IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1606-d1338999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Process Management Model to Improve Productivity and Reduce Waste

Author

Listed:
  • César Ortiz

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University de Santiago de Chile, Víctor Jara Avenue 3769, Santiago 9170124, Chile)

  • Luis Quezada

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University de Santiago de Chile, Víctor Jara Avenue 3769, Santiago 9170124, Chile)

  • Astrid Oddershede

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University de Santiago de Chile, Víctor Jara Avenue 3769, Santiago 9170124, Chile)

Abstract

One of the challenges facing operations management is the design, choice, and implementation of action plans adapted to the magnitude of the deviations from the variables of an industrial process. Making conscious and quick decisions is crucial to achieving improvements in productivity. This will be achieved if the organization’s internal and external communication model is strategically designed, considering specific cultural factors and the symmetry or asymmetry required in the communication model. However, how do we organize ourselves and through what channels do we communicate within a production process to generate Big Data that combines data from technologies and the perception, comprehension, and projection of experienced humans? Our hypothesis suggests that the implementation of our model generates a continuous improvement system that could provide significant benefits to the company by connecting management with the place where the work happens (Gemba), streamlining multiple processes, thereby fostering sustainability. The developed model, “Group Situational Awareness Model”, was implemented in an operations management team, following the guidelines of an action researcher methodology. This resulted in the design of an operations management model and a detailed methodology for its implementation, achieving significant improvements in the metrics of the current process, making it a success story.

Suggested Citation

  • César Ortiz & Luis Quezada & Astrid Oddershede, 2024. "Industrial Process Management Model to Improve Productivity and Reduce Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1606-:d:1338999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.
    2. Tianjian Yang & Weiguo Fan, 2016. "Information management strategies and supply chain performance under demand disruptions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 8-27, January.
    3. Valentina De Simone & Valentina Di Pasquale & Maria Elena Nenni & Salvatore Miranda, 2023. "Sustainable Production Planning and Control in Manufacturing Contexts: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Célestin Elock Son, 2018. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research," Post-Print hal-03029453, HAL.
    2. Ben-Ammar, Oussama & Bettayeb, Belgacem & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Optimization of multi-period supply planning under stochastic lead times and a dynamic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 106-117.
    3. Yang, Honglin & Zhuo, Wenyan & Shao, Lusheng & Talluri, Srinivas, 2021. "Mean-variance analysis of wholesale price contracts with a capital-constrained retailer: Trade credit financing vs. bank credit financing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 525-542.
    4. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.
    5. Vaggelis Papachristos & Constantinos Antonopoulos & Nikolaos P. Rachaniotis & Dimitris Spontas & Thomas K. Dasaklis, 2023. "The Potential of ICT Adoption in Promoting Sustainable and Resilient Supply Chains: Evidence from Greek Logistics Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    7. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    8. Eileen Doctor & Torsten Eymann & Daniel Fürstenau & Martin Gersch & Kristina Hall & Anna Lina Kauffmann & Matthias Schulte-Althoff & Hannes Schlieter & Jeannette Stark & Katrin Wyrtki, 2023. "A Maturity Model for Assessing the Digitalization of Public Health Agencies," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(5), pages 539-554, October.
    9. Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 654-666.
    10. Konstantinos Liagkouras & Konstantinos Metaxiotis, 2023. "Sources of Uncertainty and Risk Quantification Methods in Supply Chain Management: A Literature Study," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-42, December.
    11. Meloni, Carlo & Pranzo, Marco & Samà, Marcella, 2022. "Evaluation of VaR and CVaR for the makespan in interval valued blocking job shops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    12. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    13. Rok Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Supply Chain Management Strategy on Operational and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Trapero, Juan R. & Cardós, Manuel & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2019. "Empirical safety stock estimation based on kernel and GARCH models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 199-211.
    15. Heiner Ackermann & Erik Diessel & Michael Helmling & Neil Jami & Johanna Münch, 2024. "Computing Optimal Mitigation Plans for Force-Majeure Scenarios in Dynamic Manufacturing Chains," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.
    16. Yingjie Fan & Frank Schwartz & Stefan Voß & David L. Woodruff, 2017. "Stochastic programming for flexible global supply chain planning," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 601-633, December.
    17. Wei Xu & Dong-Ping Song, 2022. "Integrated optimisation for production capacity, raw material ordering and production planning under time and quantity uncertainties based on two case studies," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2343-2371, July.
    18. Ribašauskienė, Erika & Volkov, Artiom & Morkūnas, Mangirdas & Žičkienė, Agnė & Dabkiene, Vida & Štreimikienė, Dalia & Baležentis, Tomas, 2024. "Strategies for increasing agricultural viability, resilience and sustainability amid disruptive events: An expert-based analysis of relevance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Adrian SOLOMON & Panagiotis KETIKIDIS & Felicia SIAVALAS, 2017. "Institutional Co-Creation Interfaces for Innovation Diffusion during Disaster Management," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(1), pages 77-95, March.
    20. Eryarsoy, Enes & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk & Zaim, Selim & Doszhanova, Marzhan, 2022. "Assessing IoT challenges in supply chain: A comparative study before and during- COVID-19 using interval valued neutrosophic analytical hierarchy process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 108-123.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1606-:d:1338999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.