IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4603-d1658113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Profitability

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyue Wu

    (School of Law and Public Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 211544, China)

  • Wenqian Liang

    (School of Law and Public Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 211544, China)

  • Qinglei Ying

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 211544, China)

  • Hongwei Dai

    (College of Electronic and Optical Engineering & College of Flexible Electronics (Future Technology), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 211544, China)

  • Haixin Chen

    (School of Law and Public Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 211544, China)

  • Jie Jiang

    (School of Law and Public Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 211544, China)

Abstract

The Chinese government places significant emphasis on high-quality, sustainable economic development, with the value of environmental information becoming increasingly prominent. Corporate stakeholders are paying greater attention to environmental disclosures. This study analyzes data from Chinese A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2008 to 2023, exploring the relationships and influence mechanisms among environmental information disclosure, profitability, and corporate sustainable development through multiple regression models. The results indicate that environmental information disclosure promotes corporate sustainable development (with an effect coefficient of 1.441, p < 0.01), while also enhancing profitability (with an effect coefficient of 0.009, p < 0.01). Moreover, profitability serves as a mediator in the relationship between environmental information disclosure and corporate sustainable development (with an effect coefficient of 1.089, p < 0.01). These findings remain robust after a series of tests. Heterogeneity studies further reveal that the positive impact of environmental disclosure on corporate sustainability performance is more pronounced among non-state-owned firms and firms with high leverage ratios. Overall, the research findings help encourage enterprises to prioritize environmental impact, practice sustainable operations, and enhance profitability, long-term competitiveness, and market adaptability.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyue Wu & Wenqian Liang & Qinglei Ying & Hongwei Dai & Haixin Chen & Jie Jiang, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4603-:d:1658113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingying Zhou & Zilin Shi & Fengyi Lei & Wanxuan Sun & Jiaxuan Zhang, 2022. "Effect of Environmental Information Disclosure on the Financing Efficiency of Enterprises—Evidence from China’s Listed Energy Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Luo, Yuanda & Xiong, Guobao & Mardani, Abbas, 2022. "Environmental information disclosure and corporate innovation: The “Inverted U-shaped” regulating effect of media attention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 453-463.
    3. Jia Li & Decai Tang & Acheampong Paul Tenkorang & Zhuoran Shi, 2021. "Research on Environmental Regulation and Green Total Factor Productivity in Yangtze River Delta: From the Perspective of Financial Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-24, November.
    4. S. Zeng & X. Xu & H. Yin & C. Tam, 2012. "Factors that Drive Chinese Listed Companies in Voluntary Disclosure of Environmental Information," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 309-321, September.
    5. Xiangyan Meng & Mingyuan Tang & Fanchao Kong & Shuai Li, 2022. "The Effect of Environmental Information Disclosure on Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Quasi-Natural Experiments on Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Yao Chen & Liang Chen, 2025. "Does Pollution Information Disclosure Affect Corporate Employment? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Ezhilarasi G. & K. C. Kabra, 2017. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Attributes on Environmental Disclosures: Evidence from India," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 10(1), pages 24-43, June.
    8. Branco, Manuel Castelo & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima, 2008. "Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese banks," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 161-181.
    9. Evans, Mary F. & Gilpatric, Scott M. & Liu, Lirong, 2009. "Regulation with direct benefits of information disclosure and imperfect monitoring," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 284-292, May.
    10. repec:gig:chaktu:v:40:y:2011:i:3:p:163-192 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Limin & Zhao, Jing, 2025. "Do politicians’ career concerns affect firms’ environmental information disclosure? Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    2. Linyan Fan & Sheng Yao, 2022. "Analyst Site Visits and Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Cao, Feng & Peng, Songlan (Stella) & Ye, Kangtao, 2019. "Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 287-309.
    4. Xue Yang & Yuandi Wang & Die Hu & Yongqiang Gao, 2018. "How industry peers improve your sustainable development? The role of listed firms in environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1313-1333, December.
    5. Dameng Hu & Yuanzhe Huang & Changbiao Zhong, 2021. "Does Environmental Information Disclosure Affect the Sustainable Development of Enterprises: The Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Shiliang Hu & Wenhao Dong & Yongchun Huang, 2023. "Analysts’ Green Coverage and Corporate Green Innovation in China: The Moderating Effect of Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Zhiying Ji & Xiao Yu & Jiefei Yang, 2020. "Environmental information disclosure in capital raising," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 183-214, September.
    8. Zhengxia He & Shichun Xu & Wenxing Shen & Meiling Wang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Exploring external and internal pressures on the environmental behavior of paper enterprises in China: A qualitative study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 951-969, September.
    9. Chen, Qian, 2024. "Media coverage, social trust and corporate financing efficiency," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    10. H. L. Zou & R. C. Zeng & S. X. Zeng & Jonathan J. Shi, 2015. "How Do Environmental Violation Events Harm Corporate Reputation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 836-854, December.
    11. Yuxuan Li & Xin Miao & Dequan Zheng & Yanhong Tang, 2019. "Corporate Public Transparency on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Political Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    12. John Stranlund & Carlos Chávez, 2013. "Who should bear the administrative costs of an emissions tax?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 53-79, August.
    13. Md. Abdul Kaium Masud & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Seong Mi Bae, 2018. "The effects of corporate governance on environmental sustainability reporting: empirical evidence from South Asian countries," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Yanming Sun & Jiashuo Chen & Qingli Li, 2025. "Based on Spatial–Regional Heterogeneity Perspective: Environmental Regulation Impacts on Green Transformation of Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-28, September.
    15. Victoria Bogdan & Claudia Diana Sabău-Popa & Marcel-Ioan Boloș & Dorina-Nicoleta Popa & Mărioara Beleneși, 2022. "Tracking Waste Management Information Disclosure Behavior Connected to Financial Performance through Moderating Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Xie, Linlin & Zuo, Shiyue & Xie, Ziqin, 2023. "Environmental protection fee-to-tax and enterprise investment efficiency: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Xu Dong & Yang Chen & Qinqin Zhuang & Yali Yang & Xiaomeng Zhao, 2022. "Agglomeration of Productive Services, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Analysis Based on 68 Prefectural-Level-and-Above Cities in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Eduardo Duque-Grisales & Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, 2021. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 315-334, January.
    19. Haoming Ding & Zerui Wang, 2025. "The Influence of Institutional Pressures on Environmental, Social, and Governance Responsibility Fulfillment: Insights from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Patel, Pankaj C. & Pearce, John A. & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2021. "Not so myopic: Investors lowering short-term growth expectations under high industry ESG-sales-related dynamism and predictability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 551-563.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4603-:d:1658113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.