IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5792-d1685963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Intersection: Navigating Context and Constraint in AI for Social Good Among Thailand’s Smallholder Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Putthiphan Hirunyatrakul

    (Institute of Global Prosperity, University College London, 149 Tottenham Ct Rd, London W1T 7NE, UK)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly deployed as a vehicle for “social good” in agriculture, ostensibly advancing the UN Sustainable Development Goals whilst uplifting smallholders. This study examines how such claims materialise through a selective case study analysis of eleven Thai Agricultural AI providers, analysing governance practices and impact framing. The research develops the “hybrid intersection” concept as an analytical lens for understanding how Agricultural AI simultaneously delivers genuine social benefits whilst reproducing structural constraints that limit transformative change. Findings reveal that “social good” becomes operationalised primarily through economic gains, reflecting farmers’ immediate financial predicament and market-driven innovation constraints. Governance practices prioritise functional trust over procedural safeguards, reflecting institutional pressures to demonstrate immediate value. The study reveals two systemic tensions: data commodification models enabling free farmer access whilst extracting behavioural surplus for third-party monetisation, and market optimisation approaches delivering incremental improvements whilst leaving structural challenges unaddressed. Thailand’s Agricultural AI landscape thus embodies a “hybrid intersection” where genuine social good coexists with constrained transformation, providing analytical tools for understanding similar patterns in other Southern contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Putthiphan Hirunyatrakul, 2025. "Hybrid Intersection: Navigating Context and Constraint in AI for Social Good Among Thailand’s Smallholder Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-37, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5792-:d:1685963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sayamol Charoenratana & Cholnapa Anukul & Peter M. Rosset, 2021. "Food Sovereignty and Food Security: Livelihood Strategies Pursued by Farmers during the Maize Monoculture Boom in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Veerayooth Kanchoochat, 2023. "Siamese Twin Troubles: Structural and Regulatory Transformations in Unequal Thailand," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 47-68, January.
    3. Sarah Hackfort, 2021. "Patterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Viera Magalhães, João & Couldry, Nick, 2021. "Giving by taking away: big tech, data colonialism and the reconfiguration of social good," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107516, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:ustxg_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Emily Duncan & Alesandros Glaros & Dennis Z. Ross & Eric Nost, 2021. "New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 1181-1199, December.
    7. Amorn Pochanasomboon & Witsanu Attavanich & Akaranant Kidsom, 2020. "Impacts of Land Ownership on the Economic Performance and Viability of Rice Farming in Thailand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Para Jansuwan & Kerstin K. Zander, 2021. "Getting Young People to Farm: How Effective Is Thailand’s Young Smart Farmer Programme?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Daniel S. Schiff, 2023. "Looking through a policy window with tinted glasses: Setting the agenda for U.S. AI policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(5), pages 729-756, September.
    10. Veale, Michael & Binns, Reuben, 2017. "Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data," SocArXiv ustxg, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasios Michailidis & Chrysanthi Charatsari & Thomas Bournaris & Efstratios Loizou & Aikaterini Paltaki & Dimitra Lazaridou & Evagelos D. Lioutas, 2024. "A First View on the Competencies and Training Needs of Farmers Working with and Researchers Working on Precision Agriculture Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Mercado, Rogelio & Park, Cyn-Young & Zhuang, Juzhong, 2024. "Trends and drivers of income inequality in the Philippines, Thailand, and Viet Nam since the early 2000s: A decomposition analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. McGrath, Karen & Brown, Claire & Regan, Áine & Russell, Tomás, 2023. "Investigating narratives and trends in digital agriculture: A scoping study of social and behavioural science studies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    4. Luis Cadavid & Vivek Arulnathan & Nathan Pelletier, 2024. "Food Security and Food Sovereignty: A Review of Commonly Used Indicators and Consideration of Environmental Sustainability Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Kristina Beethem & Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt & Jennifer Lai & Tian Guo, 2023. "Navigating the information landscape: public and private information source access by midwest farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1117-1135, September.
    6. Giagnocavo, Cynthia & Duque-Acevedo, Mónica & Terán-Yépez, Eduardo & Herforth-Rahmé, Joelle & Defossez, Emeline & Carlesi, Stefano & Delalieux, Stephanie & Gkisakis, Vasileios & Márton, Aliz & Molina-, 2025. "A multi-stakeholder perspective on the use of digital technologies in European organic and agroecological farming systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    8. Sarah Ruth Sippel, 2023. "Tackling land’s ‘stubborn materiality’: the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 849-863, September.
    9. Haq, Shiekh Marifatul & Khoja, Aadil Abdullah & Waheed, Muhammad & Siddiqui, Manzer H. & Alamri, Saud & Alfagham, Alanoud T. & AL-Humaid, Latifah A. & Bussmann, Rainer W., 2024. "Food ethnobotany of forest resource in the high-altitude Himalaya Mountains: Enhancing the food sovereignty of ethnic groups," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Ollendorf, Franziska & Sieber, Stefan & Löhr, Katharina, 2023. "Societal dynamics of sustainability certification in Ghanaian cocoa producing communities: Assessing social cohesion effects and their implications for collective action," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 47(2), pages 212-238.
    11. Snow, Stephen & Fielke, Simon & Fleming, Aysha & Jakku, Emma & Malakar, Yuwan & Turner, Charles & Hunter, Tammy & Tijs, Sigrid & Bonnett, Graham, 2024. "Climate services for agriculture: Steering towards inclusive innovation in Australian climate services design and delivery," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    12. Metta, Matteo & Ciliberti, Stefano & Obi, Chinedu & Bartolini, Fabio & Klerkx, Laurens & Brunori, Gianluca, 2022. "An integrated socio-cyber-physical system framework to assess responsible digitalisation in agriculture: A first application with Living Labs in Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Jinying Li & Ananda Maiti, 2025. "Applying Large Language Model Analysis and Backend Web Services in Regulatory Technologies for Continuous Compliance Checks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-34, February.
    14. John Strauser & William P. Stewart, 2024. "Moving beyond production: community narratives for good farming," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 1195-1210, September.
    15. Sukoluhle Mazwane & Moraka N. Makhura & Mmapatla P. Senyolo, 2022. "Important Policy Parameters for the Development of Inclusive Digital Agriculture: Implications for the Redistributive Land Reform Program in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Wirat Krasachat, 2023. "The Effect of Good Agricultural Practices on the Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    17. Takatoshi Ito & Kazumasa Iwata & Cassey Lee & Colin McKenzie & Shujiro Urata, 2023. "Inequality, Social Justice and Welfare in Asia: Editors' Overview," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Richard F. Doner, 2023. "Comment on “Siamese Twin Failures: Structural and Regulatory Transformations in Unequal Thailand”," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 18(1), pages 71-72, January.
    19. Passarelli, Mariacarmela & Bongiorno, Giuseppe & Cucino, Valentina & Cariola, Alfio, 2023. "Adopting new technologies during the crisis: An empirical analysis of agricultural sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    20. Ollerenshaw, Alison & Murphy, Angela & Walters, Judi & Robinson, Nathan & Thompson, Helen, 2023. "Use of digital technology for research data and information transfer within the Australian grains sector: A case study using Online Farm Trials," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5792-:d:1685963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.