IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p2062-d1349806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Cultural Tourism: Proposal for a Comparative Indicator-Based Framework in European Destinations

Author

Listed:
  • Mikel Zubiaga

    (Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Amaia Sopelana

    (Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Alessandra Gandini

    (Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi Pasealekua 2, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Héctor M. Aliaga

    (Cultur Viajes, C/Colmenares, 11 Bajo, 28004 Madrid, Spain)

  • Tarmo Kalvet

    (Institute of Baltic Studies, Lai 30, 51005 Tartu, Estonia)

Abstract

Effective decision-making in tourism destinations relies significantly on employing suitable indicators for policy design and impact evaluation. However, the adoption of sustainability-focused indicators remains constrained in the field of cultural tourism. The purpose of this research is to provide decision-makers with an extensive array of criteria and indicators, enabling informed decision-making, policy formulation, and impact assessment tailored to the distinctive attributes encountered in European destinations. Based on the synthesis of existing approaches, and in co-creation with 21 European tourism destinations, an indicator-based framework is proposed, structured around the environmental, economic, social, cultural, resilience, and characterization domains. The results are particularly novel in the resilience and cultural domains, related to the recovery from crisis impacts, but also to the enhancement of digital approaches, as well as the preservation and promotion of cultural heritage towards a more hospitable destination. Moreover, the involvement of stakeholders incorporating real-case scenarios allows this research to bridge the gap between theoretical constructs and practical application. The indicator-based framework resulting from this research will provide stakeholders with assistance in assessing and comparing the impacts of cultural tourism on their destinations and, thence, help them acquire knowledge on cultural resource management, contributing to a more sustainable, responsible, and balanced impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikel Zubiaga & Amaia Sopelana & Alessandra Gandini & Héctor M. Aliaga & Tarmo Kalvet, 2024. "Sustainable Cultural Tourism: Proposal for a Comparative Indicator-Based Framework in European Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2062-:d:1349806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2062/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/2062/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Xue & Xie, Chengyuan & Huang, Lu & Wang, Yaru & Han, Tongyun, 2023. "How digitalization promotes the sustainable integration of culture and tourism for economic recovery," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 988-1000.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youssef El Archi & Brahim Benbba & Kai Zhu & Zineb El Andaloussi & László Pataki & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Mapping the Nexus between Sustainability and Digitalization in Tourist Destinations: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Liu, Nan & Teng, Long & Tian, Wenjuan & Li, Ying, 2023. "Does digitalization enhance fossil fuels resources efficiency?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Zhanna Chupina & Alexander Chursin & Andrew Boginsky & Ivan Kvasov, 2023. "Sustainable Economic Development of Enterprises: A Methodology Based on the Toolkit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Hanzhi Zhang & Jingfeng Zhang & Chih-Hung Pai, 2024. "Promoting carbon neutrality and green growth through cultural industry financing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Lapuz, Mark Chris M., 2023. "The role of local community empowerment in the digital transformation of rural tourism development in the Philippines," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:2062-:d:1349806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.