IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5792-d1685963.html

Hybrid Intersection: Navigating Context and Constraint in AI for Social Good Among Thailand’s Smallholder Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Putthiphan Hirunyatrakul

    (Institute of Global Prosperity, University College London, 149 Tottenham Ct Rd, London W1T 7NE, UK)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly deployed as a vehicle for “social good” in agriculture, ostensibly advancing the UN Sustainable Development Goals whilst uplifting smallholders. This study examines how such claims materialise through a selective case study analysis of eleven Thai Agricultural AI providers, analysing governance practices and impact framing. The research develops the “hybrid intersection” concept as an analytical lens for understanding how Agricultural AI simultaneously delivers genuine social benefits whilst reproducing structural constraints that limit transformative change. Findings reveal that “social good” becomes operationalised primarily through economic gains, reflecting farmers’ immediate financial predicament and market-driven innovation constraints. Governance practices prioritise functional trust over procedural safeguards, reflecting institutional pressures to demonstrate immediate value. The study reveals two systemic tensions: data commodification models enabling free farmer access whilst extracting behavioural surplus for third-party monetisation, and market optimisation approaches delivering incremental improvements whilst leaving structural challenges unaddressed. Thailand’s Agricultural AI landscape thus embodies a “hybrid intersection” where genuine social good coexists with constrained transformation, providing analytical tools for understanding similar patterns in other Southern contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Putthiphan Hirunyatrakul, 2025. "Hybrid Intersection: Navigating Context and Constraint in AI for Social Good Among Thailand’s Smallholder Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-37, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5792-:d:1685963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sayamol Charoenratana & Cholnapa Anukul & Peter M. Rosset, 2021. "Food Sovereignty and Food Security: Livelihood Strategies Pursued by Farmers during the Maize Monoculture Boom in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Sarah Hackfort, 2021. "Patterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Viera Magalhães, João & Couldry, Nick, 2021. "Giving by taking away: big tech, data colonialism and the reconfiguration of social good," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107516, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Emily Duncan & Alesandros Glaros & Dennis Z. Ross & Eric Nost, 2021. "New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 1181-1199, December.
    5. Amorn Pochanasomboon & Witsanu Attavanich & Akaranant Kidsom, 2020. "Impacts of Land Ownership on the Economic Performance and Viability of Rice Farming in Thailand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Para Jansuwan & Kerstin K. Zander, 2021. "Getting Young People to Farm: How Effective Is Thailand’s Young Smart Farmer Programme?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Daniel S. Schiff, 2023. "Looking through a policy window with tinted glasses: Setting the agenda for U.S. AI policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(5), pages 729-756, September.
    8. Veerayooth Kanchoochat, 2023. "Siamese Twin Troubles: Structural and Regulatory Transformations in Unequal Thailand," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 47-68, January.
    9. repec:osf:socarx:ustxg_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Veale, Michael & Binns, Reuben, 2017. "Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data," SocArXiv ustxg, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasios Michailidis & Chrysanthi Charatsari & Thomas Bournaris & Efstratios Loizou & Aikaterini Paltaki & Dimitra Lazaridou & Evagelos D. Lioutas, 2024. "A First View on the Competencies and Training Needs of Farmers Working with and Researchers Working on Precision Agriculture Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Xi, Yipeng & Mai, Luu Thuc Ngan, 2025. "Shifting tides: How public perceptions of GPT regulation evolved before and after GPT-4 on Quora," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    3. McGrath, Karen & Brown, Claire & Regan, Áine & Russell, Tomás, 2023. "Investigating narratives and trends in digital agriculture: A scoping study of social and behavioural science studies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Kristina Beethem & Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt & Jennifer Lai & Tian Guo, 2023. "Navigating the information landscape: public and private information source access by midwest farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1117-1135, September.
    5. Harika Meesala & Gianluca Brunori, 2025. "Dynamics of Using Digital Technologies in Agroecological Settings: A Case Study Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    7. Sarah Ruth Sippel, 2023. "Tackling land’s ‘stubborn materiality’: the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 849-863, September.
    8. Ollendorf, Franziska & Sieber, Stefan & Löhr, Katharina, 2023. "Societal dynamics of sustainability certification in Ghanaian cocoa producing communities: Assessing social cohesion effects and their implications for collective action," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 212-238.
    9. Snow, Stephen & Fielke, Simon & Fleming, Aysha & Jakku, Emma & Malakar, Yuwan & Turner, Charles & Hunter, Tammy & Tijs, Sigrid & Bonnett, Graham, 2024. "Climate services for agriculture: Steering towards inclusive innovation in Australian climate services design and delivery," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. John Strauser & William P. Stewart, 2024. "Moving beyond production: community narratives for good farming," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 1195-1210, September.
    11. Richard F. Doner, 2023. "Comment on “Siamese Twin Failures: Structural and Regulatory Transformations in Unequal Thailand”," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 71-72, January.
    12. Karahan, Mizgin & Abay, Canan & Ito, Ryoji, 2023. "Determining Factors of Retaining Young Farmers in Agriculture: A Case study in Turkey and Japan," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(2), June.
    13. Abdullah Al Fraidan, 2025. "Procedural Transparency and Legal Accountability to Sustain AI-Mediated Language Assessment in Saudi Arabia," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    14. repec:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:10:p:1647-1656 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Nasiphi Vusokazi Bontsa & Abbyssinia Mushunje & Saul Ngarava, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Perceptions of Smallholder Farmers towards Adoption of Digital Technologies in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Matthew Canfield & Barbara Ntambirweki, 2024. "Datafying African Agriculture: From Data Governance to Farmers’ Rights," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 67(1), pages 5-13, June.
    17. Ruiqing Miao & Recep Ulucak & David Zilberman, 2024. "Public agricultural research, political economy, and climate change: A literature review," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 954-982, September.
    18. Veale, Michael & Binns, Reuben & Van Kleek, Max, 2018. "Some HCI Priorities for GDPR-Compliant Machine Learning," LawArchive wm6yk_v1, Center for Open Science.
    19. Jongheon Kim, 2023. "Traveling AI‐essentialism and national AI strategies: A comparison between South Korea and France," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(5), pages 705-728, September.
    20. Sarah-Louise Ruder & Hannah Wittman & Emily Duncan & Terre Satterfield, 2025. "Sociotechnical imaginaries for Canadian agri-food futures: a farmer survey," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 1439-1456, September.
    21. Julie Guthman & Michaelanne Butler, 2023. "Fixing food with a limited menu: on (digital) solutionism in the agri-food tech sector," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 835-848, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5792-:d:1685963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.