IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3790-d1386789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation-Based Resilience Evaluation for Urban Rail Transit Transfer Stations

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyao Yin

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Junhua Chen

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Yuexuan Li

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shang Yuan Cun, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

Disturbances often occur in transfer stations; however, little is known about the weaknesses of transfer stations and their ability to cope with passenger flows. Therefore, this paper introduces resilience into the study of transfer stations to enhance their emergency response processes and improve the sustainability of URT networks. It establishes a two-level fuzzy evaluation model, using the G1 weighting method, to assess resilience across various scenarios (daily operation, heavy passenger flow, and emergencies) and identify weaknesses; then, corresponding enhancement strategies are proposed. First, factor sets are established according to resilience stages, including rapidity before disturbance, robustness, redundancy, resourcefulness, and rapidity after disturbance. Using the G1 method, the weight matrix for each factor is calibrated, and a membership degree matrix is determined based on their affiliation with the review set. Multiplying the weight matrix and membership degree matrix yields the resilience value. We apply these steps to a representative station with the assistance of Anylogic simulation in calculating the hard-to-obtain data, yielding a peak-hour resilience value of 0.3425, which indicates a “poor” rating in the review set. By combining the peak-hour resilience with resilience curves under different multiples of peak-hour flows, an enhancement prioritization strategy is proposed for the station, which can act as a reference for the management of URT transfer stations.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyao Yin & Junhua Chen & Yuexuan Li, 2024. "Simulation-Based Resilience Evaluation for Urban Rail Transit Transfer Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3790-:d:1386789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liudan Jiao & Yinghan Zhu & Xiaosen Huo & Ya Wu & Yu Zhang, 2023. "Resilience assessment of metro stations against rainstorm disaster based on cloud model: a case study in Chongqing, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 2311-2337, March.
    2. Mingming Zheng & Hanzhang Zuo & Zitong Zhou & Yuhan Bai, 2023. "Recovery Strategies for Urban Rail Transit Network Based on Comprehensive Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Knoester, Max J. & Bešinović, Nikola & Afghari, Amir Pooyan & Goverde, Rob M.P. & van Egmond, Jochen, 2024. "A data-driven approach for quantifying the resilience of railway networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Tang, Junqing & Xu, Lei & Luo, Chunling & Ng, Tsan Sheng Adam, 2021. "Multi-disruption resilience assessment of rail transit systems with optimized commuter flows," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trucco, Paolo & Petrenj, Boris, 2023. "Characterisation of resilience metrics in full-scale applications to interdependent infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Hongyan Dui & Xinyue Wang & Haohao Zhou, 2023. "Redundancy-Based Resilience Optimization of Multi-Component Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Bešinović, Nikola & Ferrari Nassar, Raphael & Szymula, Christopher, 2022. "Resilience assessment of railway networks: Combining infrastructure restoration and transport management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Ilalokhoin, Ohis & Pant, Raghav & Hall, Jim W., 2023. "A model and methodology for resilience assessment of interdependent rail networks – Case study of Great Britain's rail network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    5. Zheng, Shuai & Liu, Yugang & Lin, Yexin & Wang, Qiang & Yang, Hongtai & Chen, Bin, 2022. "Bridging strategy for the disruption of metro considering the reliability of transportation system: Metro and conventional bus network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    6. Wang, Ziqi & Pei, Yulong & Zhang, Jianhua & Dong, Chuntong & Liu, Jing & Zhou, Dongyue, 2024. "Vulnerability analysis of public transit systems from the perspective of the traffic situation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 634(C).
    7. Wang, Xinglong & Peng, Jinhan & Tang, Junqing & Lu, Qiuchen & Li, Xiaowei, 2022. "Investigating the impact of adding new airline routes on air transportation resilience in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 79-95.
    8. Kuttler, Emma & Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh & Barker, Kash & González, Andrés D. & Johansson, Jonas, 2024. "Protection-interdiction-restoration for resilient multi-commodity networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Yin, Jiateng & Ren, Xianliang & Liu, Ronghui & Tang, Tao & Su, Shuai, 2022. "Quantitative analysis for resilience-based urban rail systems: A hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    10. Hu, Jie & Wen, Weiping & Zhai, Changhai & Pei, Shunshun, 2024. "Post-earthquake functionality assessment for urban subway systems: Incorporating the combined effects of seismic performance of structural and non-structural systems and functional interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    11. Wang, Ying & Zhao, Ou & Zhang, Limao, 2024. "Modeling urban rail transit system resilience under natural disasters: A two-layer network framework based on link flow," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    12. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.
    13. Qingjie Qi & Yangyang Meng & Xiaofei Zhao & Jianzhong Liu, 2022. "Resilience Assessment of an Urban Metro Complex Network: A Case Study of the Zhengzhou Metro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Chen, Dingjun & Fang, Xufeng & Li, Yao & Ni, Shaoquan & Zhang, Qingpeng & Sang, Chin Kwai, 2022. "Three-level multimodal transportation network for cross-regional emergency resources dispatch under demand and route reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Liu, Enze & Barker, Kash & Chen, Hong, 2022. "A multi-modal evacuation-based response strategy for mitigating disruption in an intercity railway system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Dui, Hongyan & Lu, Yaohui & Wu, Shaomin, 2024. "Competing risks-based resilience approach for multi-state systems under multiple shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    resilience; sustainability of urban rail transit; two-level fuzzy evaluation model; G1 weighting method; Anylogic simulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3790-:d:1386789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.