IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p134-d1554840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biased Perception of Macroecological Findings Triggered by the IPCC—The Example of Wildfires

Author

Listed:
  • Carsten Hobohm

    (Ecology and Environmental Education, University of Flensburg (EUF), 24943 Flensburg, Germany)

  • Volker Müller-Benedict

    (Seminar for Social Sciences, Empirical Studies and Statistics, University of Flensburg (EUF), 24943 Flensburg, Germany)

Abstract

Global change and disturbance ecology, including the risks and benefits of wildfires for humans, sustainability of ecosystems and biodiversity, is a current research topic in applied science. Fires and their impacts are often considered in the context of climate change, carbon dioxide emissions and air pollution. Despite a significant decline in wildfires at the global scale in recent decades (cf. Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS)), it is a widespread conviction that the burned area is increasing due to global warming. In an attempt to identify how this discrepancy has arisen, we analysed IPCC reports from 2018–2023 via text mining including word frequency analyses and compared considerations about wildfires and fire weather with findings from ecology and public information on the internet. Both a negativity bias and repetition bias were identified. Numerous examples of disasters and models indicating a global increase of wildfires are composed of alarming messages. Examples of decreasing wildfires and the global decline are much less frequently communicated. Important facts are ignored, especially in summaries for policymakers. Measured against fire-ecological conditions and benefits for the nature, alarming trends and risks due to climate change are exaggerated. We therefore call for a comprising and differentiated reflection of ecological conditions and processes in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Carsten Hobohm & Volker Müller-Benedict, 2024. "Biased Perception of Macroecological Findings Triggered by the IPCC—The Example of Wildfires," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:134-:d:1554840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaval, Pamela & Loomis, John & Seidl, Andy, 2007. "Willingness-to-pay for prescribed fire in the Colorado (USA) wildland urban interface," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(8), pages 928-937, May.
    2. Shinichiro Asayama, 2024. "The history and future of IPCC special reports: A dual role of politicisation and normalisation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(9), pages 1-27, September.
    3. Ritodhi Chakraborty & Pasang Yangjee Sherpa, 2021. "From climate adaptation to climate justice: Critical reflections on the IPCC and Himalayan climate knowledges," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Wang, Yuhan & Lewis, David J., 2024. "Wildfires and climate change have lowered the economic value of western U.S. forests by altering risk expectations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Shahir Masri & Erica Anne Shenoi & Dana Rose Garfin & Jun Wu, 2023. "Assessing Perception of Wildfires and Related Impacts among Adult Residents of Southern California," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Fabián Guerrero & Carla Hernández & Mario Toledo & Lorena Espinoza & Yulian Carrasco & Andrés Arriagada & Ariel Muñoz & Lautaro Taborga & Jan Bergmann & Camilo Carmona, 2021. "Leaf Thermal and Chemical Properties as Natural Drivers of Plant Flammability of Native and Exotic Tree Species of the Valparaíso Region, Chile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-24, July.
    8. James Painter & Suzie Marshall & Katherine Leitzell, 2024. "Communicating climate futures: a multi-country study of how the media portray the IPCC scenarios in the 2021/2 Working Group reports," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(6), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Patricia A Champ & Hannah Brenkert‐Smith, 2016. "Is Seeing Believing? Perceptions of Wildfire Risk Over Time," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 816-830, April.
    10. Giuseppina Spano & Mario Elia & Onofrio Cappelluti & Giuseppe Colangelo & Vincenzo Giannico & Marina D’Este & Raffaele Lafortezza & Giovanni Sanesi, 2021. "Is Experience the Best Teacher? Knowledge, Perceptions, and Awareness of Wildfire Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel Wetts & James Painter & Loredana Loy, 2024. "The IPCC in the hybrid public sphere: divergent responses to climate mitigation solutions in mainstream and social media," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(12), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Jessica O’Reilly & Kari Pryck & Hannah Hughes, 2025. "Taking stock of the IPCC: analysis from AR6," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(8), pages 1-9, August.
    3. Shahir Masri & Erica Anne Shenoi & Dana Rose Garfin & Jun Wu, 2023. "Assessing Perception of Wildfires and Related Impacts among Adult Residents of Southern California," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Alló, M. & Loureiro, M.L., 2020. "Assessing preferences for wildfire prevention policies in Spain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 525-550, June.
    6. Campbell, Robert M. & Venn, Tyron J. & Anderson, Nathaniel M., 2016. "Social preferences toward energy generation with woody biomass from public forests in Montana, USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 58-67.
    7. Wang, Yuhan & Lewis, David J., 2025. "The impacts of climate-induced insect damage on timberland values in the southeastern U.S," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Friederike Hartz, 2024. "“We are not droids”– IPCC participants’ senses of responsibility and affective experiences across the production, assessment, communication and enactment of climate science," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(6), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Robert G. Ribe & Max Nielsen-Pincus & Bart R. Johnson & Chris Enright & David Hulse, 2022. "The Consequential Role of Aesthetics in Forest Fuels Reduction Propensities: Diverse Landowners’ Attitudes and Responses to Project Types, Risks, Costs, and Habitat Benefits," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-38, November.
    10. Matthew R. Auer, 2024. "Wildfire risk and insurance: research directions for policy scientists," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 459-484, June.
    11. Pamela McElwee, 2025. "A tale of two panels: learning and coordinating across IPCC, IPBES, and other science-policy interfaces," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Mary Sanford & James Painter & Taha Yasseri & Jamie Lorimer, 2021. "Controversy around climate change reports: a case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Catarina Archer de Carvalho & Mauro Raposo & Carlos Pinto-Gomes & Rute Matos, 2022. "Native or Exotic: A Bibliographical Review of the Debate on Ecological Science Methodologies: Valuable Lessons for Urban Green Space Design," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael & Aleixandre-Tudó, José Luis & Castelló-Cogollos, Lourdes & Aleixandre, José Luis, 2018. "Trends in global research in deforestation. A bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 293-302.
    15. Sayed M. Bateni & Fatemeh Rezaie & Trang Thi Kieu Tran & Changhyun Jun & Essam Heggy & Jason C. Knievel & Annette Menzel & Mir A. Matin & Azin Zarei & Venkataraman Lakshmi & Kaveh Madani, 2025. "Sustainability Nexus AID: wildfire," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-10, December.
    16. Remoundou, Kyriaki & Kountouris, Yiannis & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2012. "Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 381-395.
    17. Rodolfo Sapiains & Ana María Ugarte & Paulina Aldunce & Germant Marchant & Javier Alberto Romero & Mauro E. González & Valentina Inostroza-Lazo, 2020. "Local Perceptions of Fires Risk and Policy Implications in the Hills of Valparaíso, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Abolfazl Jaafari & Omid Rahmati & Eric K. Zenner & Davood Mafi-Gholami, 2022. "Anthropogenic activities amplify wildfire occurrence in the Zagros eco-region of western Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(1), pages 457-473, October.
    19. Czaja, Michael R. & Bright, Alan D. & Cottrell, Stuart P., 2016. "Integrative complexity, beliefs, and attitudes: Application to prescribed fire," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 54-61.
    20. Qin, Hua & Sanders, Christine & Prasetyo, Yanu & Syukron, Muh. & Prentice, Elizabeth, 2021. "Exploring the dynamic relationships between risk perception and behavior in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:134-:d:1554840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.