IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13286-d1232988.html

Sustainable Assessment of the Environmental Activities of Major Cosmetics and Personal Care Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Hea Young Lim

    (Division of Beauty Arts Care, Department of Beauty Arts Care, Graduate School, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
    Amorepacific Co., Seoul 04386, Republic of Korea)

  • Ki Han Kwon

    (College of General Education, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The cosmetics and personal care industry has, by its nature, contributed to global environmental issues such as climate change, waste, water scarcity, habitat destruction, and water and air pollution. Therefore, it is more important than ever for the cosmetics and personal care companies to be responsible and proactive in addressing environmental issues. Meanwhile, the complexity of the cosmetics and personal care industry has never been greater. The roles of not only brand companies but also OEM/ODM and retail companies are becoming increasingly important, and the boundaries are also collapsing. Despite the urgency of environmental issues, there has been a lack of research on specific and practical environmental activities of cosmetics and personal care companies, and the environmental responsibilities of OEM/ODM companies and retailers have been overlooked. Therefore, the need for this study was recognized. The purpose of this study was to expand the scope of assessment to include not only cosmetics brand companies but also OEM/ODM companies and retailers in general to identify the actual and concrete environmental activities being carried out. Therefore, in this study, the keywords cosmetics, environmental, eco-friendly, and sustainable, which have recently become the topics of discussion, were empirically analyzed. This study selected and analyzed 18 out of 28 annual reports, nonfinancial statements, and sustainability reports of 16 cosmetics- and personal-care-related companies. In addition, 456 articles were found through PubMed, Google Scholar, Google, and Scopus, and the final 108 articles were referenced using the PRISMA flow chart. The novelty of this study is, first, in the fact that it identified the actual and specific strategies and practices of cosmetics and personal care companies with respect to environmental issues. Second, it established common standards for environmental issues and compared corporate environmental activities. Third, this study included OEM/ODM companies and retailers, whose influence has been increasing in recent years, to understand the status of eco-friendly activities across the industry. This study makes a practical contribution by encouraging environmental activities in the cosmetics industry through comparing and evaluating the specific and practical environmental activities of not only brand companies but also OEM/ODM companies and retailers and laying the foundation for the development of a framework for environmental assessment. In addition, this study recognizes the need to study the environmental activity behavior of the cosmetics industry as a whole and contributes to the study of cosmetics companies’ environmental activities by suggesting how to use companies’ nonfinancial performance reports as materials to assess their actual environmental activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hea Young Lim & Ki Han Kwon, 2023. "Sustainable Assessment of the Environmental Activities of Major Cosmetics and Personal Care Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13286-:d:1232988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noémi Nemes & Stephen J. Scanlan & Pete Smith & Tone Smith & Melissa Aronczyk & Stephanie Hill & Simon L. Lewis & A. Wren Montgomery & Francesco N. Tubiello & Doreen Stabinsky, 2022. "An Integrated Framework to Assess Greenwashing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Alessio Baratta & Antonio Cimino & Francesco Longo & Vittorio Solina & Saverino Verteramo, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Practices in Industry with a Focus on Carbon Emissions: Insights and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Zhongming Ren & Doudou Zhang & Zhu Gao, 2022. "Sustainable Design Strategy of Cosmetic Packaging in China Based on Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    4. P. Marijn Poortvliet & Meredith T. Niles & Jeroen A. Veraart & Saskia E. Werners & Fiona C. Korporaal & Bob C. Mulder, 2020. "Communicating Climate Change Risk: A Content Analysis of IPCC’s Summary for Policymakers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Riccardo Tiscini & Laura Martiniello & Rosa Lombardi, 2022. "Circular economy and environmental disclosure in sustainability reports: Empirical evidence in cosmetic companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 892-907, March.
    6. Astrid Sailer & Harald Wilfing & Eva Straus, 2022. "Greenwashing and Bluewashing in Black Friday-Related Sustainable Fashion Marketing on Instagram," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Soo Ran Won & Young Sung Ghim & Jeonghoon Kim & Jungmin Ryu & In-Keun Shim & Jongchun Lee, 2021. "Volatile Organic Compounds in Underground Shopping Districts in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Simona Fortunati & Laura Martiniello & Donato Morea, 2020. "The Strategic Role of the Corporate Social Responsibility and Circular Economy in the Cosmetic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, June.
    9. Camelia Grădinaru & Daniel-Rareș Obadă & Ioan-Alexandru Grădinaru & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Enhancing Sustainable Cosmetics Brand Purchase: A Comprehensive Approach Based on the SOR Model and the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Yanqi Sun, 2023. "Can the innovation in sustainability disclosures reflect organisational sustainable development? An integrated reporting perspective from China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1668-1680, June.
    11. Sara Bom & Helena Margarida Ribeiro & Joana Marto, 2020. "Sustainability Calculator: A Tool to Assess Sustainability in Cosmetic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Michal Patak & Lenka Branska & Zuzana Pecinova, 2021. "Consumer Intention to Purchase Green Consumer Chemicals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noha Alziny & Fadya M. Elgarhy & Ayan Musa Mohamed & Hager Yehia Shalaby & Noran Nounou & Omnia Soliman & Anwar Abdelnaser, 2025. "The Impact of Microplastics in Food and Drugs on Human Health: A Review of the MENA Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Donato Morea & Gianpaolo Iazzolino, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and circular economy from the perspective of consumers: A cross‐cultural analysis in the cosmetic industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1226-1243, May.
    2. Camelia Grădinaru & Daniel-Rareș Obadă & Ioan-Alexandru Grădinaru & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Enhancing Sustainable Cosmetics Brand Purchase: A Comprehensive Approach Based on the SOR Model and the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Alice Mondello & Roberta Salomone & Giovanni Mondello, 2025. "Circular Economy in the Cosmetic Sector: Insights from Selected Italian Companies," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 2703-2723, August.
    4. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    5. H.-Ping Tserng & Cheng-Mo Chou & Yun-Tsui Chang, 2021. "The Key Strategies to Implement Circular Economy in Building Projects—A Case Study of Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Karol Dabrowski & Katarzyna Skrzypek & Daria Moskwa - Beczkowska, 2025. "Orders for Sustainability Reports – A New Phenomenon in Manufacturing Companies in the Metal and Automotive Industries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 659-673.
    7. Seyi Stephen & Clinton Aigbavboa, 2025. "Enhancing Academia–Industry Partnerships for Sustainable Building: A Change Framework for Research and Innovation Integration in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-33, April.
    8. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Suhaiza Zailani & Yasanur Kayikci & John G. Keogh, 2023. "Examining Knowledge Diffusion in the Circular Economy Domain: a Main Path Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 125-166, March.
    9. Antonios Persakis & Theodoros Nikolopoulos & Ioannis C. Negkakis & Athanasios Pavlopoulos, 2025. "Greenwashing in marketing: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(4), pages 957-992, December.
    10. Miriam Tiutiu & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Maria Carmen Pantea & Mihai Felea, "undated". "Artificial Intelligence Implications in Retail in the New Normal: A Qualitative Approach," BASIQ Conference Proceedings 2023:040, Bucharest University of Economic Studies.
    11. Yidong Liu & Yongxin Wu & Xichen Feng & Euitay Jung, 2025. "A Study on the Driving Factors of Continued Use of Sustainable Ready-to-Drink Packaging: The Moderating Roles of Perceived Sustainability and Perceived Value Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Arezoo Ghazanfari, 2023. "An Analysis of Circular Economy Literature at the Macro Level, with a Particular Focus on Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Muzhen Li & RayeCarol Cavender & Min-Young Lee, 2025. "Consumer Awareness of Fashion Greenwashing: Insights from Social Media Discussions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Booth, Hollie & Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Starkey, Malcolm, 2023. "Operationalizing transformative change for business in the context of nature positive," OSF Preprints vk2hq, Center for Open Science.
    15. Yam B. Limbu & A. F. M. Jalal Ahamed, 2023. "What Influences Green Cosmetics Purchase Intention and Behavior? A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Jun Wan & Yuejia Wang & Yuan Wang, 2025. "Promoting or Hindering: The Impact of ESG Rating Differences on Energy Enterprises’ Green Transformation—A Causal Test from Double Machine-Learning Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Photini Vrikki, 2024. "Measuring Up? The Illusion of Sustainability and the Limits of Big Tech Self-Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Bartlomiej Gawin & Jacek Winiarski & Bartosz Marcinkowski, 2025. "Pro‐environmental action plan for managers of distributed service facilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 729-740, January.
    19. Celia Rangel-Pérez & Belen López & Manuel Fernández, 2024. "A strategic sustainability model for global luxury companies in the management of CO2 emissions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1597-1615, September.
    20. Magdalena Stefańska & Iwona Olejnik, 2024. "Retailers’ social impact perspective–discrepancies between theory and practice," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 51(3), pages 355-368, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13286-:d:1232988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.