IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16699-d1002410.html

Effect of Environmental Information Disclosure on the Financing Efficiency of Enterprises—Evidence from China’s Listed Energy Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Yingying Zhou

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Zilin Shi

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Fengyi Lei

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Wanxuan Sun

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Jiaxuan Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

In recent years, China has made it clear that the whole society should constantly enhance its awareness of ecological and environmental protection and promote the development of public safety and health. For listed energy enterprises, it is the responsibility of the enterprise to disclose the extent of environmental pollution in the development process to the whole society. The environmental information disclosure of energy enterprises not only promotes social and environmental protection but also has an impact on the financing efficiency of the enterprises themselves. After screening all A-share listed energy enterprises in China and eliminating the non-adoptable samples, 182 listed energy enterprises were finally selected as the research samples. Based on the data samples of 182 A-share listed energy industry enterprises in China from 2012 to 2019, this paper empirically tests the relationship between environmental information disclosure and corporate financing efficiency. The study finds that the environmental information disclosure has a significant positive impact on corporate financing efficiency, and the mediating effect model is used to analyze the intermediary role of corporate social responsibility in the impact of corporate environmental information disclosure on financing efficiency. This study expands the economic impact of corporate environmental information disclosure, improves the research framework on corporate financing efficiency, and provides informative suggestions for energy enterprises to improve financing efficiency and long-term development. In addition, the research shows that the environmental information disclosure and corporate social responsibility of listed energy enterprises in China still need to be improved, and the government and regulatory authorities should strengthen relevant policy constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingying Zhou & Zilin Shi & Fengyi Lei & Wanxuan Sun & Jiaxuan Zhang, 2022. "Effect of Environmental Information Disclosure on the Financing Efficiency of Enterprises—Evidence from China’s Listed Energy Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16699-:d:1002410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhenyu Jiang & Zongjun Wang & Yanqi Zeng, 2020. "Can voluntary environmental regulation promote corporate technological innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 390-406, February.
    2. Rui Albuquerque & Yrjö Koskinen & Chendi Zhang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4451-4469, October.
    3. Marcel C. Minutolo & Werner D. Kristjanpoller & John Stakeley, 2019. "Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1083-1095, September.
    4. Sang Jun Cho & Chune Young Chung & Jason Young, 2019. "Study on the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, January.
    5. Marco Taliento & Christian Favino & Antonio Netti, 2019. "Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information on Economic Performance: Evidence of a Corporate ‘Sustainability Advantage’ from Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Alkaraan, Fadi & Albitar, Khaldoon & Hussainey, Khaled & Venkatesh, VG, 2022. "Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Jun Xie & Wataru Nozawa & Michiyuki Yagi & Hidemichi Fujii & Shunsuke Managi, 2019. "Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 286-300, February.
    8. Ali Meftah Gerged & Lara Mohammad Al-Haddad & Meshari O. Al-Hajri, 2020. "Is earnings management associated with corporate environmental disclosure?," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 167-185, January.
    9. Mohan Fonseka & Theja Rajapakse & Gao‐Liang Tian, 2019. "The Effects of Environmental Information Disclosure and Energy Types on the Cost of Equity: Evidence from the Energy Industry in China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 55(2), pages 362-410, June.
    10. Bhattacharyya, Asit & Rahman, Md Lutfur, 2019. "Mandatory CSR expenditure and firm performance," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanwei Zhang & Haibin Liu & Xuena Liu, 2025. "Research on the Debt Financing Constraints of Steel Enterprises from the Perspective of Environmental Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Xinyue Wu & Wenqian Liang & Qinglei Ying & Hongwei Dai & Haixin Chen & Jie Jiang, 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Zhang, Ruchuan & Gao, Weiyan & Chen, Shanshan & Zhou, Li & Li, Aijun, 2024. "Dose digital transformation contribute to improving financing efficiency? Evidence and implications for energy enterprises in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbosa, Anrafel de Souza & Crispim, Maria Cristina & da Silva, Luiz Bueno & da Silva, Jonhatan Magno Norte & Barbosa, Aglaucibelly Maciel & Correia, Lucas Miguel Alencar de Morais & Morioka, Sandra N, 2025. "Empirical analysis of workers' perceptions of ESG impacts on corporate sustainability performance: A methodological innovation combining the PLS-SEM, PROMETHEE-ROC and FIMIX-PLS methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Gaurav Jyoti & Ashu Khanna, 2024. "How does sustainability performance affect firms' market performance? An empirical investigation in the Indian context," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20457-20483, August.
    3. Giovanni Cardillo & Ennio Bendinelli & Giuseppe Torluccio, 2023. "COVID‐19, ESG investing, and the resilience of more sustainable stocks: Evidence from European firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 602-623, January.
    4. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Hadiqa Ahmad & Muhammad Yaqub & Seung Hwan Lee, 2024. "Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 2965-2987, February.
    6. Victoria Bogdan & Claudia Diana Sabău-Popa & Marcel-Ioan Boloș & Dorina-Nicoleta Popa & Mărioara Beleneși, 2022. "Tracking Waste Management Information Disclosure Behavior Connected to Financial Performance through Moderating Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti, 2021. "Banks' business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2656-2670, July.
    8. Marcia Sierdovski & Luiz Alberto Pilatti & Priscila Rubbo, 2022. "Organizational Competencies in the Development of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria in the Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Yasmine Souissi & Anis Jarboui, 2025. "Does Corporate Governance Shape the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Financial Distress in Large European Companies?," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 15(1), pages 57-82.
    10. Ramírez-Orellana, Alicia & Martínez-Victoria, MCarmen & García-Amate, Antonio & Rojo-Ramírez, Alfonso A., 2023. "Is the corporate financial strategy in the oil and gas sector affected by ESG dimensions?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Yan Zhao & Yubin Gao & Diming Hong, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Sustainable Innovation and Economic Resilience: Deciphering ESG Ratings’ Role in Lowering Debt Financing Costs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4309-4343, March.
    12. Tingting Hu & Kun You & Char-Lee Lok, 2025. "State ownership, political connection and ESG performance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-33, February.
    13. D’Ecclesia, Rita Laura & Levantesi, Susanna & Stefanelli, Kevyn, 2024. "Measuring business impacts on the sustainability of European-listed firms," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Thi Ngan Pham & Phung Phi Tran & Minh-Hieu Le & Hoang Nhi Vo & Cong Dat Pham & Hai-Dang Nguyen, 2022. "The Effects of ESG Combined Score on Business Performance of Enterprises in the Transportation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Dong, Jinjin & Shao, Meirong, 2025. "The impact of technology for social good (TSG) on the effectiveness of corporate ESG self-regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    17. Chaudhry, Neeru & Dhawan, Priya, 2025. "CSR and exposure to systemic risk: Building resilience in non-financial firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Ali Meftah Gerged, 2021. "Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 609-629, January.
    19. Ali Meftah Gerged & Eshani Beddewela & Christopher J. Cowton, 2021. "Is corporate environmental disclosure associated with firm value? A multicountry study of Gulf Cooperation Council firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 185-203, January.
    20. Greta Falavigna & Roberto Ippoliti, 2022. "Financial constraints, investments, and environmental strategies: An empirical analysis of judicial barriers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2002-2018, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16699-:d:1002410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.