IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5609-d1681818.html

Sustainable AI Solutions for Empowering Visually Impaired Students: The Role of Assistive Technologies in Academic Success

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim A. Elshaer

    (Department of Management, School of Business, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsaa 31982, Saudi Arabia
    King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sameer M. AlNajdi

    (King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia
    Education Technology Department, Faculty of Education and Arts, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mostafa A. Salem

    (King Salman Center for Disability Research, Riyadh 11614, Saudi Arabia
    Deanship of Development and Quality Assurance, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsaa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This paper examines the impacts of AI-powered assistive technologies (AIATs) on the academic success of higher education university students with visual impairments. As digital learning contexts become progressively more prevalent in higher education institutions, it is critical to understand how these technologies foster the academic success of university students with blindness or low vision. Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, the study conducted a quantitative research approach and collected data from 390 visually impaired students who were enrolled in different universities across Saudi Arabia (SA). Employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the paper tested the influences of four UTAUT dimensions—Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), and Facilitating Conditions (FC)—on Academic Performance (AP), while also evaluating the mediating role of Behavioral Intention (BI). The results revealed a significant positive relationship between the implementation of AI-based assistive tools and students’ academic success. Particularly, BI emerged as a key mediator in these intersections. The results indicated that PE (β = 0.137, R 2 = 0.745), SI (β = 0.070, R 2 = 0.745), and BI (β = 0.792, R 2 = 0.745) significantly affected AP. In contrast, EE (β = −0.041, R 2 = 0.745) and FC (β = −0.004, R 2 = 0.745) did not have a significant effect on AP. Concerning predictors of BI, PE (β = 0.412, R 2 = 0.317), SI (β = 0.462, R 2 = 0.317), and EE (β = 0.139, R 2 = 0.317) were all positively associated with BI. However, FC had a significant negative association with BI (β = −0.194, R 2 = 0.317). Additionally, the analysis revealed that EE, SI, and PE can all indirectly enhance Academic Performance by influencing BI. The findings provide practical insights for higher education policymakers, higher education administrators, and AI designers, emphasizing the need to improve the accessibility and usability of sustainable and long-term assistive technologies to better accommodate learners with visual impairments in higher education contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Sameer M. AlNajdi & Mostafa A. Salem, 2025. "Sustainable AI Solutions for Empowering Visually Impaired Students: The Role of Assistive Technologies in Academic Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5609-:d:1681818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5609/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5609/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Larry J. & Brown, Barbara K., 1994. "Method Variance in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Research: Effects on Correlations, Path Coefficients, and Hypothesis Testing," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 185-209, February.
    2. Mostafa Aboulnour Salem & Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih, 2022. "ADIDAS: An Examined Approach for Enhancing Cognitive Load and Attitudes towards Synchronous Digital Learning Amid and Post COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Mostafa Aboulnour Salem & Wafaa Hassanien Alsyed & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2022. "Before and Amid COVID-19 Pandemic, Self-Perception of Digital Skills in Saudi Arabia Higher Education: A Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Prabal Datta Barua & Jahmunah Vicnesh & Raj Gururajan & Shu Lih Oh & Elizabeth Palmer & Muhammad Mokhzaini Azizan & Nahrizul Adib Kadri & U. Rajendra Acharya, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence Enabled Personalised Assistive Tools to Enhance Education of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders—A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Camilleri, Mark Anthony, 2024. "Factors affecting performance expectancy and intentions to use ChatGPT: Using SmartPLS to advance an information technology acceptance framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Nayef Shaie Alotaibi & Awad Hajran Alshehri, 2023. "Prospers and Obstacles in Using Artificial Intelligence in Saudi Arabia Higher Education Institutions—The Potential of AI-Based Learning Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Young Mee Jung & Hyeon Jo, 2025. "Understanding Continuance Intention of Generative AI in Education: An ECM-Based Study for Sustainable Learning Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Mostafa Aboulnour Salem, 2025. "A Digital Sustainability Lens: Investigating Medical Students’ Adoption Intentions for AI-Powered NLP Tools in Learning Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Wang & Tachia Chin & Francesco Caputo & Hanfeng Liu, 2022. "How Supportive Leadership Promotes Employee Innovation under Uncertainty: Evidence from Chinese E-Commerce Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Fahdah AlShaikh & Rawan Hayan Alwadai, 2025. "A Digital Health Equity Framework for Sustainable e-Health Services in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Rania Mjahad & Ahmed Boukranaa & Abderrahim El Karfa & Kebir Sandy, 2025. "The Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Moroccan Higher Education: Benefits and Challenges From the Perception of Academics," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    4. Maresch, Daniela & Harms, Rainer & Kailer, Norbert & Wimmer-Wurm, Birgit, 2016. "The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial intention of students in science and engineering versus business studies university programs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 172-179.
    5. Heyam H. Al-Baity, 2023. "The Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Digital Finance in Saudi Arabia: A Comprehensive Review and Proposed Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Xiu Jin & Chenglin Qing & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Ethical Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Mediating Role of Voice Behavior and Moderated Mediation Role of Psychological Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Fuller, Christie M. & Simmering, Marcia J. & Atinc, Guclu & Atinc, Yasemin & Babin, Barry J., 2016. "Common methods variance detection in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3192-3198.
    8. Qing Su & Qizhi Wei & Jinhua Xiao & Jun Yan & Cong Cao, 2025. "What Drives Older Adults to Embrace Smart Courier Lockers? A Study on Technology Acceptance and Information Literacy," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    9. Antonio Pérez-Portabella & Mario Arias-Oliva & Graciela Padilla-Castillo & Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, 2025. "Correlational and Configurational Perspectives on the Determinants of Generative AI Adoption Among Spanish Zoomers and Millennials," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Wadim Strielkowski & Veronika Grebennikova & Alexander Lisovskiy & Guzalbegim Rakhimova & Tatiana Vasileva, 2025. "AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 1921-1947, April.
    11. Suela Bylykbashi & Gilles Roehrich & Khalil Assala, 2021. "How To Measure Competitive Intensity?," Post-Print hal-03381232, HAL.
    12. Yamao, Sachiko & Sekiguchi, Tomoki, 2015. "Employee commitment to corporate globalization: The role of English language proficiency and human resource practices," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 168-179.
    13. Vaclav Moravec & Beata Gavurova & Nik Hynek & Martin Rigelsky, 2025. "Human-machine in the vortex of digital synergy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Kalisz, David E., 2025. "Drivers of artificial intelligence integrated healthcare applications. Patients' perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    16. Lassaad Abdelmoula, 2021. "Effect of the Association of Gender and Specialization on the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Performance in the Tax Field: Tunisian Context," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 362-372.
    17. Chang-ming Hsieh, 2018. "Importance Weighting in Client Satisfaction Measures: Lessons from the Life Satisfaction Literature," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 45-60, July.
    18. Wendy Hui, 2010. "Self-generated Validity, Framing Effects, and Survey Research in IS," ICBBR Working Papers 11, International Centre for Behavioural Business Research.
    19. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:3262-3271 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Dang, Simon & Quach, Sara & Roberts, Robin E., 2025. "How time fuels AI device adoption: A contextual model enriched by machine learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    21. Diana Puspita Sari & Nur Aini Masruroh & Anna Maria Sri Asih, 2021. "Consumer Intention to Participate in E-Waste Collection Programs: A Study of Smartphone Waste in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5609-:d:1681818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.