IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5816-d1686256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Concept of a Waste-Fired Zero-Emission Integrated Gasification Static Cycle Power Plant

Author

Listed:
  • Augusto Montisci

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Aiman Rashid

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
    Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

The layout of an urban waste-fired zero-emission power plant is described in this paper. The principle layout, which is based on similar coal-fired plants retrieved from the literature, integrates gasification with a power-generation section and implements two parallel conversion processes: one relies on the heat developed in the gasifier and consists of a thermoacoustic-magnetohydrodynamic (TA-MHD) generator; the other involves treating syngas to obtain almost pure hydrogen, which is then fed to fuel cells. The CO 2 derived from the oxidation of Carbon is stocked in liquid form. The novelty of the proposed layout lies in the fact that the entire conversion is performed using static equipment. The resulting plant prevents the release of any type of emissions in the atmosphere and increases mechanical efficiency, compared to traditional plants—thanks to the absence of moving parts—resolving, nonetheless, the ever-increasing waste-related pollution issue. A case study of a Union of Municipalities in Southern Lebanon is considered. The ideal cycle handles 65 tons/day of urban waste and is capable of generating 7.71 MW of electric power, with a global efficiency of 52.39%.

Suggested Citation

  • Augusto Montisci & Aiman Rashid, 2025. "Process Concept of a Waste-Fired Zero-Emission Integrated Gasification Static Cycle Power Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5816-:d:1686256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arturs Brekis & Antoine Alemany & Olivier Alemany & Augusto Montisci, 2021. "Space Thermoacoustic Radioisotopic Power System, SpaceTRIPS: The Magnetohydrodynamic Generator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Murphy, J.D. & McKeogh, E., 2004. "Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1043-1057.
    3. Sara Carcangiu & Alessandra Fanni & Augusto Montisci, 2022. "Optimal Design of an Inductive MHD Electric Generator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Eshet, Tzipi & Ayalon, Ofira & Shechter, Mordechai, 2006. "Valuation of externalities of selected waste management alternatives: A comparative review and analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 335-364.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rubí Medina-Mijangos & Luis Seguí-Amórtegui, 2020. "Research Trends in the Economic Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1980 to 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Murphy, J.D. & Power, N., 2009. "Technical and economic analysis of biogas production in Ireland utilising three different crop rotations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 25-36, January.
    3. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Dassisti, Michele & Marković, Danijel & Vučković, Goran, 2014. "Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 190-201.
    4. Katarina Pegg & Grant Wilson & Bushra Al-Duri, 2025. "Exploring Trigeneration in MSW Gasification: An Energy Recovery Potential Study Using Monte Carlo Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Singlitico, Alessandro & Goggins, Jamie & Monaghan, Rory F.D., 2018. "Evaluation of the potential and geospatial distribution of waste and residues for bio-SNG production: A case study for the Republic of Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 288-301.
    6. Ouda, O.K.M. & Raza, S.A. & Nizami, A.S. & Rehan, M. & Al-Waked, R. & Korres, N.E., 2016. "Waste to energy potential: A case study of Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 328-340.
    7. El Hanandeh, Ali & El Zein, Abbas, 2011. "Are the aims of increasing the share of green electricity generation and reducing GHG emissions always compatible?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3031-3036.
    8. Maghanki, Maryam Mohammadi & Ghobadian, Barat & Najafi, Gholamhassan & Galogah, Reza Janzadeh, 2013. "Micro combined heat and power (MCHP) technologies and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 510-524.
    9. Münster, Marie & Meibom, Peter, 2011. "Optimization of use of waste in the future energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1612-1622.
    10. Deshmukh, M.K. & Deshmukh, S.S., 2008. "Modeling of hybrid renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 235-249, January.
    11. Longden, David & Brammer, John & Bastin, Lucy & Cooper, Nic, 2007. "Distributed or centralised energy-from-waste policy? Implications of technology and scale at municipal level," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2622-2634, April.
    12. Hita, Idoia & Arabiourrutia, Miriam & Olazar, Martin & Bilbao, Javier & Arandes, José María & Castaño, Pedro, 2016. "Opportunities and barriers for producing high quality fuels from the pyrolysis of scrap tires," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 745-759.
    13. Menikpura, S.N.M. & Basnayake, B.F.A., 2009. "New applications of ‘Hess Law’ and comparisons with models for determining calorific values of municipal solid wastes in the Sri Lankan context," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1587-1594.
    14. Qin, Yu & Wu, Jing & Xiao, Benyi & Cong, Ming & Hojo, Toshimasa & Cheng, Jun & Li, Yu-You, 2019. "Strategy of adjusting recirculation ratio for biohythane production via recirculated temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of food waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1235-1245.
    15. Vuk Petronijević & Aleksandar Đorđević & Miladin Stefanović & Slavko Arsovski & Zdravko Krivokapić & Milan Mišić, 2020. "Energy Recovery through End-of-Life Vehicles Recycling in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-26, October.
    16. Escalante, Edwin Santiago Rios & Ramos, Luth Silva & Rodriguez Coronado, Christian J. & de Carvalho Júnior, João Andrade, 2022. "Evaluation of the potential feedstock for biojet fuel production: Focus in the Brazilian context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    17. Estefani Rondón Toro & Ana López Martínez & Amaya Lobo García de Cortázar, 2023. "Sequential Methodology for the Selection of Municipal Waste Treatment Alternatives Applied to a Case Study in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Raj, N. Thilak & Iniyan, S. & Goic, Ranko, 2011. "A review of renewable energy based cogeneration technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3640-3648.
    19. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2013. "Vision 2023: Assessing the feasibility of electricity and biogas production from municipal solid waste in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 52-63.
    20. Jeeban Poudel & Ja Hyung Choi & Sea Cheon Oh, 2019. "Process Design Characteristics of Syngas (CO/H 2 ) Separation Using Composite Membrane," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5816-:d:1686256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.