IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5516-d1679629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Agrivoltaic Farming: The Role of Mycorrhiza in Promoting Mint Cultivation and High-Quality Essential Oil Production

Author

Listed:
  • Bihter Çolak Esetlili

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir 35100, Türkiye)

  • M. Tolga Esetlili

    (Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir 35100, Türkiye)

  • Kaan Emir

    (Enerjisa Enerji Üretim A.Ş., Barbaros Mah, Lale Sok., Ataşehir, İstanbul 34746, Türkiye)

  • Murat Eröz

    (Enerjisa Enerji Üretim A.Ş., Barbaros Mah, Lale Sok., Ataşehir, İstanbul 34746, Türkiye)

Abstract

Agriphotovoltaic (Agri-PV) systems are a dual-purpose solution for resolving land utilization conflicts through combining agricultural practices and photovoltaic power generation. However, the reduced light intensities and altered microclimatic conditions under PV modules may have negative effects on the productivity of crops. This study investigated whether incorporating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation into Agri-PV systems could mitigate such limitations for mint cultivation ( Mentha arvensis and Mentha × piperita ). A field trial was conducted in Bandırma, Türkiye, where both mint species were grown under and between PV panels, with and without AMF. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), temperature, fresh biomass, nutrient uptake, and essential oil content were evaluated. PAR was reduced by more than 90% under panels, while air temperatures were 1.0–1.6 °C lower than those in the between-panel areas. AMF inoculation significantly improved the yield and quality. In Mentha arvensis , the fresh herb yield increased by 43.4% (from 10,620 to 15,230 kg ha −1 ), and the essential oil content reached 10.08% under between-panel mycorrhizal conditions. For Mentha × piperita , the highest menthol concentration (30.38%) was observed exclusively in between-panel plots with AMF. In contrast, the highest oil content (4.50%) was achieved under shaded, mycorrhizal conditions, indicating that both light exposure and microbial interactions shape biochemical responses. This is the first study to demonstrate the synergistic impact of AMF inoculation and agrivoltaic shading on essential oil crops. This paper presents a novel and sustainable model that enhances crop productivity and biochemical quality in solar-integrated agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Bihter Çolak Esetlili & M. Tolga Esetlili & Kaan Emir & Murat Eröz, 2025. "Sustainable Agrivoltaic Farming: The Role of Mycorrhiza in Promoting Mint Cultivation and High-Quality Essential Oil Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5516-:d:1679629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valle, B. & Simonneau, T. & Sourd, F. & Pechier, P. & Hamard, P. & Frisson, T. & Ryckewaert, M. & Christophe, A., 2017. "Increasing the total productivity of a land by combining mobile photovoltaic panels and food crops," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1495-1507.
    2. Walston, Leroy J. & Li, Yudi & Hartmann, Heidi M. & Macknick, Jordan & Hanson, Aaron & Nootenboom, Chris & Lonsdorf, Eric & Hellmann, Jessica, 2021. "Modeling the ecosystem services of native vegetation management practices at solar energy facilities in the Midwestern United States," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    3. Grazia Disciglio & Laura Frabboni & Annalisa Tarantino & Antonio Stasi, 2023. "Association between Dynamic Agrivoltaic System and Cultivation: Viability, Yields and Qualitative Assessment of Medical Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Cui Li & Jinxian Liu & Jiabing Bao & Tiehang Wu & Baofeng Chai, 2023. "Effect of Light Heterogeneity Caused by Photovoltaic Panels on the Plant–Soil–Microbial System in Solar Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Carmine De Francesco & Luana Centorame & Giuseppe Toscano & Daniele Duca, 2025. "Opportunities, Technological Challenges and Monitoring Approaches in Agrivoltaic Systems for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Jamil, Furqan & Ali, Hafiz Muhammad & Nasir, Muhammad Ali & Karahan, Mehmet & Janjua, M.M. & Naseer, Ammar & Ejaz, Ali & Pasha, Riffat Asim, 2021. "Evaluation of photovoltaic panels using different nano phase change material and a concise comparison: An experimental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1265-1279.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krexner, T. & Bauer, A. & Gronauer, A. & Mikovits, C. & Schmidt, J. & Kral, I., 2024. "Environmental life cycle assessment of a stilted and vertical bifacial crop-based agrivoltaic multi land-use system and comparison with a mono land-use of agricultural land," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Sahoo, Somadutta & Zuidema, Christian & van Stralen, Joost N.P. & Sijm, Jos & Faaij, André, 2022. "Detailed spatial analysis of renewables’ potential and heat: A study of Groningen Province in the northern Netherlands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    3. Schindele, Stephan & Trommsdorff, Maximilian & Schlaak, Albert & Obergfell, Tabea & Bopp, Georg & Reise, Christian & Braun, Christian & Weselek, Axel & Bauerle, Andrea & Högy, Petra & Goetzberger, Ado, 2020. "Implementation of agrophotovoltaics: Techno-economic analysis of the price-performance ratio and its policy implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Ayadi, Osama & Al-Bakri, Jawad T. & Abdalla, Mohammed E.B. & Aburumman, Qasim, 2024. "The potential of agrivoltaic systems in Jordan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    5. Amaducci, Stefano & Yin, Xinyou & Colauzzi, Michele, 2018. "Agrivoltaic systems to optimise land use for electric energy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 545-561.
    6. He, Zemin & Yu, Ping & Niu, Lichun & Zhang, Cuihong & Ma, Cheng, 2024. "Photovoltaic panel cooling with new composite of phase change materials and hierarchical nanoparticles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    7. Gonocruz, Ruth Anne Tanlioco & Yoshida, Yoshikuni & Ozawa, Akito & Aguirre, Rodolfo A. & Maguindayao, Edward Joseph H., 2023. "Impacts of agrivoltaics in rural electrification and decarbonization in the Philippines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    8. Poonia, Surendra & Jat, N.K. & Santra, Priyabrata & Singh, A.K. & Jain, Dilip & Meena, H.M., 2022. "Techno-economic evaluation of different agri-voltaic designs for the hot arid ecosystem India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 149-163.
    9. Li, Xinyi & Cui, Wei & Simon, Terrence & Ma, Ting & Cui, Tianhong & Wang, Qiuwang, 2021. "Pore-scale analysis on selection of composite phase change materials for photovoltaic thermal management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    10. Elamri, Y. & Cheviron, B. & Lopez, J.-M. & Dejean, C. & Belaud, G., 2018. "Water budget and crop modelling for agrivoltaic systems: Application to irrigated lettuces," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 440-453.
    11. Joshua M. Pearce, 2022. "Agrivoltaics in Ontario Canada: Promise and Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Gasch, Adam & Lara, Rafael & Pearce, Joshua M., 2025. "Financial analysis of agrivoltaic sheep: Breeding and auction lamb business models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    13. Widmer, J. & Christ, B. & Grenz, J. & Norgrove, L., 2024. "Agrivoltaics, a promising new tool for electricity and food production: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Grubbs, E.K. & Gruss, S.M. & Schull, V.Z. & Gosney, M.J. & Mickelbart, M.V. & Brouder, S. & Gitau, M.W. & Bermel, P. & Tuinstra, M.R. & Agrawal, R., 2024. "Optimized agrivoltaic tracking for nearly-full commodity crop and energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Casares de la Torre, F.J. & Varo, Marta & López-Luque, R. & Ramírez-Faz, J. & Fernández-Ahumada, L.M., 2022. "Design and analysis of a tracking / backtracking strategy for PV plants with horizontal trackers after their conversion to agrivoltaic plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 537-550.
    16. Agostini, A. & Colauzzi, M. & Amaducci, S., 2021. "Innovative agrivoltaic systems to produce sustainable energy: An economic and environmental assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    17. Daisuke Yajima & Teruya Toyoda & Masaaki Kirimura & Kenji Araki & Yasuyuki Ota & Kensuke Nishioka, 2023. "Estimation Model of Agrivoltaic Systems Maximizing for Both Photovoltaic Electricity Generation and Agricultural Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Cossu, Marco & Cossu, Andrea & Deligios, Paola A. & Ledda, Luigi & Li, Zhi & Fatnassi, Hicham & Poncet, Christine & Yano, Akira, 2018. "Assessment and comparison of the solar radiation distribution inside the main commercial photovoltaic greenhouse types in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 822-834.
    19. Christian Dupraz & Kevin J. Wolz & Isabelle Lecomte & Grégoire Talbot & Grégoire Vincent & Rachmat Mulia & François Bussière & Harry Ozier-Lafontaine & Sitraka Andrianarisoa & Nick Jackson & Gerry Law, 2019. "Hi-sAFe: A 3D Agroforestry Model for Integrating Dynamic Tree–Crop Interactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Grazia Disciglio & Laura Frabboni & Annalisa Tarantino & Antonio Stasi, 2023. "Association between Dynamic Agrivoltaic System and Cultivation: Viability, Yields and Qualitative Assessment of Medical Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5516-:d:1679629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.