IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4315-d1652605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Disclosure in the Context of Combating Climate Change: Evidence from the Chinese Natural Gas Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Xufei Pang

    (College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China)

  • Peidong Zhang

    (College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China)

  • Zhen Guo

    (Coastal Science and Marine Policy Center, First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Xiaoping Jia

    (College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China)

  • Raymond R. Tan

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, De La Salle University, Manila 0922, Philippines)

  • Yanmei Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Xiaohan Qu

    (College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China)

Abstract

Natural gas (NG) is a key transitional energy source for clean energy transition. Against the backdrop of a grim climate change situation, the sustainable development of the Chinese NG industry is emphasized. Climate change disclosure (CCD) has become an important way for corporations to fulfill their social responsibility and demonstrate their capacity for sustainable development. In order to understand the current status of CCD in the Chinese NG industry and to improve the deficiencies, this paper assesses the quality of CCD in the Chinese NG industry. Climate change information is not fully covered by the existing quality evaluation systems. This study establishes a highly applicable system for evaluating the quality of CCD based on the theory pillar perspective. It includes the following five dimensions: completeness, balance, reliability, comparability, and understandability. This study evaluates the quality of CCD of 58 NG corporations using content analysis and quality evaluation index methods, incorporating Skip-Gram and CRITIC models. The evaluation results indicate that the quality of climate reports in the Chinese NG industry has shown general improvement over time; however, inconsistencies remain, making comparisons challenging. There are differences in the level of quality of CCD in the Chinese NG industry. Policy incentives with clear guidance and regional economic development conditions have a notable impact on the quality of CCD. For Chinese NG corporations themselves, disclosing climate change information related to risk management is the focus of narrowing the reporting gap. The CCD quality evaluation system constructed in this paper provides a theoretical reference for all industries to accurately promote disclosure quality. It also provides practical guidelines for corporations to identify weak links in CCD.

Suggested Citation

  • Xufei Pang & Peidong Zhang & Zhen Guo & Xiaoping Jia & Raymond R. Tan & Yanmei Zhang & Xiaohan Qu, 2025. "Information Disclosure in the Context of Combating Climate Change: Evidence from the Chinese Natural Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4315-:d:1652605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vosooghi, Sareh & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2022. "Information disclosure and dynamic climate agreements: Shall the IPCC reveal it all?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Nadia Ameli & Sumit Kothari & Michael Grubb, 2021. "Misplaced expectations from climate disclosure initiatives," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(11), pages 917-924, November.
    3. Grigoris Giannarakis & Eleni Zafeiriou & Nikolaos Sariannidis, 2017. "The Impact of Carbon Performance on Climate Change Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1078-1094, December.
    4. Bui, Binh & Houqe, Muhammad Nurul & Zaman, Mahbub, 2020. "Climate governance effects on carbon disclosure and performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    5. Zhang, Wen-Yao & Wei, Zong-Wen & Wang, Bing-Hong & Han, Xiao-Pu, 2016. "Measuring mixing patterns in complex networks by Spearman rank correlation coefficient," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 440-450.
    6. Lyton Chithambo & Ishmael Tingbani & Godfred Afrifa Agyapong & Ernest Gyapong & Isaac Sakyi Damoah, 2020. "Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1666-1683, May.
    7. Annabelle Braasch & Patrick Velte, 2023. "Climate reporting quality following the recommendations of the task force on climate‐related financial disclosures: A Focus on the German capital market," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 926-940, April.
    8. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2011. "Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 3-41, March.
    9. Girma, Sourafel & Gong, Yundan & Görg, Holger, 2009. "What Determines Innovation Activity in Chinese State-owned Enterprises? The Role of Foreign Direct Investment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 866-873, April.
    10. Melsa Ararat & Borhan Sayedy, 2019. "Gender and Climate Change Disclosure: An Interdimensional Policy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Petra F. A. Dilling & Peter Harris & Sinan Caykoylu, 2024. "The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Climate Governance Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-31, February.
    12. Pinglin He & Huayu Shen & Ying Zhang & Jing Ren, 2019. "External Pressure, Corporate Governance, and Voluntary Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Frederik Dahlmann & Jens K. Roehrich, 2019. "Sustainable supply chain management and partner engagement to manage climate change information," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1632-1647, December.
    14. Omri Even-Tov & Guoman She & Lynn Linghuan Wang & Detian Yang, 2025. "How government procurement shapes corporate climate disclosures, commitments, and actions," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1968-2014, June.
    15. Amel-Zadeh, Amir & Tang, Qingliang, 2025. "Managing the shift from voluntary to mandatory climate disclosure: The role of carbon accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    2. Kentaro Azuma & Akira Higashida, 2024. "Climate change disclosure and evolving institutional investor salience: Roles of the Principles for Responsible Investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3669-3686, May.
    3. Zola Berger‐Schmitz & Douglas George & Cameron Hindal & Richard Perkins & Maria Travaille, 2023. "What explains firms' net zero adoption, strategy and response?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5583-5601, December.
    4. Mumtaheena Anwar & Sohanur Rahman & Md. Nurul Kabir, 2021. "Does national carbon pricing policy affect voluntary environmental disclosures? A global evidence," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 211-244, April.
    5. Dong Ding & Bin Liu & Millicent Chang, 2023. "Carbon Emissions and TCFD Aligned Climate-Related Information Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 967-1001, February.
    6. Maida Hadziosmanovic & Shannon M. Lloyd & Anders Bjørn & Raymond L. Paquin & Nadine Mengis & H. Damon Matthews, 2022. "Using cumulative carbon budgets and corporate carbon disclosure to inform ambitious corporate emissions targets and long‐term mitigation pathways," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1747-1759, October.
    7. Maximilian Hettler & Lorenz Graf‐Vlachy, 2024. "Corporate scope 3 carbon emission reporting as an enabler of supply chain decarbonization: A systematic review and comprehensive research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 263-282, February.
    8. Suham Cahyono & Iman Harymawan & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Abu Hanifa Md. Noman, 2024. "Corporate business strategy, CEO's managerial ability, and environmental disclosure: The perspective of stakeholder theory," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8149-8189, December.
    9. Lily Hsueh, 2019. "Opening up the firm: What explains participation and effort in voluntary carbon disclosure by global businesses? An analysis of internal firm factors and dynamics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1302-1322, November.
    10. Andrew Bryant & Jennifer J. Griffin & Vanessa G. Perry, 2020. "Mitigating climate change: A role for regulations and risk‐taking," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 605-618, February.
    11. Chensi Guo & Wenyan Pan, 2022. "Research on Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure Mechanism of Enterprises from the Perspective of Stakeholders—A Case Study on the Automobile Manufacturing Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Douglas A. Adu & Naheed N. Roni, 2024. "Bank climate change initiatives, ownership structures, and corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence from emerging economies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3039-3077, May.
    13. Adu, Douglas A. & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Saa, Vida Y. & Boateng, Frank, 2024. "Bank sustainability, climate change initiatives and financial performance: The role of corporate governance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    14. Ayman Hassan Bazhair & Saleh F. A. Khatib & Hamzeh Al Amosh, 2022. "Taking Stock of Carbon Disclosure Research While Looking to the Future: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Gatti, Donatella, 2022. "Going green and (un)equal ? Political coalitions, redistribution, and the environment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Caroline Flammer & Michael W. Toffel & Kala Viswanathan, 2021. "Shareholder activism and firms' voluntary disclosure of climate change risks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1850-1879, October.
    17. Aaron K. Chatterji & David I. Levine & Michael W. Toffel, 2009. "How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 125-169, March.
    18. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    19. Heyes, Anthony & Lyon, Thomas P. & Martin, Steve, 2018. "Salience games: Private politics when public attention is limited," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 396-410.
    20. Lixiang Wang & Wendi Hou & Yupei Liu, 2023. "How do co‐shareholding networks affect negative media coverage? Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4221-4249, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4315-:d:1652605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.