IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5904-d1688532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing Sustainable and Traditional Public Transportation Alternatives Using a Novel Decision-Making Framework Considering Passengers’ Travel Behaviors: A Case Study of Istanbul

Author

Listed:
  • Pelin Büşra Şimşek

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55139, Türkiye)

  • Akın Özdemir

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55139, Türkiye)

  • Selahattin Kosunalp

    (Department of Computer Technologies, Gönen Vocational School, Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University, Bandırma 10200, Türkiye)

  • Teodor Iliev

    (Department of Telecommunications, University of Ruse, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria)

Abstract

A public transportation system consists of complex processes and requires comprehensive planning activities for a city when dealing with the travel behavior decisions of passengers. Travel behavior decisions are important in selecting suitable transportation alternatives for passengers. In the literature, little attention has been paid to prioritizing the criteria and ranking the alternatives for assessing sustainable and traditional public transportation modes when considering the travel behavior decisions of passengers. In this paper, a five-phased novel decision analysis framework, including Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and VIekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) techniques, is proposed to evaluate the alternatives. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, the novel decision-making framework in this paper has not been employed before to assess sustainable transportation alternatives dealing with the travel behavior decisions of passengers. Next, the thirteen criteria are specified, including economics, safety, travel quality, and environmental and health aspects, to analyze the travel behavior decisions of passengers with regard to the experts’ notions, published reports, and papers. Then, the seven public transportation alternatives are determined, including sustainable and traditional transportation modes. A case study was carried out in Istanbul, Türkiye. Based on the results, service frequency, the vehicle type and its mechanism, and ease of accessibility were found to be the top three significant criteria that affect travel behavior decisions. Furthermore, metro, Marmaray, and metrobus are the top three public transportation alternatives. In addition, the results were verified. Moreover, managerial and theoretical recommendations are provided to policymakers. Lastly, sustainable development goals 11.2 and 11.b can be achieved by designing an accessible, affordable, environmentally friendly, safe, and sustainable public transportation system when analyzing the travel behavior decisions of passengers.

Suggested Citation

  • Pelin Büşra Şimşek & Akın Özdemir & Selahattin Kosunalp & Teodor Iliev, 2025. "Choosing Sustainable and Traditional Public Transportation Alternatives Using a Novel Decision-Making Framework Considering Passengers’ Travel Behaviors: A Case Study of Istanbul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5904-:d:1688532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Derbel & Younes Boujelbene, 2023. "Performance classification of Tunisian public transport operators," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 535-574, June.
    2. Pradip Kundu & Ömer Faruk Görçün & Chandra Prakash Garg & Hande Küçükönder & Mustafa Çanakçıoğlu, 2024. "Evaluation of public transportation systems for sustainable cities using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27655-27684, November.
    3. Madjid Tavana & Mehdi Soltanifar & Francisco J. Santos-Arteaga, 2023. "Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 879-907, July.
    4. Ahmad Alkharabsheh & Sarbast Moslem & Laila Oubahman & Szabolcs Duleba, 2021. "An Integrated Approach of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Grey Theory for Evaluating Urban Public Transportation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Johanna Camargo Pérez & Martha Carrillo & Jairo Montoya-Torres, 2015. "Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 69-87, March.
    6. Margareta Friman & Katrin Lättman & Lars E. Olsson, 2020. "Public Transport Quality, Safety, and Perceived Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Mouwen, Arnoud, 2015. "Drivers of customer satisfaction with public transport services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-20.
    8. Forman, Ernest & Peniwati, Kirti, 1998. "Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 165-169, July.
    9. Borghetti, Fabio & Carra, Martina & Besson, Carlotta & Matarrese, Elisabetta & Maja, Roberto & Barabino, Benedetto, 2024. "Evaluating alternative fuels for a bus fleet: An Italian case," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-15.
    10. Syeda Narmeen Zehra & Stephen D. Wong, 2024. "Systematic review and research gaps on wildfire evacuations: infrastructure, transportation modes, networks, and planning," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1364-1398, November.
    11. Yedla, Sudhakar & Shrestha, Ram M., 2003. "Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 717-729, October.
    12. Lee, Deok-Joo, 2018. "A multi-criteria approach for prioritizing advanced public transport modes (APTM) considering urban types in Korea," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 148-161.
    13. Chunguang Bai & Behnam Fahimnia & Joseph Sarkis, 2017. "Sustainable transport fleet appraisal using a hybrid multi-objective decision making approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 309-340, March.
    14. Gülçin Canbulut & Erkan Köse & Oğuzhan Ahmet Arik, 2022. "Public transportation vehicle selection by the grey relational analysis method," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 367-384, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nassereddine, M. & Eskandari, H., 2017. "An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 427-439.
    2. Nikoleta Mikušová & Gabriel Fedorko & Vieroslav Molnár & Martina Hlatká & Rudolf Kampf & Veronika Sirková, 2021. "Possibility of a Solution of the Sustainability of Transport and Mobility with the Application of Discrete Computer Simulation—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Szabolcs Duleba & Ahmad Alkharabsheh & Fatma Kutlu Gündoğdu, 2022. "Creating a common priority vector in intuitionistic fuzzy AHP: a comparison of entropy-based and distance-based models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 163-187, November.
    4. Swati Goyal & Shivi Agarwal & Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh & Trilok Mathur & Nirbhay Mathur, 2022. "Analysis of Hybrid MCDM Methods for the Performance Assessment and Ranking Public Transport Sector: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Judit Oláh & József Popp & Szabolcs Duleba & Anna Kiss & Zoltán Lakner, 2021. "Positioning Bio-Based Energy Systems in a Hypercomplex Decision Space—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Baudry, Gino & Macharis, Cathy & Vallée, Thomas, 2018. "Range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis: A combined method of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 257-269.
    7. Pradip Kundu & Ömer Faruk Görçün & Chandra Prakash Garg & Hande Küçükönder & Mustafa Çanakçıoğlu, 2024. "Evaluation of public transportation systems for sustainable cities using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27655-27684, November.
    8. Tsigdinos, Stefanos & Paraskevopoulos, Yannis & Tzouras, Panagiotis G. & Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos, 2024. "Development of a complete method for re-conceptualizing street classification in an urban municipality," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    9. Alba Gómez-Ortega & Sandra Flores-Ureba & Vera Gelashvili & María Luisa Delgado Jalón, 2024. "Users’ perception for innovation and sustainability management: evidence from public transport," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 859-882, March.
    10. Dharmalingam Marimuthu & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Ghanshaym S. Mahapatra & Renata Činčikaitė & Pratik Roy & Aidas Vasilis Vasiliauskas, 2022. "Sustainable Urban Conveyance Selection through MCGDM Using a New Ranking on Generalized Interval Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Gao, Sa & Ran, Qingsong & Su, Zicheng & Wang, Ling & Ma, Wanjing & Hao, Ruochen, 2024. "Evaluation system for urban traffic intelligence based on travel experiences: A sentiment analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Mustafa Hamurcu & Tamer Eren, 2020. "Strategic Planning Based on Sustainability for Urban Transportation: An Application to Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Mustafa Hamurcu & Tamer Eren, 2020. "Electric Bus Selection with Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Green Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Karzan Ismael & Szabolcs Duleba, 2021. "Investigation of the Relationship between the Perceived Public Transport Service Quality and Satisfaction: A PLS-SEM Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Lee, Deok-Joo, 2018. "A multi-criteria approach for prioritizing advanced public transport modes (APTM) considering urban types in Korea," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 148-161.
    16. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    17. Hamid Mahmood Gelaidan & Abdullah Al-Swidi & Muhammad Haroon Hafeez, 2023. "Studying the Joint Effects of Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Benefits, and Environmental Concerns in Sustainable Travel Behavior: Extending the TPB," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Pablo Aragonés‐Beltrán & Mª. Carmen González‐Cruz & Astrid León‐Camargo & Rosario Viñoles‐Cebolla, 2023. "Assessment of regional development needs according to criteria based on the Sustainable Development Goals in the Meta Region (Colombia)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1101-1121, April.
    19. Maciej Kozłowski & Andrzej Czerepicki, 2025. "Operational Energy Consumption Map for Urban Electric Buses: Case Study for Warsaw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Borhan, Muhamad Nazri & Ibrahim, Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi & Miskeen, Manssour A. Abdulasalm, 2019. "Extending the theory of planned behaviour to predict the intention to take the new high-speed rail for intercity travel in Libya: Assessment of the influence of novelty seeking, trust and external inf," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 373-384.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5904-:d:1688532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.