IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10992-d1543985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Zoning Study on the Coupling of Land Use Intensity and Landscape Ecological Risk in Western Jilin: A Production–Living–Ecological Space Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Su Rina

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Yi Bole

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Zhijun Tong

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Feng Zhi

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Jiarong Xu

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Bing Ma

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Xingpeng Liu

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Jiquan Zhang

    (School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

Ecological zoning is essential for optimizing regional ecological management and improving environmental protection efficiency. While previous studies have primarily focused on the independent analysis of land use intensity (LUI) and landscape ecological risk (LER), there has been limited research on their coupled relationship. This study, conducted in the Western Jilin (WJL), introduces an innovative ecological zoning method based on the Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) framework, which explores the interactions between LUI and LER, filling a gap in existing research. The method employs a coupling coordination degree (CCD) model and Geographic Information System (GIS) technology to construct an LUI-ERI coupling model, which is used to delineate ecological zones. The results indicate that: (1) The PLES in the study area is predominantly production space (PS), with the largest area of transfer being production ecological space (PES) 2784.23 km 2 , and the most significant transfer in being PS 3112.33 km 2 . (2) Between 2000 and 2020, both LUI and LER exhibited downward trends, with opposite spatial distribution characteristics. The “middle” intensity zone and “highest” risk zone were the dominant LUI and LER types, covering approximately 46% and 45% of the total area, respectively. (3) The coupling coordination degree between LUI and LER showed a polarized trend, with an overall upward trajectory from 2000 to 2020. (4) The ecological zoning of the WJL can be categorized into an ecological core protection (ECP) zone, ecological potential governance (EPG) zone, ecological comprehensive monitoring (ECM) zone, ecological optimization (EO) zone, and ecological restoration (ER) zone, with the ecological core protection area occupying 61.63% of the total area. This study provides a novel perspective on ecological zoning and offers a systematic scientific basis for regional ecological management and spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Su Rina & Yi Bole & Zhijun Tong & Feng Zhi & Jiarong Xu & Bing Ma & Xingpeng Liu & Jiquan Zhang, 2024. "Ecological Zoning Study on the Coupling of Land Use Intensity and Landscape Ecological Risk in Western Jilin: A Production–Living–Ecological Space Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10992-:d:1543985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuxin Qi & Ruoyu Wang & Peixin Shen & Shu Ren & Yuandong Hu, 2023. "Impacts of Land Use Intensity on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in Harbin City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Xiaoyan Jiang & Boyu Wang & Qinhua Fang & Peiyuan Bai & Ting Guo & Qi Wu, 2024. "Ecological Zoning Management Strategies in China: A Perspective of Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Zhang, Shouguo & Zhang, Jianjun & Sha, Anmeng & Zhang, Yaping & Zhang, Di, 2023. "How to recognize the role of policy clusters in built-up land intensity: An empirical case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Canelas, Joana Viana & Pereira, Henrique Miguel, 2022. "Impacts of land-use intensity on ecosystems stability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    5. Tian, Fenghao & Li, Mingyu & Han, Xulong & Liu, Hui & Mo, Boxian, 2020. "A Production–Living–Ecological Space Model for Land-Use Optimisation: A case study of the core Tumen River region in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    6. Duan, Yaming & Wang, Hui & Huang, An & Xu, Yueqing & Lu, Longhui & Ji, Zhengxin, 2021. "Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’ behavior – A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    7. Xie, Yuqi & Wang, Shu & Xiang, Shujiang & Wang, Zifang & Li, Yanyun & Wang, Zhongshu & Zhou, Mi & Wang, Ying & Gao, Ming, 2024. "Ecological zoning and dynamic assessment of effectiveness in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 487(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Di Zhan & Bin Quan & Jia Liao, 2025. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coupling Coordination of LUCC and Landscape Ecological Risk in Ecologically Vulnerable Areas: A Case Study of the Wanzhou–Dazhou–Kaizhou Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanqiong Zhao & Jinhua Cheng & Yongguang Zhu & Yanpu Zhao, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Regional Differences in the Production-Living-Ecological Space of the Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Dunlap, J. & Schramski, J.R., 2024. "Energy-systems accounting in industrial-natural systems; An energy analysis of a managed forest ecosystem including food web biomass dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 488(C).
    3. Changchun Feng & Hao Zhang & Liang Xiao & Yongpei Guo, 2022. "Land Use Change and Its Driving Factors in the Rural–Urban Fringe of Beijing: A Production–Living–Ecological Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Jin Guo & Xiaojian Wei & Fuqing Zhang & Yubo Ding, 2025. "Coupled Assessment of Land Use Changes and Ecological Benefits Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Zhang, Shouguo & Zhang, Jianjun & Dai, Yixin & Zhang, Ling, 2025. "Mitigating conflicts in the implementation of intensive land use policies: Insights from a tripartite evolutionary game model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    6. Qiyuan Zhou & Qiuping Zhu & Yu Feng & Jinman Wang, 2025. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration at a Small Watershed Scale: A Case Study in Dali Prefecture of Yunnan Province in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, June.
    7. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Zhe Zhao & Xiangzheng Deng & Fan Zhang & Zhihui Li & Wenjiao Shi & Zhigang Sun & Xuezhen Zhang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Livestock Carrying Capacity Risk in Farmland from the Perspective of Planting and Breeding Balance in Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Jianchun Fu & Shaoliang Zhang, 2021. "Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function—A Case Study of Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Yu Chen & Xuyang Su & Xuekai Wang, 2022. "Spatial Transformation Characteristics and Conflict Measurement of Production-Living-Ecology: Evidence from Urban Agglomeration of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Jingjie Liu & Min Xia, 2023. "Influencing Factors Analysis and Optimization of Land Use Allocation: Combining MAS with MOPSO Procedure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Rui Bai & Ying Shi & Ying Pan, 2022. "Land-Use Classifying and Identification of the Production-Living-Ecological Space of Island Villages—A Case Study of Islands in the Western Sea Area of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Shanfeng Wu & Wenbo Mo & Runlei Zhang & Xuan Xiao & E Li & Xi Liu & Nan Yang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Production–Living–Ecological Space from 1990 to 2020 in Hunan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Yanlan Xie & Xiaobo Liu & Xiaoshuang Zhuo & Shaoyao Zhang & Hao Zhang, 2025. "The Integration of Land Use Planning and the Varied Responses of Coupled Human–Natural Systems: A Case Study of Changning County in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Ziwei Luo & Xijun Hu & Yezi Wang & Cunyou Chen, 2023. "Simulation and Prediction of Territorial Spatial Layout at the Lake-Type Basin Scale: A Case Study of the Dongting Lake Basin in China from 2000 to 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Jia Jia & Enhui Jiang & Shimin Tian & Bo Qu & Jieyu Li & Lingang Hao & Chang Liu & Yongcai Jing, 2025. "Land-Use Transformation and Its Eco-Environmental Effects of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on the County Level in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Weisong Li & Yi Zeng & Yelin Peng & Wanxu Chen & Ying Dong & Ziyan Ye & Yan Chen, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Mechanisms of the Global Production-Living-Ecological Space Coupling Coordination Degree," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Chunyang Zhang & Junjie Chen, 2023. "Spatial Morphology Optimization of Rural Planning Based on Space of Flow: An Empirical Study of Zepan Village in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Danning Xing & Tianyi Cai & Xiaosen Li & Shuo Dong & Hongen Hu & Yakai Lei & Yang Cao & Rongwei Wu, 2025. "The Process, Mechanism, and Effects of Rural “Production-Living-Ecological” Functions Transformation: A Case Study of Caiwu Village in Yuanyang County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, September.
    20. Lan Wang & Changwei Zhou, 2024. "Evaluation of Perceptions Using Facial Expression Scores on Ecological Service Value of Blue and Green Spaces in 61 Parks in Guizhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10992-:d:1543985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.