Author
Listed:
- Ibrahim A. Elshaer
(Department of Management, School of Business, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsaa 31982, Saudi Arabia
King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia)
- Sameer M. AlNajdi
(King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia
Education Technology Department, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia)
- Mostafa A. Salem
(King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia
Deanship of Development and Quality Assurance, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsaa 31982, Saudi Arabia)
Abstract
This paper examines the impacts of AI-powered assistive technologies (AIATs) on the academic success of higher education university students with visual impairments. As digital learning contexts become progressively more prevalent in higher education institutions, it is critical to understand how these technologies foster the academic success of university students with blindness or low vision. Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the study conducted a quantitative research approach and collected data from 390 visually impaired students who were enrolled in different universities across Saudi Arabia (SA). Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the paper tested the influences of four UTAUT dimensions—Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), and Facilitating Conditions (FC)—on Academic Performance (AP), while also evaluating the mediating role of Behavioral Intention (BI). The results revealed a significant positive relationship between the implementation of AI-based assistive tools and students’ academic success. Particularly, BI emerged as a key mediator in these intersections. The results indicated that PE (β = 0.137, R 2 = 0.745), SI (β = 0.070, R 2 = 0.745), and BI (β = 0.792, R 2 = 0.745) significantly affected AP. In contrast, EE (β = −0.041, R 2 = 0.745) and FC (β = −0.004, R 2 = 0.745) did not have a significant effect on AP. Concerning predictors of BI, PE (β = 0.412, R 2 = 0.317), SI (β = 0.462, R 2 = 0.317), and EE (β = 0.139, R 2 = 0.317) were all positively associated with BI. However, FC had a significant negative association with BI (β = −0.194, R 2 = 0.317). Additionally, the analysis revealed that EE, SI, and PE can all indirectly enhance Academic Performance by influencing BI. The findings provide practical insights for higher education policymakers, higher education administrators, and AI designers, emphasizing the need to improve the accessibility and usability of sustainable and long-term assistive technologies to better accommodate learners with visual impairments in higher education contexts.
Suggested Citation
Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Sameer M. AlNajdi & Mostafa A. Salem, 2025.
"Sustainable AI Solutions for Empowering Visually Impaired Students: The Role of Assistive Technologies in Academic Success,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5609-:d:1681818
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5609-:d:1681818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.