Author
Listed:
- Elias Blanckaert
(imec-SMIT, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium)
- Louise Hallström
(imec-SMIT, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium)
- Iris Jennes
(imec-SMIT, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium)
- Wendy Van den Broeck
(imec-SMIT, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium)
Abstract
The living lab methodology is widely used in innovation projects to drive user-centered development. While its benefits, such as co-creation and real-world validation, are well known, its implementation presents challenges that remain underexplored. This study examines these challenges by using the Horizon 2020 Möbius project as a case study. While the Möbius project itself aimed to modernize European book publishing through an immersive reading application and a data visualization tool, this study reflects on the implementation process of the living lab approach within that context, using an action research approach. After project completion, a structured brainstorming session reviewed identified challenges and mitigation strategies. Findings highlight three key challenges. First, misalignment between assumed and actual stakeholder needs hindered industry engagement. Second, recruitment was complicated by the ambiguous use of “prosumer”, causing confusion among participants. Third, communication gaps and personnel changes disrupted the integration of user feedback into development cycles. These challenges underscore the need for early and continuous stakeholder alignment, adaptive communication, and structured knowledge management. Based on these findings, the study proposes strategies to improve engagement and integrate user insights more effectively, ultimately enhancing the impact of living lab-based innovation projects.
Suggested Citation
Elias Blanckaert & Louise Hallström & Iris Jennes & Wendy Van den Broeck, 2025.
"What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Exploring Challenges and Mitigation Strategies of Applying a Living Lab Approach in an Innovation Project,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5496-:d:1679002
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5496-:d:1679002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.