IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5904-d1688532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing Sustainable and Traditional Public Transportation Alternatives Using a Novel Decision-Making Framework Considering Passengers’ Travel Behaviors: A Case Study of Istanbul

Author

Listed:
  • Pelin Büşra Şimşek

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55139, Türkiye)

  • Akın Özdemir

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55139, Türkiye)

  • Selahattin Kosunalp

    (Department of Computer Technologies, Gönen Vocational School, Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Bandırma 10200, Türkiye)

  • Teodor Iliev

    (Department of Telecommunications, University of Ruse, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria)

Abstract

A public transportation system consists of complex processes and requires comprehensive planning activities for a city when dealing with the travel behavior decisions of passengers. Travel behavior decisions are important in selecting suitable transportation alternatives for passengers. In the literature, little attention has been paid to prioritizing the criteria and ranking the alternatives for assessing sustainable and traditional public transportation modes when considering the travel behavior decisions of passengers. In this paper, a five-phased novel decision analysis framework, including Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and VIekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) techniques, is proposed to evaluate the alternatives. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, the novel decision-making framework in this paper has not been employed before to assess sustainable transportation alternatives dealing with the travel behavior decisions of passengers. Next, the thirteen criteria are specified, including economics, safety, travel quality, and environmental and health aspects, to analyze the travel behavior decisions of passengers with regard to the experts’ notions, published reports, and papers. Then, the seven public transportation alternatives are determined, including sustainable and traditional transportation modes. A case study was carried out in Istanbul, Türkiye. Based on the results, service frequency, the vehicle type and its mechanism, and ease of accessibility were found to be the top three significant criteria that affect travel behavior decisions. Furthermore, metro, Marmaray, and metrobus are the top three public transportation alternatives. In addition, the results were verified. Moreover, managerial and theoretical recommendations are provided to policymakers. Lastly, sustainable development goals 11.2 and 11.b can be achieved by designing an accessible, affordable, environmentally friendly, safe, and sustainable public transportation system when analyzing the travel behavior decisions of passengers.

Suggested Citation

  • Pelin Büşra Şimşek & Akın Özdemir & Selahattin Kosunalp & Teodor Iliev, 2025. "Choosing Sustainable and Traditional Public Transportation Alternatives Using a Novel Decision-Making Framework Considering Passengers’ Travel Behaviors: A Case Study of Istanbul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5904-:d:1688532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5904-:d:1688532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.