IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i1p516-554.html

Competing narratives inhibit a circular economy for bio‐based plastic packaging: Insights from a social innovation lab study in Brazil, Canada, Poland and the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Belinda Li
  • Jordon Lazell
  • Macarena Beltran
  • Grażyna Kędzia
  • Lais Roncalho Lima
  • Tammara Soma
  • Sandra Andrea Cruz
  • Rafaela Francisconi Gutierrez
  • Jolanta Turek
  • Marta Raźniewska
  • Aneta Pluta‐Zaremba
  • Benny Tjahjono

Abstract

Businesses are turning to bio‐based, compostable plastic packaging as a circular economy solution to global plastic pollution. However, there is a lack of proper waste management systems for collection and processing. Through an international research initiative, a social innovation lab was undertaken in Brazil, Canada, Poland and the United Kingdom to understand and address key barriers in closing the bio‐based plastic packaging loop. Based upon a qualitative data set of 100 stakeholder interviews and three phases of workshop activities in each country, a grounded model was generated to illustrate how competing views and actions are inhibiting a circular system for bio‐based plastic packaging. Key issues were the lack of end‐of‐life processing infrastructure, contamination in processing facilities and absent or ineffective regulation. A systemic approach that includes shared responsibility for infrastructure, simplified packaging design and materials and equitable regulation to reduce susceptibility to greenwashing can improve collaboration to meet circular goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Belinda Li & Jordon Lazell & Macarena Beltran & Grażyna Kędzia & Lais Roncalho Lima & Tammara Soma & Sandra Andrea Cruz & Rafaela Francisconi Gutierrez & Jolanta Turek & Marta Raźniewska & Aneta Pluta, 2025. "Competing narratives inhibit a circular economy for bio‐based plastic packaging: Insights from a social innovation lab study in Brazil, Canada, Poland and the UK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 516-554, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:516-554
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3997
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael McGann & Emma Blomkamp & Jenny M. Lewis, 2018. "The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(3), pages 249-267, September.
    2. Tiberio Daddi & Domenico Ceglia & Guia Bianchi & Marcia Dutra de Barcellos, 2019. "Paradoxical tensions and corporate sustainability: A focus on circular economy business cases," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 770-780, July.
    3. Ayşe Lisa Allison & Fabiana Lorencatto & Susan Michie & Mark Miodownik, 2021. "Barriers and Enablers to Buying Biodegradable and Compostable Plastic Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Hervé Corvellec & Alison F. Stowell & Nils Johansson, 2022. "Critiques of the circular economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 421-432, April.
    5. Sebastian Hinderer & Andreas Kuckertz, 2022. "The bioeconomy transformation as an external enabler of sustainable entrepreneurship," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2947-2963, November.
    6. Meeks, Diana & Hottle, Troy & Bilec, M.M. & Landis, A.E., 2015. "Compostable biopolymer use in the real world: Stakeholder interviews to better understand the motivations and realities of use and disposal in the US," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 134-142.
    7. Wei Liu & Zicheng Zhu & Songhe Ye, 2023. "A Framework Towards Design for Circular Packaging (DfCP): Design Knowledge, Challenges and Opportunities," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 2109-2125, December.
    8. Macarena Beltran & Benny Tjahjono & Anna Bogush & Jorge Julião & Evandro L. S. Teixeira, 2021. "Food Plastic Packaging Transition towards Circular Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Ewa Kochańska & Rafał M. Łukasik & Maciej Dzikuć, 2021. "New Circular Challenges in the Development of Take-Away Food Packaging in the COVID-19 Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Antonis Skouloudis & Chrysovalantis Malesios & Demetris-Francis Lekkas & Altani Panagiotopoulou, 2023. "Consumer Preferences in Greece for Bio-Based Products: a Short Communication," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1065-1076, June.
    11. Dmitri Domanski & Jürgen Howaldt & Christoph Kaletka, 2020. "A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 454-474, March.
    12. Sara Moggi & Renata Paola Dameri, 2021. "Circular business model evolution: Stakeholder matters for a self‐sufficient ecosystem," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2830-2842, September.
    13. Leipold, Sina & Weldner, Kaja & Hohl, Marius, 2021. "Do we need a ‘circular society’? Competing narratives of the circular economy in the French food sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Tony R. Walker & Eamonn McGuinty & Sylvain Charlebois & Janet Music, 2021. "Single-use plastic packaging in the Canadian food industry: consumer behavior and perceptions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deniz Turkcu & Nina Tura & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of the Sustainability Challenges Experienced during the Life Cycle of Biobased Packaging Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. David Monciardini & Laura Rocca & Monica Veneziani, 2024. "Virtuous circles: Transformative impact and challenges of the social and solidarity circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 642-660, February.
    3. Aslıhan Kıymalıoğlu & Raife Meltem Yetkiän Özbük & Duygu Aydın Ünal & Onur Dirlik & Nuray Akar, 2024. "Unpacking Sustainable Packaging Through the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    4. Urmanaviciene Audrone & Kostalova Jana & Baturina Danijel & Krzyworzeka Paweł & Budrytė Paulina & Lepik Katri-Liis, 2022. "Were Social Labs immune to COVID-19? Impacts and benefits," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(s1), pages 381-401, October.
    5. Sahra Svensson-Hoglund & Jennifer D. Russell & Jessika Luth Richter & Paul Dewick & Leonidas Milios & Martin Calisto Friant & Anne P. M. Velenturf & Marianna Lena Kambanou & Rich Grousset & Sandra Gol, 2026. "Advancing Our Understanding of CE Loop Strategies: A Synthesizing Framework for Durable Consumer Products," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-33, April.
    6. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    7. Abdollah Mohammadparst Tabas & Mohsin Abdur Rehman & Fatima Khitous & Andrea Urbinati, 2025. "Stakeholder and customer engagement in circular economy ecosystems: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 402-416, January.
    8. Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xipeng Liao, 2024. "Analysis of Domain Intersection and Knowledge Evolution—The Development of the Fields of Social Innovation and Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Karimzadeh, Sara, 2026. "Waste delinking: A pathway to degrowth?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Kawther Saeedi & Anna Visvizi & Dimah Alahmadi & Amal Babour, 2023. "Smart Cities and Households’ Recyclable Waste Management: The Case of Jeddah," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Risa Arai & Martin Calisto Friant & Walter J. V. Vermeulen, 2024. "The Japanese Circular Economy and Sound Material-Cycle Society Policies: Discourse and Policy Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 619-650, March.
    12. Schiuma, Giovanni & Santarsiero, Francesco, 2023. "Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    14. Naila Erum & Kazi Musa & Saira Tufail & Jamaliah Said & Nor Balkish Zakaria, 2025. "Impact of the circular economy on human development: evidence from Germany," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(12), pages 30385-30410, December.
    15. Zezhong Zhao & Yajuan Li & Zhiyang Du, 2022. "Seafood Waste-Based Materials for Sustainable Food Packing: From Waste to Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Ryan Anders Whitney & David López-García, 2023. "Fast-track institutionalization: The opening of urban planning best practice agencies in Mexico City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 600-616, May.
    17. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Natalia Restrepo, 2019. "The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance—The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Alessandro Pollini & Alessandro Caforio, 2021. "Participation and Iterative Experiments: Designing Alternative Futures with Migrants and Service Providers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Vasco Fonseca & Joaquim Caeiro & Fernanda Nogueira, 2021. "Social Model—Innovation and Behavioural Intervention as a Public Policy of Action within an Oncology and Loneliness Scope," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-7, February.
    20. Dimitri Petrik & Gero Strobel & Thorsten Schoormann & Frederik Möller & Christoph Hoppe-Ludwig & Virginia Springer, 2026. "Digital product passports," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:516-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.