IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4569-d1657562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit System Planning Based on Integrated Empowerment Method and Matter-Element Model

Author

Listed:
  • Han Peng

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China
    School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

  • Yike Chen

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

  • Linjian Shangguan

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China
    School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

  • Shengnan Zhou

    (Department of Urban Construction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Yanchi Li

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

  • Qianyu Wang

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

Abstract

Urban rail transit system planning is significant for alleviating traffic congestion and optimizing spatial resource allocation in cities with scarce land resources. However, the long period of rail transit construction, large-scale investment, and its planning involve a variety of factors, which require scientific and reasonable evaluation methods to ensure that its construction can realize the expected economic and social benefits. To solve this problem, this study first establishes an appropriate evaluation system by selecting suitable evaluation indicators. Then, the comprehensive assignment method combining the ordinal relationship method (G1 method) and the improved entropy weight method is applied to assign weights to the indicators in the evaluation system, and the correlation degree is calculated by combining with the matter-element model for evaluating the planning scheme of the urban rail transit system. Finally, the urban rail transit system planning scheme of Zhengzhou City is verified by example. The results show that the proposed method can balance the practical significance and dynamics of the evaluation indices, evaluate the importance of each index more objectively, and provide methodological support for dynamic decision-making in rail transportation planning in the context of a smart city, which is of guiding significance for the sustainable development of the city.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Peng & Yike Chen & Linjian Shangguan & Shengnan Zhou & Yanchi Li & Qianyu Wang, 2025. "Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit System Planning Based on Integrated Empowerment Method and Matter-Element Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4569-:d:1657562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4569/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnston, Robert A. & DeLuchi, Mark A., 1989. "Evaluation Methods for Rail Transit Projects," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3s89711q, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Tianjun Feng & Yusong Liu & Chun Chen & Keke Liu & Chongjun Huang, 2024. "Traffic Safety Evaluation of Downstream Intersections on Urban Expressways Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process–Matter-Element Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Zhaoyang Cai & Jianwei Yan, 2018. "The planning and design of road network structure in urban railway transit hub areas," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 198-203.
    4. Xinyao Yin & Junhua Chen & Yuexuan Li, 2024. "Simulation-Based Resilience Evaluation for Urban Rail Transit Transfer Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Dung David Chuwang & Weiya Chen, 2022. "Forecasting Daily and Weekly Passenger Demand for Urban Rail Transit Stations Based on a Time Series Model Approach," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Pei Yin & Miaojuan Peng, 2023. "Station Layout Optimization and Route Selection of Urban Rail Transit Planning: A Case Study of Shanghai Pudong International Airport," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-29, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Wangtu & Lin, Weihua, 2016. "Selecting the public transit projects with PCA-DP technique: The example of Xiamen City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 56-71.
    2. Qin Li & Jingya Cui & Xingping Wu & Zonghao Chen & Shuangning Lv & Yijun Liu & Wenlong Li, 2025. "Evaluation of Rural Road Traffic Safety in Loess Plateau Gully Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. João Paulo Teixeira & Ulrich Gunter, 2023. "Editorial for Special Issue: “Tourism Forecasting: Time-Series Analysis of World and Regional Data”," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-3, February.
    4. Chu, Xuehao & Polzin, Steven E., 1998. "Considering build-later for major transit investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 393-405, August.
    5. Hong Xu & Jin Zhao & Xincan Yu & Xiaoxia Mei & Xinle Zhang & Chuanjie Yan, 2023. "A Model Assembly Approach of Planning Urban–Rural Transportation Network: A Case Study of Jiangxia District, Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4569-:d:1657562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.