IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3577-d1382008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Reduce College Students’ Food Waste Behavior: From the Perspective of College Canteen Catering Modes

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Wang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Xi Luo

    (State Key Laboratory of Green Building, School of Building Services Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Xiaojun Liu

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Yongkai Sun

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

Abstract

Reducing consumer food waste plays an important role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Considering the large number of colleges in China, with the largest enrollment in the world, it is especially important to address the issue of food waste among college students. However, the mechanisms underlying the effects that the college canteen catering modes have on the food-saving behavior of college students remain unclear. To fill this gap, an integrated theoretical framework model was constructed from the perspective of “psychological factors–behavioral intention–external environment–actual behavior” based on the theory of planned behavior, the norm activation model, and the attitude–context–behavior theory. Then, 422 valid questionnaires were empirically analyzed by structural equation modeling and hierarchical regression. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) Food-saving intention and herd mentality are the major drivers of college students’ food-saving behavior. Personal norms, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavior control, and health risk perception are influencing factors on food-saving intention, among which personal norms have the greatest effect. (2) The standard-quantity catering mode has an inhibitory moderating effect, while the large-/small-portion-size and buffet catering modes have promoting moderating effects in the transformation of food-saving intention into actual behavior. Notably, the moderating effects of the buffet catering mode are more pronounced than those of the large-/small-portion-size catering mode. (3) The standard-quantity catering mode has a promoting moderating effect, while the large-/small-portion-size and buffet catering modes have inhibitory moderating effects in the path of the negative impact of herd mentality on food-saving behavior. These conclusions can help colleges recommend strategies to avoid food waste on their campuses from the perspectives of both the individual student and the food provider.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Wang & Xi Luo & Xiaojun Liu & Yongkai Sun, 2024. "How to Reduce College Students’ Food Waste Behavior: From the Perspective of College Canteen Catering Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3577-:d:1382008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jingjing Wang & Mingyue Li & Sinan Li & Kai Chen, 2022. "Understanding Consumers’ Food Waste Reduction Behavior—A Study Based on Extended Norm Activation Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Charlene Elliott & Emily Truman & Nikki Stephenson, 2022. "Food Marketing and Power: Teen-Identified Indicators of Targeted Food Marketing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Aviva A. Musicus & Ghislaine C. Amsler Challamel & Robert McKenzie & Eric B. Rimm & Stacy A. Blondin, 2022. "Food Waste Management Practices and Barriers to Progress in U.S. University Foodservice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-9, May.
    4. Huilin Wang & Aweewan Mangmeechai, 2021. "Understanding the Gap between Environmental Intention and Pro-Environmental Behavior towards the Waste Sorting and Management Policy of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Mauro Viccaro & Adele Coppola & Maria Consiglia D’Angelo & Francesco Genovese & Severino Romano & Mario Cozzi, 2023. "Young People Are Not All the Same! The Theory of Planned Behaviour Applied to Food Waste Behaviour across Young Italian Generations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Liying Wang & Junya Wang & Pengxia Shen & Shangqing Liu & Shuwei Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Travel Behavior in Daily Residence and Tourism Destination: Based on TPB-ABC Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianca Cezara Archip & Ioan Banatean-Dunea & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag, 2023. "Determinants of Food Waste in Cluj-Napoca (Romania): A Community-Based System Dynamics Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Yongliang Yang & Yuting Zhu & Xiaopeng Wang & Yi Li, 2022. "The Perception of Environmental Information Disclosure on Rural Residents’ Pro-Environmental Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Lee, Stacy H.N. & Chang, Hyo Jung (Julie) & Zhao, Li, 2023. "The importance of personal norms and situational expectancies to sustainable behaviors: The norm activation and situational expectancy-value theories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Kareem Abdul Waheed & Abhilasha Singh & Ayisha Siddiqua & Maisa El Gamal & Mohammed Laeequddin, 2023. "E-Waste Recycling Behavior in the United Arab Emirates: Investigating the Roles of Environmental Consciousness, Cost, and Infrastructure Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Huilin Wang & Ziqing Xu & Jingyu Yang & Dan Huang, 2023. "Promoting Physical Activity among Working Women: The Influence of Perceived Policy Effectiveness and Health Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
    6. Małgorzata Miśniakiewicz & Vera Amicarelli & Grzegorz Chrobak & Agnieszka Górka-Chowaniec & Christian Bux, 2024. "Do Living Arrangements and Eating Habits Influence University Students’ Food Waste Perception in Italy and Poland?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Jian Cao & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison & Wei Wei, 2022. "The Role of Social Capital in Predicting Tourists’ Waste Sorting Intentions in Rural Destinations: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Ju Yeon Shin & Eojina Kim & Yoon Jung Jang & Manisha Singal, 2024. "Mindful Choices: Unveiling the Driving Factors behind Consumers’ Intention to Reduce Single-Use Plastic Utensils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Zisis Kozlakidis, 2023. "Promoting Health for Adolescents: An Editorial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-4, July.
    10. Xingping Cao & Junlin Qiu & Leyu Wang & Gefen Zhou, 2022. "An Integrative Model of Tourists’ Pro-Environmental Behavior Based on the Dual Path of Rational Planning and Embodied Emotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Jun-Yin So & Ying Kwok & Christie Lai & Hei-Wut Fong & Lee-Yan Pang, 2023. "Underwater Impact and Intention–Behaviour Gap of Scuba Divers on Coral Communities in Hong Kong SAR, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Wenchun Ran & Ling Zhang, 2023. "Bridging the intention-behavior gap in mobile phone recycling in China: the effect of consumers’ price sensitivity and proactive personality," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 938-959, January.
    13. Fei Zheng & Chenguang Zhao & Ahmad S. Ajina & Petra Poulova, 2023. "Decoding the Dilemma of Consumer Food Over-Ordering in Restaurants: An Augmented Theory of Planned Behavior Model Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Huilin Wang & Jiaxuan Li & Aweewan Mangmeechai & Jiafu Su, 2021. "Linking Perceived Policy Effectiveness and Proenvironmental Behavior: The Influence of Attitude, Implementation Intention, and Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Xintian Wang & Zhangchi Wang & Yan Li, 2022. "Internet Use on Closing Intention–Behavior Gap in Green Consumption—A Mediation and Moderation Theoretical Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3577-:d:1382008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.