IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6124-d1694441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomim’Index—A New Method Supporting Eco-Design of Cosmetic Products Through Biomimicry

Author

Listed:
  • Anneline Letard

    (Ceebios—Centre d’Expertise en Biomimétisme, 60300 Senlis, France)

  • Mylène Potrel

    (L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France)

  • Eliot Graeff

    (Ceebios—Centre d’Expertise en Biomimétisme, 60300 Senlis, France)

  • Luce-Marie Petit

    (Ceebios—Centre d’Expertise en Biomimétisme, 60300 Senlis, France)

  • Adrien Saint-Sardos

    (Ceebios—Centre d’Expertise en Biomimétisme, 60300 Senlis, France)

  • Marie-Jocelyne Pygmalion

    (L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France)

  • Jacques L’Haridon

    (L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France)

  • Geoffroy Remaut

    (L’Oreal Research and Innovation, 94550 Chevilly-Larue, France)

  • Delphine Bouvier

    (L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France)

Abstract

In the context of climate change, it becomes of utmost importance to limit the negative impact of industrial activities on carbon emissions, water stress, biodiversity loss, and natural resources depletion. Whether we consider the situation from a product-centered perspective (life cycle, R&D&I process, tools, methods, design, production, etc.) or from a human-centered perspective (habits, practices, fixation, strategic orientations, emotional sensitivity, etc.), coming years will represent a formidable upheaval for companies. To support this transition, various tools assessing products’ impact have been developed over the past decade. They aim at guiding decision makers, integrating new criteria to assess project success, and promoting the development and industrialization of solutions answering pressing environmental issues. If assessment is a key factor of success, it has become clear that processes and practices also need to evolve for practitioners to properly integrate sustainable requirements from the initial stages of their project. In that context, biomimicry, the approach aimed at taking nature as a model to support the design of more sustainable solutions, has been the center of growing interest. However, no integrated methods exist in the cosmetics sector to assess if a product is properly developed through biomimicry. This missing framework led to difficulties for cosmetic companies to support eco-design through biomimicry. In this article, we present a method called Biomim’Index developed by L’Oréal research and innovation sustainable development team to address three objectives: (i) to characterize cosmetic technologies according to whether they are based on bioinspiration, biomimetics or biomimicry; (ii) to guide the project’s leaders to identify key steps to improve existing cosmetic technologies through biomimicry; and (iii) to support the integration of biomimicry as an operational approach towards the development of new sustainable cosmetic technologies. This method, focusing on the problem-driven biomimetic approach is based on a combination of procedural requirements from the biomimetics TC288 18458:2015 ISO norm and environmental design requirements from L’Oréal for the Future (L4TF) commitments. Results present a proof of concept to outline the method’s efficiency and limits to support innovative eco-designed projects and value cosmetic technologies designed through biomimicry.

Suggested Citation

  • Anneline Letard & Mylène Potrel & Eliot Graeff & Luce-Marie Petit & Adrien Saint-Sardos & Marie-Jocelyne Pygmalion & Jacques L’Haridon & Geoffroy Remaut & Delphine Bouvier, 2025. "Biomim’Index—A New Method Supporting Eco-Design of Cosmetic Products Through Biomimicry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6124-:d:1694441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nora Amberg & Csaba Fogarassy, 2019. "Green Consumer Behavior in the Cosmetics Market," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Simona Fortunati & Laura Martiniello & Donato Morea, 2020. "The Strategic Role of the Corporate Social Responsibility and Circular Economy in the Cosmetic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, June.
    3. Jacky Chin & Bernard C. Jiang & Ilma Mufidah & Satria Fadil Persada & Bustanul Arifin Noer, 2018. "The Investigation of Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Skincare Products: A Pro-Environmental Behavior Model Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiyong Shim & Jung Woo & Hyerin Yeo & Sujin Kang & Boseong Kwon & Eui Jung Lee & Jooyoung Oh & Euitaek Jeong & Junman Lim & Sun Gyoo Park, 2024. "The Clean Beauty Trend Among Millennial and Generation Z Consumers: Assessing the Safety, Ethicality, and Sustainability Attributes of Cosmetic Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    2. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Donato Morea & Gianpaolo Iazzolino, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and circular economy from the perspective of consumers: A cross‐cultural analysis in the cosmetic industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1226-1243, May.
    3. Camelia Grădinaru & Daniel-Rareș Obadă & Ioan-Alexandru Grădinaru & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Enhancing Sustainable Cosmetics Brand Purchase: A Comprehensive Approach Based on the SOR Model and the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    4. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    5. H.-Ping Tserng & Cheng-Mo Chou & Yun-Tsui Chang, 2021. "The Key Strategies to Implement Circular Economy in Building Projects—A Case Study of Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Yung-Tsan Jou & Charmine Sheena Saflor & Klint Allen Mariñas & Michael Nayat Young, 2023. "Determining Factors Affecting Perceived Customer Satisfaction on Public Utility Bus System in Occidental Mindoro, Philippines: A Case Study on Service Quality Assessment during Major Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Suhaiza Zailani & Yasanur Kayikci & John G. Keogh, 2023. "Examining Knowledge Diffusion in the Circular Economy Domain: a Main Path Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 125-166, March.
    8. Hea Young Lim & Ki Han Kwon, 2023. "Sustainable Assessment of the Environmental Activities of Major Cosmetics and Personal Care Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Arezoo Ghazanfari, 2023. "An Analysis of Circular Economy Literature at the Macro Level, with a Particular Focus on Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Raven Gio Charles A. Bajar & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Josephine D. German, 2024. "Determining Sustainable Purchase Behavior for Green Products from Name-Brand Shops: A Gen Z Perspective in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Yam B. Limbu & A. F. M. Jalal Ahamed, 2023. "What Influences Green Cosmetics Purchase Intention and Behavior? A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Dolores Gallardo‐Vázquez & Inna Choban de Sousa Paiva & Cristina Nuevo‐Gallardo, 2025. "Exploring the role of sustainability reporting strategies in promoting sustainable development in social economy entities: The circular economy as a mediator," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2902-2925, April.
    13. Hinrika Droege & Andrea Raggi & Tomás B. Ramos, 2021. "Overcoming Current Challenges for Circular Economy Assessment Implementation in Public Sector Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Elías Domingo‐Posada & Pilar L. González‐Torre & Marta M. Vidal‐Suárez, 2024. "Sustainable development goals and corporate strategy: A map of the field," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2733-2748, July.
    15. Mathivathanan, Deepak & Mathiyazhagan, K. & Khorana, Sangeeta & Rana, Nripendra P. & Arora, Bimal, 2022. "Drivers of circular economy for small and medium enterprises: Case study on the Indian state of Tamil Nadu," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 997-1015.
    16. Zhejun Min & Sukanlaya Sawang & Robbert A. Kivits, 2021. "Proposing Circular Economy Ecosystem for Chinese SMEs: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Yam B. Limbu & Long Pham & Thuy Thi Thu Nguyen, 2022. "Predictors of Green Cosmetics Purchase Intentions among Young Female Consumers in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Bożena Kusz & Lucyna Witek & Dariusz Kusz & Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska & Paulina Ostyńska & Alina Walenia, 2023. "The Effect of COVID-19 on Food Consumers’ Channel Purchasing Behaviors: An Empirical Study from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Saeed Gholamrezai & Vahid Aliabadi & Pouria Ataei, 2021. "Understanding the pro-environmental behavior among green poultry farmers: Application of behavioral theories," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16100-16118, November.
    20. Eunyoung Choi & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Effect of Trust in Domain-Specific Information of Safety, Brand Loyalty, and Perceived Value for Cosmetics on Purchase Intentions in Mobile E-Commerce Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6124-:d:1694441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.