IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i21p11925-d666844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Rehabilitation, Social Innovation, and New Working Spaces in Lisbon

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Morgado

    (CIAUD, Lisbon School of Architecture, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-063 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

This study brings together three subjects: urban rehabilitation, social innovation, and new working spaces, envisaging an intersectoral viewpoint, focusing on a European city, Lisbon, arguing that the public sector holds the capacity to consistently drive positive achievements in this respect. This study involves analyzing policy, governance, and urban planning documents in force, observation and spatial analysis using open-source databases, and stakeholder interviews. The result is in line with the primary research plea applied to the case study, and conclusions show that public intervention, whenever applied systematically from the city vision to local plans, resorting to close bonds between the sites and the communities in a participatory and collaborative way, may lead to urban rehabilitation and social innovation through the inception and development of new working spaces. The study was designed while researching as a member of COST CA18214 (The Geography of New Working Spaces and the Impact on the Periphery).

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Morgado, 2021. "Urban Rehabilitation, Social Innovation, and New Working Spaces in Lisbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11925-:d:666844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11925/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/11925/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor Cabral & Willem Van Winden, 2016. "Coworking: an analysis of coworking strategies for interaction and innovation," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 357-377.
    2. Bruce Stiftel, 2021. "Are We Kidding Ourselves That Research Leads Practice?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 154-155.
    3. Ilaria Mariotti & Carolina Pacchi & Stefano Di Vita, 2017. "Co-working Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 47-66, July.
    4. Dmitri Domanski & Jürgen Howaldt & Christoph Kaletka, 2020. "A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 454-474, March.
    5. Mina Di Marino & Johanna Lilius & Kimmo Lapintie, 2018. "New forms of multi-local working: identifying multi-locality in planning as well as public and private organizations’ strategies in the Helsinki region," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(10), pages 2015-2035, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harald A. Mieg, 2022. "Social Innovation in Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-4, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xipeng Liao, 2024. "Analysis of Domain Intersection and Knowledge Evolution—The Development of the Fields of Social Innovation and Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Di Matteo, Dante & Mariotti, Ilaria & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Transport infrastructure and economic performance: An evaluation of the Milan-Bologna high-speed rail corridor," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Swantje Robelski & Helena Keller & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2019. "Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Nina Thornton & Martin Engert & Andreas Hein & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "Finding new purpose for vacancies in rural areas: a taxonomy of coworking space business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1395-1423, September.
    7. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sven M. Laudien & Viktor Fredrich & Lars Görmar, 2018. "Coopetition in coworking-spaces: value creation and appropriation tensions in an entrepreneurial space," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 385-410, March.
    8. Hugo Pinto & Carla Nogueira & J. André Guerreiro & Fábio Sampaio, 2021. "Social Innovation and the Role of the State: Learning from the Portuguese Experience on Multi-Level Interactions," World, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Terstriep, Judith & Wloka, Laura-Fee & Martini, Verena, 2022. "Soziale Innovationen & Unterstützungsinfrastrukturen in Innovationsökosystemen: Eine Gegenüberstellung theoretischer Konzepte und der Bedarfe Sozialer Innovator:innen," Forschung Aktuell 10/2022, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    10. Eva Coll-Martínez, 2019. "Creativity and the city: testing the attenuation of agglomeration economies in Barcelona," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(3), pages 365-395, September.
    11. Ioulia Poulaki & Eleni Mavragani & Alexandra Kaziani & Eleftheria Chatzimichali, 2023. "Digital Nomads: Advances in Hospitality and Destination Attractiveness," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Fang Zhao & Catherine Prentice & Joseph Wallis & Arvind Patel & Marie-France Waxin, 2020. "An integrative study of the implications of the rise of coworking spaces in smart cities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 467-486, December.
    13. Carolina Andion & Graziela Dias Alperstedt & Julia Furlanetto Graeff & Luciana Ronconi, 2022. "Social innovation ecosystems and sustainability in cities: a study in Florianópolis, Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1259-1281, January.
    14. Weiwu Wang & Jingyi Liang & Jie Niu, 2022. "Site Selection of Co-Working Spaces under the Influence of Multiple Factors: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Thomas W. Sanchez, 2021. "Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 89-92.
    16. Guy Baudelle & Sébastien Bourdin & Louis-Thibault Buron & Clément Marinos, 2023. "Third Places in France: what Role for Areas Outside the Metropolis? [Les tiers-lieux en France : quelle place pour les zones hors métropole ?]," Post-Print hal-04302219, HAL.
    17. Victor Cabral & Willem Winden, 2022. "The reaction of coworking spaces to the COVID-19 pandemic. A dynamic capabilities perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(2), pages 257-281, June.
    18. Alexandra Rese & Lars Görmar & Alena Herbig, 2022. "Social networks in coworking spaces and individual coworker’s creativity," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 391-428, February.
    19. Ilaria Mariotti & Mina Akhavan, 2021. "Gli spazi di coworking prima e durante la pandemia covid-19: tipologie, geografia ed effetti," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 66-84.
    20. Bruno Trapanese & Ilaria Mariotti, 2022. "Socio-Cultural Hybrid Spaces in Milan Coping with the Covid-19 Pandemic," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 16(2), pages 39-59, DECEMBER.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:21:p:11925-:d:666844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.