IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p585-d1316034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review: Construction and Demolition Waste as a Novel Source for CO 2 Reduction in Portland Cement Production for Concrete

Author

Listed:
  • Kubilay Kaptan

    (Center for Territory, Environment and Construction (CTAC), Department of Civil Engineering, Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Sandra Cunha

    (Center for Territory, Environment and Construction (CTAC), Department of Civil Engineering, Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • José Aguiar

    (Center for Territory, Environment and Construction (CTAC), Department of Civil Engineering, Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

There is an increasing global recognition of the need for environmental sustainability in mitigating the adverse impacts of cement production. Despite the implementation of various carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) mitigation strategies in the cement industry, such as waste heat recovery, the use of alternative raw materials and alternative fuels, energy efficiency improvements, and carbon capture and storage, overall emissions have still increased due to the higher production levels. The resolution of this matter can be efficiently achieved by the substitution of traditional materials with an alternative material, such as calcined clay (CC), construction and demolition waste (CDW), which have a significant impact on various areas of sustainable development, including environmental, economic, and social considerations. The primary objectives of employing CDW in the Portland cement production are twofold: firstly, to mitigate the release of CO 2 into the atmosphere, as it is a significant contributor to environmental pollution and climate change; and secondly, to optimize the utilization of waste materials, thereby addressing the challenges associated with their disposal. The purpose of this work is to present a thorough examination of the existing body of literature pertaining to the partial replacement of traditional raw materials by CDW and the partial replacement of Portland cement by CDW and to analyze the resulting impact on CO 2 emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kubilay Kaptan & Sandra Cunha & José Aguiar, 2024. "A Review: Construction and Demolition Waste as a Novel Source for CO 2 Reduction in Portland Cement Production for Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-50, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:585-:d:1316034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/585/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/585/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Worrell, Ernst & Martin, Nathan & Price, Lynn, 2000. "Potentials for energy efficiency improvement in the US cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 1189-1214.
    2. Bernardo, G. & Marroccoli, M. & Nobili, M. & Telesca, A. & Valenti, G.L., 2007. "The use of oil well-derived drilling waste and electric arc furnace slag as alternative raw materials in clinker production," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 95-102.
    3. Thomas, Blessen Skariah, 2018. "Green concrete partially comprised of rice husk ash as a supplementary cementitious material – A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3913-3923.
    4. Ren, Ming & Ma, Teng & Fang, Chen & Liu, Xiaorui & Guo, Chaoyi & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Zhu, Yanlei & Dai, Hancheng & Huang, Chen, 2023. "Negative emission technology is key to decarbonizing China's cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    5. Kermeli, Katerina & Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. & Crijns-Graus, Wina & van Ruijven, Bas J. & Mima, Silvana & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Worrell, Ernst, 2019. "The scope for better industry representation in long-term energy models: Modeling the cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 964-985.
    6. Navia, R. & Rivela, B. & Lorber, K.E. & Méndez, R., 2006. "Recycling contaminated soil as alternative raw material in cement facilities: Life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 339-356.
    7. Shi, Caijun & Zheng, Keren, 2007. "A review on the use of waste glasses in the production of cement and concrete," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 234-247.
    8. Kantorek, Marcin & Jesionek, Krzysztof & Polesek-Karczewska, Sylwia & Ziółkowski, Paweł & Stajnke, Michał & Badur, Janusz, 2021. "Thermal utilization of meat-and-bone meal using the rotary kiln pyrolyzer and the fluidized bed boiler – The performance of pilot-scale installation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1447-1456.
    9. Shuit, S.H. & Tan, K.T. & Lee, K.T. & Kamaruddin, A.H., 2009. "Oil palm biomass as a sustainable energy source: A Malaysian case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1225-1235.
    10. Song, Dan & Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed, 2016. "Life-cycle environmental impact analysis of a typical cement production chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 916-923.
    11. Carvalho, S.Z. & Vernilli, F. & Almeida, B. & Demarco, M. & Silva, S.N., 2017. "The recycling effect of BOF slag in the portland cement properties," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 216-220.
    12. Rissman, Jeffrey & Bataille, Chris & Masanet, Eric & Aden, Nate & Morrow, William R. & Zhou, Nan & Elliott, Neal & Dell, Rebecca & Heeren, Niko & Huckestein, Brigitta & Cresko, Joe & Miller, Sabbie A., 2020. "Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    13. Essossinam Beguedou & Satyanarayana Narra & Ekua Afrakoma Armoo & Komi Agboka & Mani Kongnine Damgou, 2023. "Alternative Fuels Substitution in Cement Industries for Improved Energy Efficiency and Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, April.
    14. Pardo, Nicolás & Moya, José Antonio & Mercier, Arnaud, 2011. "Prospective on the energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the EU cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3244-3254.
    15. Ghalandari, Vahab & Majd, Mahdieh Mozaffari & Golestanian, Amir, 2019. "Energy audit for pyro-processing unit of a new generation cement plant and feasibility study for recovering waste heat: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 833-843.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Afshari, Fatemeh & Mahmoudkhani, Mahdi & Masoumi, Amirali & Esmaeili Bidhendi, Mehdi, 2025. "Waste heat recovery by thermodynamic cycles in cement plants: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Zhi & Shen, Lei & Zhao, Jianan & Liu, Litao & Zhong, Shuai & Yang, Yan, 2016. "Modeling the dynamic mechanism between cement CO2 emissions and clinker quality to realize low-carbon cement," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 116-126.
    2. Golmohamadi, Hessam, 2022. "Demand-side management in industrial sector: A review of heavy industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Talaei, Alireza & Pier, David & Iyer, Aishwarya V. & Ahiduzzaman, Md & Kumar, Amit, 2019. "Assessment of long-term energy efficiency improvement and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation options for the cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1051-1066.
    4. Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Vujanović, Milan & Duić, Neven, 2013. "Reducing the CO2 emissions in Croatian cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 41-48.
    5. Huh, Sung-Yoon & Lee, Hyejin & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Donghyun & Jang, Jinyoung, 2018. "Inter-fuel substitution path analysis of the korea cement industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4091-4099.
    6. Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Vujanović, Milan & Fidaros, Dimitris K. & Priesching, Peter & Minić, Ivica & Tatschl, Reinhard & Duić, Neven & Stefanović, Gordana, 2012. "The application of CFD modelling to support the reduction of CO2 emissions in cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 464-473.
    7. Xiaoquan Gao & Cuiping Liao & Xiaoling Qi & Yulong Zhang, 2023. "A Scenario Simulation of Material Substitution in the Cement Industry under the Carbon Neutral Strategy: A Case Study of Guangdong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Tesema, Gudise & Worrell, Ernst, 2015. "Energy efficiency improvement potentials for the cement industry in Ethiopia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2042-2052.
    9. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Foley, Aoife M. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the glass industry: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Huang, Lizhen & Krigsvoll, Guri & Johansen, Fred & Liu, Yongping & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2018. "Carbon emission of global construction sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1906-1916.
    11. Griffiths, Steve & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Foley, Aoife M. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Uratani, Joao M., 2023. "Decarbonizing the cement and concrete industry: A systematic review of socio-technical systems, technological innovations, and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    12. Söğüt, Z. & Oktay, Z. & Karakoc, H. & Hepbasli, A., 2012. "Investigation of environmental and exergetic performance for coal-preparation units in cement production processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 72-77.
    13. Kusuma, Ravi Teja & Hiremath, Rahul B. & Rajesh, Pachimatla & Kumar, Bimlesh & Renukappa, Suresh, 2022. "Sustainable transition towards biomass-based cement industry: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Poon, Chi Sun & Lo, Irene M.C. & Cheng, Jack C.P., 2017. "Comparative LCA on using waste materials in the cement industry: A Hong Kong case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 199-208.
    15. Fábio T. F. Silva & Alexandre Szklo & Amanda Vinhoza & Ana Célia Nogueira & André F. P. Lucena & Antônio Marcos Mendonça & Camilla Marcolino & Felipe Nunes & Francielle M. Carvalho & Isabela Tagomori , 2022. "Inter-sectoral prioritization of climate technologies: insights from a Technology Needs Assessment for mitigation in Brazil," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 1-39, October.
    16. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2022. "Liquid air as an emerging energy vector towards carbon neutrality: A multi-scale systems perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Mayyas Alsalman & Vian Ahmed & Zied Bahroun & Sara Saboor, 2023. "An Economic Analysis of Solar Energy Generation Policies in the UAE," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Farel, Romain & Yannou, Bernard & Ghaffari, Asma & Leroy, Yann, 2013. "A cost and benefit analysis of future end-of-life vehicle glazing recycling in France: A systematic approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 54-65.
    19. Viktoria Mannheim & Weronika Kruszelnicka, 2022. "Energy-Model and Life Cycle-Model for Grinding Processes of Limestone Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:585-:d:1316034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.