IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6147-d1694956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Anaerobic Digestion Process of Sewage Sludge in Terms of Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emission: Pre- or Post-Thermal Hydrolysis?

Author

Listed:
  • Yawen Ye

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Azizi Selemani Msuya

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xiaohu Dai

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China
    Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xiaoli Chai

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China
    Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Boran Wu

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China
    Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

Sewage sludge, a by-product of biological wastewater treatment, poses significant environmental and health risks if not properly managed. Anaerobic digestion (AD), widely used as a stabilization technology for sewage sludge, faces challenges such as rate-limiting hydrolysis steps and difficult dewatering of residual digestate. To address these issues, thermal hydrolysis (TH) has been explored as a pretreatment or post-treatment method. This study systematically analyzes the typical sludge treatment pathways incorporating TH either as a pretreatment step to AD or as a post-treatment step, combined with incineration or land application for the final disposal. The mass balance algorithm was applied to evaluate the chemical consumption, and energy input/output calculations were conducted to assess the potential effects of TH on energy recovery. Carbon emissions were estimated using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodology, considering direct, indirect, and compensated carbon emissions. The results indicate that applying TH as a post-treatment significantly reduces the carbon emissions by 65.94% compared to conventional AD, primarily due to the enhanced dewaterability and reduced chemical flocculant usage. In contrast, TH as a pretreatment step only moderates the emission reduction. The combination of post-TH with land application results in the lowest carbon emissions among the evaluated pathways, highlighting the environmental benefits of this approach. All the findings here are expected to provide insights into optimizing the technical combination mode of sludge processing pathways in terms of minimizing carbon emission.

Suggested Citation

  • Yawen Ye & Azizi Selemani Msuya & Xiaohu Dai & Xiaoli Chai & Boran Wu, 2025. "Improving Anaerobic Digestion Process of Sewage Sludge in Terms of Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emission: Pre- or Post-Thermal Hydrolysis?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6147-:d:1694956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6147/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6147/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jain, Siddharth & Jain, Shivani & Wolf, Ingo Tim & Lee, Jonathan & Tong, Yen Wah, 2015. "A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-154.
    2. Pantaleo, Antonio & Gennaro, Bernardo De & Shah, Nilay, 2013. "Assessment of optimal size of anaerobic co-digestion plants: An application to cattle farms in the province of Bari (Italy)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 57-70.
    3. Seongmin Kang & Seungjin Kim & Jeongwoo Lee & Youngjae Jeon & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2017. "A Study on Applying Biomass Fraction for Greenhouse Gases Emission Estimation of a Sewage Sludge Incinerator in Korea: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    2. Palakodeti, Advait & Azman, Samet & Rossi, Barbara & Dewil, Raf & Appels, Lise, 2021. "A critical review of ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestate of organic wastes via stripping," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Amal Hmaissia & Edgar Martín Hernández & Steve Boivin & Céline Vaneeckhaute, 2025. "Start-Up Strategies for Thermophilic Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digesters: Assessing the Impact of Inoculum Source and Feed Variability on Efficient Waste-to-Energy Conversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Singh, Deval & Tembhare, Mamta & Machhirake, Nitesh & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Biogas generation potential of discarded food waste residue from ultra-processing activities at food manufacturing and packaging industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    5. Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J. & Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Fonoll, X. & Peces, M. & Astals, S., 2014. "A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 412-427.
    6. Seongmin Kang & Joonyoung Roh & Eui-chan Jeon, 2020. "Seasonal Variation Analysis Method of GHG at Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-10, September.
    7. Seongmin Kang & Changsang Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2018. "Fossil Carbon Fraction and Measuring Cycle for Sewage Sludge Waste Incineration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    8. Huang, Zhi & Su, Bosheng & Wang, Yilin & Yuan, Shuo & Huang, Yupeng & Li, Liang & Cai, Jiahao & Chen, Zhiqiang, 2024. "A novel biogas-driven CCHP system based on chemical reinjection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    9. Zhu, Xianpu & Zhang, Yujia & Yellezuome, Dominic & Wang, Zengzhen & Liu, Xuwei & Liu, Ronghou, 2024. "The effects of co-supplemented Fe, Co and Ni on Fe bioavailability and microbial community structure in mesophilic food waste anaerobic digestion by using response surface methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    10. Zhang, Jingxin & Kan, Xiang & Shen, Ye & Loh, Kai-Chee & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "A hybrid biological and thermal waste-to-energy system with heat energy recovery and utilization for solid organic waste treatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 214-222.
    11. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Nandor Csikos & Malte Schwanebeck & Michael Kuhwald & Peter Szilassi & Rainer Duttmann, 2019. "Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Maurizio Bressan & Elena Campagnoli & Carlo Giovanni Ferro & Valter Giaretto, 2023. "A Mass Balance-Based Method for the Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Damaceno, Felippe Martins & Chiarelotto, Maico & Pires Salcedo Restrepo, Juan C. & Buligon, Eduardo Luiz & Costa, Luiz Antonio de Mendonça & de Lucas Junior, Jorge & Costa, Mônica Sarolli Silva de Men, 2019. "Anaerobic co-digestion of sludge cake from poultry slaughtering wastewater treatment and sweet potato: Energy and nutrient recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 489-499.
    15. Tong, Huanhuan & Yao, Zhiyi & Lim, Jun Wei & Mao, Liwei & Zhang, Jingxing & Ge, Tian Shu & Peng, Ying Hong & Wang, Chi-Hwa & Tong, Yen Wah, 2018. "Harvest green energy through energy recovery from waste: A technology review and an assessment of Singapore," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 163-178.
    16. Arnò, Paolo & Fiore, Silvia & Verda, Vittorio, 2017. "Assessment of anaerobic co-digestion in areas with heterogeneous waste production densities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 221-236.
    17. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    18. Chinese, D. & Patrizio, P. & Nardin, G., 2014. "Effects of changes in Italian bioenergy promotion schemes for agricultural biogas projects: Insights from a regional optimization model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-205.
    19. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Zhang, Yufei & Qi, Xianghui, 2020. "Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Bartoli, Andrea & Hamelin, Lorie & Rozakis, Stelios & Borzęcka, Magdalena & Brandão, Miguel, 2019. "Coupling economic and GHG emission accounting models to evaluate the sustainability of biogas policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 133-148.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6147-:d:1694956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.