IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5577-d1681081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life-Cycle Cost Assessment in Real Estate Decision-Making Processes: Scope, Limits and Shortages of Current Practices—An Integrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Salvador Domínguez Gil

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Gema Ramírez Pacheco

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Silvia Alonso de los Ríos

    (Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Life-cycle cost assessment has gained increasing relevance across sectors related to urban and building development. In real estate and public procurement decision-making, it offers a comprehensive view of property costs beyond the initial investment, which aligns with European Sustainable Development policies and new taxonomies in sustainable investment. Life-cycle cost assessment supports sustainable design decisions by integrating multiple perspectives and methodologies, including Whole Life Costing and Net Present Value calculations. This approach enables a comprehensive evaluation of long-term costs and benefits, assessing their impact on economic viability and profitability throughout the investment life cycle. However, several challenges persist in standardizing methodologies, developing comprehensive data inventories, and ensuring consistency in result interpretation. The absence of universally accepted frameworks and guidelines introduces additional limitations for practitioners, including estimation inaccuracies, biased assessments, unreliable probability judgments, and the neglect of indirect consequences in decision-making. This review particularly emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary research to advance the integration of costs and benefits of externalities and intangibles associated with social and environmental criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvador Domínguez Gil & Gema Ramírez Pacheco & Silvia Alonso de los Ríos, 2025. "Life-Cycle Cost Assessment in Real Estate Decision-Making Processes: Scope, Limits and Shortages of Current Practices—An Integrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5577-:d:1681081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Zéghal & Anis Maaloul, 2011. "The accounting treatment of intangibles – A critical review of the literature," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 262-274, December.
    2. Rennings, Klaus & Wiggering, Hubert, 1997. "Steps towards indicators of sustainable development: Linking economic and ecological concepts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 25-36, January.
    3. Marianna Lena Kambanou, 2020. "Life Cycle Costing: Understanding How It Is Practised and Its Relationship to Life Cycle Management—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Sabrina Neugebauer & Silvia Forin & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2016. "From Life Cycle Costing to Economic Life Cycle Assessment—Introducing an Economic Impact Pathway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Zéghal, Daniel & Maaloul, Anis, 2011. "The accounting treatment of intangibles – A critical review of the literature," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 262-274.
    6. Milad Mousazadeh & Biswaranjan Paital & Zohreh Naghdali & Zohreh Mortezania & Marjan Hashemi & Elnaz Karamati Niaragh & Mohammad Aghababaei & Melika Ghorbankhani & Eric Lichtfouse & Mika Sillanpää & K, 2021. "Positive environmental effects of the coronavirus 2020 episode: a review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 12738-12760, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2019. "Does Equity Market Differently Perceive IC Management and Disclosure Behaviours?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 756-775, June.
    2. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D?Amico & Sabato Vinci, 2019. "The effectiveness of intellectual capital disclosure in market assessments of corporate value creation," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(1), pages 5-35.
    3. Christian Nielsen & Gunnar Rimmel & Tadanori Yosano, 2015. "Outperforming markets: IC and the long-term performance of Japanese IPOs," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 83-96, June.
    4. Yuri Biondi & Antoine Rebérioux, 2012. "The governance of intangibles: Rethinking financial reporting and the board of directors," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 279-293, December.
    5. Stephen Penman, 2021. "Accounting for Risk," Foundations and Trends(R) in Accounting, now publishers, vol. 15(4), pages 373-507, November.
    6. Milenović Jovana & Bonić Ljiljana & Krstić Bojan, 2024. "Impact of Intellectual Capital Efficiency on Profitability: The Case of Information Technology Companies on the NYSE," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 62(3), pages 389-412.
    7. Marques, Mário & Pinho, Carlos & Montenegro, Tânia Menezes, 2019. "The effect of international income shifting on the link between real investment and corporate taxation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Vance, C. & Sweeney, J. & Murphy, F., 2022. "Space, time, and sustainability: The status and future of life cycle assessment frameworks for novel biorefinery systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Dyhdalewicz Anna & Widelska Urszula, 2017. "Accouting and marketing dimensions of innovations," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Li, Qing & Wu, Yanrui, 2020. "Intangible capital, ICT and sector growth in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1).
    11. Coluccia, Daniela & Dabić, Marina & Del Giudice, Manlio & Fontana, Stefano & Solimene, Silvia, 2020. "R&D innovation indicator and its effects on the market. An empirical assessment from a financial perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 259-271.
    12. Ancuta Alina Gheorghe & Moisescu Florentina, 2017. "Study Regarding The Financial Reporting Of Intangible Assets. Case Of Romanian Pharmaceutical Industry," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 35(1), pages 163-172.
    13. Rigby, Dan & Woodhouse, Phil & Young, Trevor & Burton, Michael, 2001. "Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 463-478, December.
    14. Simone Blanc & Stefano Massaglia & Filippo Brun & Cristiana Peano & Angela Mosso & Nicole Roberta Giuggioli, 2019. "Use of Bio-Based Plastics in the Fruit Supply Chain: An Integrated Approach to Assess Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Diana Tuomasjukka & Staffan Berg & Marcus Lindner, 2013. "Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32, December.
    16. Baudry, Gino & Delrue, Florian & Legrand, Jack & Pruvost, Jérémy & Vallée, Thomas, 2017. "The challenge of measuring biofuel sustainability: A stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 933-947.
    17. Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2025. "Life Cycle-Based Product Sustainability Assessment Employing Quality and Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    18. Abeysekera, Indra, 2016. "Does the classification of intangibles matter? An equivalence testing," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 135-142.
    19. Silvio Franco & Barbara Pancino & Angelo Martella, 2021. "Mapping National Environmental Sustainability Distribution by Ecological Footprint: The Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Zbigniew Leszczyński & Tomasz Jasiński, 2020. "Comparison of Product Life Cycle Cost Estimating Models Based on Neural Networks and Parametric Techniques—A Case Study for Induction Motors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5577-:d:1681081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.