Imitation or learning: Exploring the drivers of Special economic zones," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 456-466.
    18. Andreas Bernecker & Pierre C. Boyer & Christina Gathmann, 2021. "The Role of Electoral Incentives for Policy Innovation: Evidence from the US Welfare Reform," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 26-57, May.
    19. Cecilia Nwigwe & S.A. Yusuf & V.O. Okoruwa, 2012. "Determinants of Demand for Gambling/Office Football Pool Betting in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria," Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 6(2), pages 69-81, August.
    20. Weixing Liu & Hongtao Yi, 2020. "What Affects the Diffusion of New Energy Vehicles Financial Subsidy Policy? Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    21. Lars P. Feld, 2006. "Regulatory Competition and Federalism in Switzerland: Diffusion by Horizontal and Vertical Interaction," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-22, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6163-:d:1695113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.