IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5183-d1672131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decoupling China’s Tourism Economy from Carbon Emissions Through Digitalization: A Supply-Side Analytical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangmei Luo

    (College of Management, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Xinyi Yin

    (College of Management, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Yangganxuan Li

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Xiaoyong Zhou

    (College of Management, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

Global tourism activities have become increasingly digitalized, yet the economic and environmental impacts of digitalization on tourism remain underexplored. This study develops a supply-side analytical framework to examine whether and how digitalization decouples tourism economy from carbon emissions by integrating Ghosh input-output analysis, subsystem analysis, and structural decomposition analysis. Our findings reveal that digitalization has largely decoupled China’s tourism economy from carbon emissions, with the increases in economic gains notably outpacing those in emission losses. Specifically, the digital-enabled tourism value-added (DTV) increased by approximately 18 times from 2002 to 2017, while digital-enabled tourism emissions (DTE) only grew by about 11 times. Between 2017 and 2020, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the DTV decreased by about 61%, and DTE dropped by approximately 63.5%. The expansion in DTV can be primarily attributed to advancements in software and IT services and electronic components, while the increase in DTE is significantly driven by software and IT services and communication services. The growth in digital supply emerged as the predominant driver for the surging DTV and DTE, with the emission intensity of tourism subsectors acting as a notable constraint. This study offers both a methodological framework and empirical evidence aimed at guiding policy initiatives that target the digitalization and low-carbon transition of the tourism sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangmei Luo & Xinyi Yin & Yangganxuan Li & Xiaoyong Zhou, 2025. "Decoupling China’s Tourism Economy from Carbon Emissions Through Digitalization: A Supply-Side Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5183-:d:1672131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ya-Nan Zhao & Chien-Chiang Lee, 2024. "How does industrial relocation affect carbon emissions? Evidence from Chinese cities," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 1-33, December.
    2. Rui Tang, 2024. "Digital economy and total factor productivity of tourism enterprises in China: the perspective of market competition theory," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 76-91, January.
    3. Wei, Yi & Liu, Qing, 2023. "How does the travel and tourism industry contribute to sustainable resource management? The moderating role of ICT in highly resource-consuming countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 1998. "Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 307-324.
    5. Su, Bin & Ang, B.W. & Li, Yingzhu, 2019. "Structural path and decomposition analysis of aggregate embodied energy and emission intensities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 345-360.
    6. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    7. Su, Bin & Ang, B.W., 2012. "Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Some methodological developments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 177-188.
    8. Zhou, Xiaoyong & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Qunwei, 2018. "How does information and communication technology affect China's energy intensity? A three-tier structural decomposition analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 748-759.
    9. Zhou, Xiaoyong & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Qunwei & Su, Bin, 2019. "How information and communication technology drives carbon emissions: A sector-level analysis for China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 380-392.
    10. Manfred Lenzen & Ya-Yen Sun & Futu Faturay & Yuan-Peng Ting & Arne Geschke & Arunima Malik, 2018. "The carbon footprint of global tourism," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(6), pages 522-528, June.
    11. Yan, Junna & Su, Bin, 2020. "What drive the changes in China's energy consumption and intensity during 12th Five-Year Plan period?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Moreno-Izquierdo, L. & Ramón-Rodríguez, A. & Perles Ribes, J., 2015. "The impact of the internet on the pricing strategies of the European low cost airlines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 651-660.
    13. Manfred Lenzen & Ya-Yen Sun & Futu Faturay & Yuan-Peng Ting & Arne Geschke & Arunima Malik, 2018. "Author Correction: The carbon footprint of global tourism," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(6), pages 544-544, June.
    14. Haitao Wu & Ruohan Zhong & Pinrui Guo & Yunxia Guo & Yu Hao, 2024. "The role of the digital economy in tourism: mechanism, causality and geospatial spillover," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(6), pages 2355-2395, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xiaomei & Su, Bin & Yang, Jun & Cong, Jianhui, 2022. "Analysis of Shanxi Province's energy consumption and intensity using input-output framework (2002–2017)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    2. Sun, Ya-Fang & Yu, Shiwei & Zhang, Yue-Jun & Su, Bin, 2023. "How do imports change the energy consumption of China? An analysis of its role in intermediate inputs and final demands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Yan, Junna & Li, Yingzhu & Su, Bin & Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2022. "Contributors and drivers of Chinese energy use and intensity from regional and demand perspectives, 2012-2015-2017," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Zhang, Chuanguo & Yu, Xiaoxue & Zhou, Juncen, 2024. "China's embodied oil outflow in GVC participation: Patterns and drivers," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Yi Lin & Xin Qi & Lijuan Wang, 2024. "Digital Transformation and Carbon Intensity: Evidence from Chinese Tourism Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Yan, Junna & Su, Bin, 2020. "What drive the changes in China's energy consumption and intensity during 12th Five-Year Plan period?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Wang, Jianda & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "How digital industries affect China's carbon emissions? Analysis of the direct and indirect structural effects," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Ma, Jianhong & Wang, Ning & Chen, Zihao & Wang, Libo & Xiong, Qiyang & Chen, Peilin & Zhang, Hongxia & Zheng, Ying & Chen, Zhan-Ming, 2024. "Accounting and decomposition of China's CO2 emissions 1981–2021," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    9. Zhang, Chi & Su, Bin & Zhou, Kaile & Sun, Yuan, 2020. "A multi-dimensional analysis on microeconomic factors of China's industrial energy intensity (2000–2017)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Zhang, Danyang & Wang, Hui & Löschel, Andreas & Zhou, Peng, 2021. "The changing role of global value chains in CO2 emission intensity in 2000–2014," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Zhu, Bangzhu & Su, Bin & Li, Yingzhu & Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2020. "Embodied energy and intensity in China’s (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2005-2015," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Tian, Kailan & Dietzenbacher, Erik & Yan, Bingqian & Duan, Yuwan, 2020. "Upgrading or downgrading: China's regional carbon emission intensity evolution and its determinants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Nan, 2021. "Decomposition of energy intensity in Chinese industries using an extended LMDI method of production element endowment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Su, Bin & Ang, B.W., 2020. "Demand contributors and driving factors of Singapore’s aggregate carbon intensities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Wang, Zhenguo & Su, Bin & Xie, Rui & Long, Haiyu, 2020. "China’s aggregate embodied CO2 emission intensity from 2007 to 2012: A multi-region multiplicative structural decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Xu, Duo & Liu, Gengyuan & Meng, Fanxin & Yan, Ningyu & Li, Hui & Agostinho, Feni & Almeida, Cecilia MVB & Giannetti, Biagio F, 2023. "Sector aggregation effect on embodied carbon emission based on city-centric global multi-region input-output (CCG-MRIO) model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    17. Duan, Yuwan & Yan, Bingqian, 2021. "Has processing trade made China's exports cleaner? A regional level analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Zhou, Xiaoyong & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Qunwei & Su, Bin, 2019. "How information and communication technology drives carbon emissions: A sector-level analysis for China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 380-392.
    19. Qiuping Li & Sanmang Wu & Qingshi Tu, 2024. "Delineating the embodied CO2 emissions in Canada's exports: Routes, drivers, and paths," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(4), pages 901-915, August.
    20. Niu, Meng & Wang, Zhenguo & Zhang, Yabin, 2022. "How information and communication technology drives (routine and non-routine) jobs: Structural path and decomposition analysis for China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5183-:d:1672131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.