IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11310-d1550967.html

Local Food Production Based on Culinary Heritage—A Way to Local Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Luiza Ossowska

    (Department of Economics, Koszalin University of Technology, 75-343 Koszalin, Poland)

  • Dorota Janiszewska

    (Department of Economics, Koszalin University of Technology, 75-343 Koszalin, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Kwiatkowski

    (Department of Economics, Koszalin University of Technology, 75-343 Koszalin, Poland)

  • Ove Oklevik

    (HVL Business School, Faculty of Technology, Environmental and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Røyrgata 6, 6856 Sogndal, Norway
    Department of Marketing, Management and Finance Institute, WSB Merito University in Gdansk, Al. Grunwaldzka 238A, 80-266 Gdansk, Poland)

Abstract

This research assess the role of traditional food producers’ activities in fostering local sustainability in Poland. The study was carried out at the turn of 2021 and 2022, involving a sample of 70 traditional food producers. It utilized semi-structured interviews, which included two categories of questions: the characteristics of traditional food producers and the significance of their operational goals. Given the unique nature of traditional food in Poland, producers can be categorized into three groups, based on their connection to tradition: local, regional, and national. Differences among these groups were analyzed using a series of t -tests. The findings indicate that in the hierarchy of goals for traditional food producers, socio-cultural objectives take precedence, followed by business goals, while goals related to food safety, quality, and environmental responsibility rank as the least important, with significant differences noted. Producers associated with local traditions, predominantly consisting of family businesses, show the least interest in achieving food safety, quality, and environmental responsibility objectives. While traditional food producers in Poland are adopting pro-ecological practices, these are primarily driven by business considerations and market demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski & Ove Oklevik, 2024. "Local Food Production Based on Culinary Heritage—A Way to Local Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11310-:d:1550967
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11310/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11310/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Adomako & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah & Albert Danso & Renata Konadu & Samuel Owusu‐Agyei, 2019. "Environmental sustainability orientation and performance of family and nonfamily firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1250-1259, September.
    2. Dauro Mattia Zocchi & Michele Filippo Fontefrancesco & Paolo Corvo & Andrea Pieroni, 2021. "Recognising, Safeguarding, and Promoting Food Heritage: Challenges and Prospects for the Future of Sustainable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski & Dariusz Kloskowski & Ove Oklevik, 2024. "Traditional Food Vendor-Producer Innovation Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Bae-Young Choi & Su Jin Yang, 2024. "Sustainability of Food Heritage in Birthday Rituals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Albert Danso & Samuel Adomako & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah & Samuel Owusu‐Agyei & Renata Konadu, 2019. "Environmental sustainability orientation, competitive strategy and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 885-895, July.
    6. Angela Tregear, 2005. "Lifestyle, growth, or community involvement? The balance of goals of UK artisan food producers," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreea Virginia Cenusa & Felix Horatiu Arion, 2026. "Romania Between Heritage and Certification: Consumer Perception of Traditional and Local Agri-Food Products with Certification Potential," Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 1, pages 70-100.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenzo Dal Maso & Rodrigo Basco & Thomas Bassetti & Nicola Lattanzi, 2020. "Family ownership and environmental performance: The mediation effect of human resource practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1548-1562, March.
    2. Christopher Durugbo & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2019. "Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1500-1516, November.
    3. Usman Khizar, Hafiz Muhammad & Iqbal, Muhammad Jawad & Khalid, Junaid & Adomako, Samuel, 2022. "Addressing the conceptualization and measurement challenges of sustainability orientation: A systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 718-743.
    4. Claudia Dias & Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues & João J. Ferreira, 2022. "Linking natural resources and performance of small agricultural businesses: Do entrepreneurial orientation and environmental sustainability orientation matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 713-725, August.
    5. Charatsari, Chrysanthi & Michailidis, Anastasios & Lioutas, Evagelos D., 2024. "Do farm advisory organizations promote sustainability? A study in Greece," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    6. Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah & Johnny Syllias, 2020. "Can adopting ambitious environmental sustainability initiatives lead to business failures? An analytical framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 240-249, January.
    7. Marcin Nowak & Robert Zajkowski & Marta Pawłowska-Nowak, 2025. "Prediction of the Sustainability Index in Family Firms Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-30, August.
    8. Frederick Ahen & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah, 2021. "Sustainable Waste Management Innovations in Africa: New Perspectives and Research Agenda for Improving Global Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Patricia Elgoibar & Elio Shijaku, 2022. "Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    10. Anass Hamad Elneel Adow & M. M. Safeer & Rufida Gamr Eldoula Moahmed Ibrahim & M. Syeed Alam, 2024. "An Examination of a Few Antecedents of Environmental Sustainability Using Structural Equation Modelling," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 562-573, July.
    11. Villegas Pinuer, Francisco & Valenzuela Fernández, Leslier & Llonch Andreu, Joan & López Belbeze, Pilar, 2022. "Environmental sustainability and their factors in SMEs: A multiple case study of Spain and Chile," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    12. M. M. Sulphey & Shaha Faisal, 2021. "Connectedness to Nature and Environmental Concern as Antecedents of Commitment to Environmental Sustainability," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 208-219.
    13. Christoph Stock & Laura Pütz & Sabrina Schell & Arndt Werner, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Family Firms: Status and Future Directions of a Research Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 199-259, February.
    14. Singh, Gurmeet & Sharma, Shavneet & Sharma, Rashmini & Dwivedi, Yogesh K, 2021. "Investigating environmental sustainability in small family-owned businesses: Integration of religiosity, ethical judgment, and theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    15. Lirios Alos-Simo & Antonio J. Verdu-Jover & Jose M. Gomez-Gras, 2020. "Knowledge Transfer in Sustainable Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Periods of Financial Recession and Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    16. Mensah Marfo & Abiel Ashitey ARMAH & Eleazer Fianko Ofei & Isaac Sewornu Coffie & Linda Adadevoh & Sanjeet Kumar Pattnaik & Carl Asante Reindoph & Edward Annan, 2024. "Competitive advantage and sustainability in Ghanaian microfinance institutions: the mediating role of strategic capabilities," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Andrea Lučić, 2020. "Measuring Sustainable Marketing Orientation—Scale Development Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Yuanyuan Hu & Shouming Chen & Wenchuan Huang, 2023. "Does the market value sustainable supply chain management? New evidence from the outbreak of COVID-19," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(2), pages 366-387, May.
    19. Dru Montri & Kimberly Chung & Bridget Behe, 2021. "Farmer perspectives on farmers markets in low-income urban areas: a case study in three Michigan cities," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Yefan Nian & R. David Lamie & Michael Vassalos & Daniel Tregeagle & Ben Boyles & Diana Vossbrinck, 2025. "A Diamond in the Rough: Identifying Heritage Crop Niche Markets in the United States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(6), pages 940-960, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11310-:d:1550967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.