IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5023-d1668377.html

Leveraging Potato Chip Industry Residues: Bioenergy Production and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Patrícia V. Almeida

    (Chemical Engineering and Renewable Resources for Sustainability (CERES), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Luís M. Castro

    (Chemical Engineering and Renewable Resources for Sustainability (CERES), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal
    Research Center for Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Bencanta, 3045-601 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Anna Klepacz-Smółka

    (Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Wolczanska 213, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Licínio M. Gando-Ferreira

    (Chemical Engineering and Renewable Resources for Sustainability (CERES), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Margarida J. Quina

    (Chemical Engineering and Renewable Resources for Sustainability (CERES), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) offers a sustainable solution by treating biodegradable waste while recovering bioenergy, enhancing the share of renewable energy. Thus, this study aims to investigate the AD for managing and valorizing residues from the potato chip industry: potato peel (PP), potato offcuts (OC), waste cooking oil (WCO), wastewater (WW), and sewage sludge (SS). In particular, the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of each residue, anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of an AD plant are assessed. WW, OC, and SS present a BMP of around 232–280 NmL CH4 /kg of volatile solids (VS). PP and WCO reach a BMP slightly lower than the former substrates (174–202 NmL CH4 /g VS ). AcoD results in methane yields between 150 and 250 NmL CH4 /g VS . An up-scaled anaerobic digester is designed to manage 1.60 Mg/d of PP. A residence time of 12 days and a digester with 165 m 3 is estimated, yielding 14 Nm 3 CH4 /Mg VS /d. A simulated AD plant integrated with a combined heat and power unit results in a carbon footprint of 542 kg of CO 2 -eq/Mg db PP, primarily from biogenic GHG emissions. These findings highlight the potential of AD to generate renewable energy from potato industry residues while reducing fossil fuel-related GHG emissions and promoting resource circularity.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrícia V. Almeida & Luís M. Castro & Anna Klepacz-Smółka & Licínio M. Gando-Ferreira & Margarida J. Quina, 2025. "Leveraging Potato Chip Industry Residues: Bioenergy Production and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5023-:d:1668377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spyridon Achinas & Yu Li & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "Biogas Potential from the Anaerobic Digestion of Potato Peels: Process Performance and Kinetics Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Yu, Xinhui & Yan, Lei & Wang, Haipeng & Bi, Shaojie & Zhang, Futao & Huang, Sisi & Wang, Yanhong & Wang, Yanjie, 2024. "Anaerobic co-digestion of cabbage waste and cattle manure: Effect of mixing ratio and hydraulic retention time," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Alun Scott & Richard Blanchard, 2021. "The Role of Anaerobic Digestion in Reducing Dairy Farm Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Moraes, Bruna S. & Petersen, Søren O. & Zaiat, Marcelo & Sommer, Sven G. & Triolo, Jin Mi, 2017. "Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from vinasse through anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 21-30.
    5. Parawira, W & Murto, M & Zvauya, R & Mattiasson, B, 2004. "Anaerobic batch digestion of solid potato waste alone and in combination with sugar beet leaves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1811-1823.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katinas, Vladislovas & Marčiukaitis, Mantas & Perednis, Eugenijus & Dzenajavičienė, Eugenija Farida, 2019. "Analysis of biodegradable waste use for energy generation in Lithuania," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 559-567.
    2. Garcia, Natalia Herrero & Mattioli, Andrea & Gil, Aida & Frison, Nicola & Battista, Federico & Bolzonella, David, 2019. "Evaluation of the methane potential of different agricultural and food processing substrates for improved biogas production in rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-10.
    3. P. Elaiyaraju & N. Partha, 2016. "Studies on biogas production by anaerobic process using agroindustrial wastes," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(2), pages 73-82.
    4. Gabriel S. Aruwajoye & Alaika Kassim & Akshay K. Saha & Evariste B. Gueguim Kana, 2020. "Prospects for the Improvement of Bioethanol and Biohydrogen Production from Mixed Starch-Based Agricultural Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Solli, Linn & Schnürer, Anna & Horn, Svein J., 2018. "Process performance and population dynamics of ammonium tolerant microorganisms during co-digestion of fish waste and manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 529-536.
    6. Spyridon Achinas & Yu Li & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "Biogas Potential from the Anaerobic Digestion of Potato Peels: Process Performance and Kinetics Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Maghanaki, M. Mohammadi & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G. & Galogah, R. Janzadeh, 2013. "Potential of biogas production in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 702-714.
    8. Sanjeev Kumar Soni & Binny Sharma & Apurav Sharma & Bishakha Thakur & Raman Soni, 2023. "Exploring the Potential of Potato Peels for Bioethanol Production through Various Pretreatment Strategies and an In-House-Produced Multi-Enzyme System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Bo Zhang & Wenzhe Li & Xiang Xu & Pengfei Li & Nan Li & Hongqiong Zhang & Yong Sun, 2019. "Effect of Aerobic Hydrolysis on Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Various Parts of Corn Stover and the Scum Layer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Parawira, W. & Murto, M. & Zvauya, R. & Mattiasson, B., 2006. "Comparative performance of a UASB reactor and an anaerobic packed-bed reactor when treating potato waste leachate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 893-903.
    11. Ekwenna, Emeka Boniface & Wang, Yaodong & Roskilly, Anthony, 2023. "Bioenergy production from pretreated rice straw in Nigeria: An analysis of novel three-stage anaerobic digestion for hydrogen and methane co-generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    12. Jiří Souček & Algirdas Jasinskas, 2020. "Assessment of the Use of Potatoes as a Binder in Flax Heating Pellets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lin, Shih-Cheng, 2018. "Biogas partial oxidation in a heat recirculation reactor for syngas production and CO2 utilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 113-125.
    14. Ali Dabestani-Rahmatabad & Gabriel Capson-Tojo & Eric Trably & Jean-Philippe Delgenès & Renaud Escudié, 2024. "Assessing the Impact of Organic Loading Rate on Hydrogen Consumption Rates during In Situ Biomethanation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Bi, Shaojie & Wang, Chunshuang & Wang, Haipeng & Du, Yanli & Yu, Xinhui & Wang, Yanjie, 2024. "Comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: Focusing on methanogenic performance and pathogens removal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Anelisa de Aquino Vidal Lacerda Soares & Renato de Mello Prado & Rosemary Marques de Almeida Bertani & Ana Paula Rodrigues da Silva & Angélica Cristina Fernandes Deus & Cristiaini Kano & Fernanda de P, 2024. "Contribution of Using Filter Cake and Vinasse as a Source of Nutrients for Sustainable Agriculture—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Owamah, H.I. & Alfa, M.I. & Dahunsi, S.O., 2014. "Optimization of biogas from chicken droppings with Cymbopogon citratus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 366-371.
    19. Santo Fabio Corsino & Michele Torregrossa & Gaspare Viviani, 2021. "Biomethane Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Selected Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) with Sewage Sludge: Effect of the Inoculum to Substrate Ratio (ISR) and Mixture Composition on Process Performances," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Duan, Yumin & Wang, Zhi & Ganeshan, Prabakaran & Sar, Taner & Xu, Suyun & Rajendran, Karthik & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang & Taherzadeh, Mohammad J. & A, 2025. "Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production for sustainable bioeconomy: Potential and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5023-:d:1668377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.