IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i18p7425-d411257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seasonal Variation Analysis Method of GHG at Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator

Author

Listed:
  • Seongmin Kang

    (Climate Change Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Joonyoung Roh

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

  • Eui-chan Jeon

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)

Abstract

The greenhouse gas emissions of the waste incineration sector account for approximately 43% of the total GHG emissions and represent the majority of the CO 2 emissions from waste in Korea. Improving the reliability of the GHG inventory of the waste incineration sector is an important aspect for the examination of global GHG emission management according to the Paris Agreement. In this study, we introduced a statistical approach to analyze seasonal changes through analysis of waste composition and CO 2 concentration in Municipal Solid Waste incinerators and applied the methodology to one case study facility. The analysis results in the case study showed that there was no seasonal variation in waste composition and CO 2 concentrations, except for wood. Wood is classified as biomass, and the GHG emissions caused by biomass incineration are reported separately, indicating that the effect of an MSW incinerator on GHG emissions is not significant. Therefore, the seasonal effect of CO 2 concentration or waste composition may not be an impact when calculating GHG emissions from case study facilities’ MSW incinerators. This study proposed an approach for analyzing factors that affect the GHG inventory reliability by analyzing seasonal characteristics and variation through the statistical analysis, which are used for the calculation of the GHG emissions of an MSW incinerator.

Suggested Citation

  • Seongmin Kang & Joonyoung Roh & Eui-chan Jeon, 2020. "Seasonal Variation Analysis Method of GHG at Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-10, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7425-:d:411257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. P. Royston, 1982. "Expected Normal Order Statistics (Exact and Approximate)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(2), pages 161-165, June.
    2. Seongmin Kang & Jeahyung Cha & Changsang Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-Chan Jeon, 2020. "Estimation of appropriate CO2 concentration sampling cycle for MSW incinerators," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(3), pages 535-544, May.
    3. Seongmin Kang & Seungjin Kim & Jeongwoo Lee & Youngjae Jeon & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2017. "A Study on Applying Biomass Fraction for Greenhouse Gases Emission Estimation of a Sewage Sludge Incinerator in Korea: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seongmin Kang & Changsang Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2018. "Fossil Carbon Fraction and Measuring Cycle for Sewage Sludge Waste Incineration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Seongmin Kang & Jeahyung Cha & Changsang Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-Chan Jeon, 2020. "Estimation of appropriate CO2 concentration sampling cycle for MSW incinerators," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(3), pages 535-544, May.
    3. Pettigrew Stephen, 2014. "How the West will be won: using Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the effects of NHL realignment," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, September.
    4. Nathan Lassance & Frédéric Vrins, 2021. "Minimum Rényi entropy portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 23-46, April.
    5. G. P. Brorby & P. J. Sheehan & D. W. Berman & K. T. Bogen & S. E. Holm, 2013. "Exposures from Chrysotile‐Containing Joint Compound: Evaluation of New Model Relating Respirable Dust to Fiber Concentrations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 161-176, January.
    6. Daniele Coin, 2017. "A goodness-of-fit test for Generalized Error Distribution," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1096, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Quetzalli Aguilar-Virgen & Paul Taboada-González & Eduardo Baltierra-Trejo & Liliana Marquez-Benavides, 2017. "Cutting GHG Emissions at Student Housing in Central Mexico through Solid Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Run-Peng Wei & Francis C. Yeh, 1999. "Optimal Diversity-Dependent Contributions of Genotypes to Mixtures," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 350-354, June.
    9. Qifan Song & Guang Cheng, 2020. "Bayesian Fusion Estimation via t Shrinkage," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 353-385, August.
    10. Coin, Daniele, 2008. "A goodness-of-fit test for normality based on polynomial regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2185-2198, January.
    11. Karolina Wojtacha-Rychter & Piotr Kucharski & Adam Smolinski, 2021. "Conventional and Alternative Sources of Thermal Energy in the Production of Cement—An Impact on CO 2 Emission," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Zhichao Zheng & Karthik Natarajan & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2016. "Least Squares Approximation to the Distribution of Project Completion Times with Gaussian Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1406-1421, December.
    13. Kenneth T. Bogen, 2013. "Dermal Uptake of 18 Dilute Aqueous Chemicals: In Vivo Disappearance‐Method Measures Greatly Exceed In Vitro‐Based Predictions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(7), pages 1334-1352, July.
    14. Seongmin Kang & Sungheum Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-chan Jeon, 2019. "Comparison of GHG Emission Methods Calculated by Applying Biomass Fraction at Sewage Sludge Incinerators in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Osman, Hany & Demirli, Kudret, 2012. "Integrated safety stock optimization for multiple sourced stockpoints facing variable demand and lead time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 299-307.
    16. John Deke & Mariel Finucane & Daniel Thal, "undated". "The BASIE (BAyeSian Interpretation of Estimates) Framework for Interpreting Findings from Impact Evaluations: A Practical Guide for Education Researchers," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 5a0d5dff375d42048799878be, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:18:p:7425-:d:411257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.