IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4948-d1666267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Business Failure with the XGBoost Algorithm: The Role of Environmental Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Mariano Romero Martínez

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Tarongers Campus, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Pedro Carmona Ibáñez

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Tarongers Campus, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Julián Martínez Vargas

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Tarongers Campus, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

This study addresses the increasing emphasis on sustainability and the importance of understanding how environmental risk influences business failure, a factor unexplored in traditional financial prediction models. Environmental risk, or environmental financial exposure, refers to the potential percentage of a company’s revenue at risk due to the environmental damage it causes. Previous research has not sufficiently integrated environmental variables into failure prediction models. This study aims to determine whether environmental risk significantly predicts business failure and how it interacts with conventional financial indicators. Utilizing data from 971 Spanish cooperative companies in 2022, including financial ratios, the VADIS bankruptcy propensity indicator, and the TRUCAM environmental risk score, the study employs the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning algorithm, chosen for its robustness in handling multicollinearity and nonlinear relationships. The methodology involves training and validation samples, cross-validation for hyperparameter tuning, and interpretability techniques such as variable importance analysis and partial dependence plots. Results demonstrate that the variable related to environmental risk (TRUCAM) ranks among the top predictors, alongside liquidity, profitability, and labor costs, with higher TRUCAM values correlating positively with failure risk, underscoring the importance of sustainable cost management. These findings suggest that firms facing substantial environmental risk are more prone to financial distress. By incorporating this environmental variable into a machine learning framework, this work contributes to the interaction between sustainability practices and corporate viability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariano Romero Martínez & Pedro Carmona Ibáñez & Julián Martínez Vargas, 2025. "Predicting Business Failure with the XGBoost Algorithm: The Role of Environmental Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4948-:d:1666267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4948/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4948/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nooraslinda Abdul Aris & Marziana Madah Marzuki & Rohana Othman & Safawi Abdul Rahman & Norashikin Hj Ismail, 2018. "Designing indicators for cooperative sustainability: the Malaysian perspective," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 226-248, March.
    2. Edward I. Altman, 1968. "Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis And The Prediction Of Corporate Bankruptcy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 589-609, September.
    3. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    4. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    5. Mozas-Moral, Adoración & Fernández-Uclés, Domingo & Medina-Viruel, Miguel Jesús & Bernal-Jurado, Enrique, 2021. "The role of the SDGs as enhancers of the performance of Spanish wine cooperatives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Ohlson, Ja, 1980. "Financial Ratios And The Probabilistic Prediction Of Bankruptcy," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 109-131.
    7. Zmijewski, Me, 1984. "Methodological Issues Related To The Estimation Of Financial Distress Prediction Models," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22, pages 59-82.
    8. Jones, Stewart & Johnstone, David & Wilson, Roy, 2015. "An empirical evaluation of the performance of binary classifiers in the prediction of credit ratings changes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 72-85.
    9. Frydman, Halina & Altman, Edward I & Kao, Duen-Li, 1985. "Introducing Recursive Partitioning for Financial Classification: The Case of Financial Distress," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 40(1), pages 269-291, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Şaban Çelik & Bora Aktan & Bruce Burton, 2022. "Firm dynamics and bankruptcy processes: A new theoretical model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 567-591, April.
    2. Zeineb Affes & Rania Hentati-Kaffel, 2016. "Forecast bankruptcy using a blend of clustering and MARS model - Case of US banks," Post-Print halshs-01314553, HAL.
    3. Pablo de Llano Monelos & Manuel Rodríguez López & Carlos Piñeiro Sánchez, 2013. "Bankruptcy Prediction Models in Galician companies. Application of Parametric Methodologies and Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 117-136.
    4. Casado Yusta, Silvia & Nœ–ez Letamendía, Laura & Pacheco Bonrostro, Joaqu’n Antonio, 2018. "Predicting Corporate Failure: The GRASP-LOGIT Model || Predicci—n de la quiebra empresarial: el modelo GRASP-LOGIT," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 26(1), pages 294-314, Diciembre.
    5. Ruey-Ching Hwang & K. F. Cheng & Jack C. Lee, 2007. "A semiparametric method for predicting bankruptcy," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 317-342.
    6. Aggarwal, Nidhi & Singh, Manish K. & Thomas, Susan, 2023. "Do decreases in Distance-to-Default predict rating downgrades?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Mohammad Mahdi Mousavi & Jamal Ouenniche & Kaoru Tone, 2023. "A dynamic performance evaluation of distress prediction models," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 756-784, July.
    8. du Jardin, Philippe, 2015. "Bankruptcy prediction using terminal failure processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 286-303.
    9. Esteban Alfaro Cortés & Matías Gámez Martínez & Noelia García Rubio, 2007. "Multiclass Corporate Failure Prediction by Adaboost.M1," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 13(3), pages 301-312, August.
    10. Sumaira Ashraf & Elisabete G. S. Félix & Zélia Serrasqueiro, 2019. "Do Traditional Financial Distress Prediction Models Predict the Early Warning Signs of Financial Distress?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, April.
    11. du Jardin, Philippe, 2012. "The influence of variable selection methods on the accuracy of bankruptcy prediction models," MPRA Paper 44383, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Virág, Miklós & Kristóf, Tamás, 2005. "Az első hazai csődmodell újraszámítása neurális hálók segítségével [Recalculation of the first Hungarian bankruptcy-prediction model using neural networks]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 144-162.
    13. Fernando García & Francisco Guijarro & Ismael Moya, 2013. "Monitoring credit risk in the social economy sector by means of a binary goal programming model," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(3), pages 483-495, September.
    14. John W. Pacey & Toan M. Pham, 1990. "The Predictiveness of Bankruptcy Models: Methodological Problems and Evidence," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 15(2), pages 315-337, December.
    15. Moro, Russ & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Aliakbari, Saeideh & Hoffmann, Linda, 2011. "Forecasting corporate distress in the Asian and Pacific region," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-023, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    16. Stewart Jones, 2017. "Corporate bankruptcy prediction: a high dimensional analysis," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1366-1422, September.
    17. Harlan D. Platt & Marjorie B. Platt, 2008. "Financial Distress Comparison Across Three Global Regions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-34, December.
    18. fernández, María t. Tascón & gutiérrez, Francisco J. Castaño, 2012. "Variables y Modelos Para La Identificación y Predicción Del Fracaso Empresarial: Revisión de La Investigación Empírica Reciente," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 7-58.
    19. Dawen Yan & Guotai Chi & Kin Keung Lai, 2020. "Financial Distress Prediction and Feature Selection in Multiple Periods by Lassoing Unconstrained Distributed Lag Non-linear Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Zeineb Affes & Rania Hentati-Kaffel, 2019. "Forecast bankruptcy using a blend of clustering and MARS model: case of US banks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 281(1), pages 27-64, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4948-:d:1666267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.