IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2549-d1360438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Domain Intersection and Knowledge Evolution—The Development of the Fields of Social Innovation and Design Education

Author

Listed:
  • Jui-Che Tu

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan)

  • Xu Zhang

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
    School of Arts, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

  • Xipeng Liao

    (School of Arts, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China)

Abstract

This paper synthesizes the literature from the fields of design education and social innovation to obtain a complete understanding of the development of these fields’ knowledge, and it also compares and cross-analyzes the two fields to determine the entry point for combining the knowledge in both fields. Two types of bibliometric software were used to capture and classify the data, and descriptive statistical analysis, co-occurrence analysis of keywords, knowledge evolution analysis of studies cited in both fields, and burst analysis were conducted. The results reveal that integrating technology into the field of design education in combination with shifting the focus from enhancing students’ professional competence to enhancing their overall competence can contribute to the improvement of design education quality. This is in the context of empathy research becoming a trend. Furthermore, the field of social innovation defines “social innovation” as a mutual agreement between practice and theory to promote solutions to society’s problems. The research in this field covers all aspects of social life and has a complex disciplinary background. The field of social innovation is currently mostly concerned with the relationship between universities and social innovation practices. The burst analysis reveals that open innovation is becoming a common focus of both fields and is developing into a popular research topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xipeng Liao, 2024. "Analysis of Domain Intersection and Knowledge Evolution—The Development of the Fields of Social Innovation and Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2549-:d:1360438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per G. Svensson & Marion E. Hambrick, 2019. "Exploring how external stakeholders shape social innovation in sport for development and peace," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 540-552, October.
    2. Thomas Maak & Nicolas Stoetter, 2012. "Social Entrepreneurs as Responsible Leaders: ‘Fundación Paraguaya’ and the Case of Martin Burt," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 413-430, December.
    3. Edwards-Schachter, Mónica & Wallace, Matthew L., 2017. "‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-79.
    4. María José Sanzo-Perez & Luis Ignacio Álvarez-González & Marta Rey-García, 2015. "How to encourage social innovations: a resource-based approach," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7-8), pages 430-447, May.
    5. Dmitri Domanski & Jürgen Howaldt & Christoph Kaletka, 2020. "A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 454-474, March.
    6. Bellandi, Marco & Donati, Letizia & Cataneo, Alessandra, 2021. "Social innovation governance and the role of universities: Cases of quadruple helix partnerships in Italy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Souza João-Roland, Iraci & Granados, Maria L., 2023. "Towards social innovation strategy: An analysis of UK social enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. van den Broek, Tijs & van Veenstra, Anne Fleur, 2018. "Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 330-338.
    3. Manuela Rösing Agostini & Luciana Marques Vieira, 2017. "An Overview On Social Innovation Research: Guiding Future Studies," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(4), pages 385-402, July.
    4. Julia Maria Wittmayer & Tessa de Geus & Bonno Pel & F. Avelino & Sabine Hielscher & Thomas Hoppe & Marie Susan Mühlemeier & Agata Stasik & Sem Oxenaar & Karoline K.S. Rogge & Vivian Visser & Esther Ma, 2020. "Beyond instrumentalism: Broadening the understanding of social innovation in socio-technical energy systems," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/312323, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Asta Valackienė & Rafał Nagaj, 2021. "Shared Taxonomy for the Implementation of Responsible Innovation Approach in Industrial Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Yuka Fujimoto & Jasim Uddin, 2022. "Inclusive Leadership for Reduced Inequality: Economic–Social–Economic Cycle of Inclusion," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 563-582, December.
    8. Sofia Morgado, 2021. "Urban Rehabilitation, Social Innovation, and New Working Spaces in Lisbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Angela Colucci, 2023. "Resilience Practices Contribution Enabling European Landscape Policy Innovation and Implementation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Louis Moustakas & Lisa Kalina, 2022. "Learning Football for Good: The Development and Evaluation of the Football3 MOOC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    12. Svensson, Per G. & Andersson, Fredrik O. & Mahoney, Tara Q. & Ha, Jae-Pil, 2020. "Antecedents and outcomes of social innovation: A global study of sport for development and peace organizations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 657-670.
    13. Camaren Peter, 2021. "Social Innovation for Sustainable Urban Developmental Transitions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Leveraging Economic Ecosystems and the Entrepreneurial State," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Hugo Pinto & Carla Nogueira & J. André Guerreiro & Fábio Sampaio, 2021. "Social Innovation and the Role of the State: Learning from the Portuguese Experience on Multi-Level Interactions," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Terstriep, Judith & Wloka, Laura-Fee & Martini, Verena, 2022. "Soziale Innovationen & Unterstützungsinfrastrukturen in Innovationsökosystemen: Eine Gegenüberstellung theoretischer Konzepte und der Bedarfe Sozialer Innovator:innen," Forschung Aktuell 10/2022, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    16. Chen-Yueh Chen & Ya-Lun Chou & Chun-Shih Lee, 2021. "Social Innovation, Employee Value Cocreation, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in a Sport-Related Social Enterprise: Mediating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-10, November.
    17. Igor Calzada, 2021. "The Right to Have Digital Rights in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-28, October.
    18. Carolina Andion & Graziela Dias Alperstedt & Julia Furlanetto Graeff & Luciana Ronconi, 2022. "Social innovation ecosystems and sustainability in cities: a study in Florianópolis, Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1259-1281, January.
    19. Rita Vasconcellos Oliveira, 2021. "Social Innovation for a Just Sustainable Development: Integrating the Wellbeing of Future People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-12, August.
    20. María Helena Jaén & Ezequiel Reficco & Gabriel Berger, 2021. "Does Integrity Matter in BOP Ventures? The Role of Responsible Leadership in Inclusive Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 467-488, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2549-:d:1360438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.