IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10674-d1537510.html

Educational Design in the Adoption of ICT for Sustainable Digital Learning in Social and Business Sciences: A Structural Equation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Mariela Carvajal-Morales

    (Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad Estatal de Milagro (UNEMI), 091050 Milagro, Ecuador)

  • Edwin Evaristo León-Plúas

    (Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad Estatal de Milagro (UNEMI), 091050 Milagro, Ecuador)

  • Juan Diego Valenzuela-Cobos

    (Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad Estatal de Milagro (UNEMI), 091050 Milagro, Ecuador)

  • Fabricio Guevara-Viejó

    (Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad Estatal de Milagro (UNEMI), 091050 Milagro, Ecuador)

Abstract

Currently, teaching and learning are significantly influenced by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), especially in a constantly evolving technological environment. The objective of this study was to develop a structural model to understand how university students use ICT for sustainable digital learning in the areas of social and business sciences. The study investigates the main factors influencing the acceptance of sustainable digital learning based on student satisfaction with the actual use of ICT. This research employs Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SEM-AMOS and utilizes a questionnaire based on the conceptual framework of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), its variants, and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) as the primary method of data collection, from which 728 valid responses were obtained. Student responses were classified into several constructs and evaluated to determine their satisfaction with ICT for sustainable digital learning. The findings revealed a significant connection between computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and perceived enjoyment towards perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, which in turn positively influenced student satisfaction with the use of ICT. This model proved effective in explaining student satisfaction and highlights the importance of deeply and strategically integrating ICT into educational design to promote digital learning as sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Mariela Carvajal-Morales & Edwin Evaristo León-Plúas & Juan Diego Valenzuela-Cobos & Fabricio Guevara-Viejó, 2024. "Educational Design in the Adoption of ICT for Sustainable Digital Learning in Social and Business Sciences: A Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10674-:d:1537510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10674/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10674/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J., 1995. "The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 587-605, December.
    2. Eirene Katsarou, 2021. "The Effects of Computer Anxiety and Self-Efficacy on L2 Learners’ Self-Perceived Digital Competence and Satisfaction in Higher Education," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(2), pages 158-172.
    3. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    4. Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Noraffandy Yahaya & Nasser Alalwan & Yusri Bin Kamin, 2020. "Digital Communication: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Usage for Education Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Eirene Katsarou, 2021. "The Effects of Computer Anxiety and Self-Efficacy on L2 Learners’ Self-Perceived Digital Competence and Satisfaction in Higher Education," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(2), pages 158-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianqi Lin & Jianyang Zhang & Bin Xiong, 2025. "Effects of Technology Perceptions, Teacher Beliefs, and AI Literacy on AI Technology Adoption in Sustainable Mathematics Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-35, April.
    2. Yan Luo & Lin Sun, 2025. "The Effects of Social and Spatial Presence on Learning Engagement in Sustainable E-Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Ali Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Alina Shamsuddin & Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh & Farahwahida Mohd Yusof & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Abdulmajeed A. Aljeraiwi, 2021. "The Influence of Information System Success and Technology Acceptance Model on Social Media Factors in Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    4. An, Siyang & Cheung, Chi Fai & Willoughby, Kelvin W., 2024. "A gamification approach for enhancing older adults' technology adoption and knowledge transfer: A case study in mobile payments technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    5. Irfan Bashir & C. Madhavaiah, 2014. "Determinants of Young Consumers’ Intention to Use Internet Banking Services in India," Vision, , vol. 18(3), pages 153-163, September.
    6. Samir Mirdasse, 2024. "Fondements théoriques d'utilisation des technologies de l'information et des systèmes d'information. Proposition d’un cadre intégrateur de groupe de variables clés," Post-Print hal-04853813, HAL.
    7. Shinyi Lin & Shueh-Fen Chen, 2013. "Innovation attributes and pedagogical quality: a concretization of joint theories on course management systems acceptance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2309-2317, June.
    8. Z Irani & Y K Dwivedi & M D Williams, 2009. "Understanding consumer adoption of broadband: an extension of the technology acceptance model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1322-1334, October.
    9. Kerstin Pezoldt & Jana Schliewe, 2012. "Akzeptanz von Self-Service-Technologien: State of the Art," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 205-253, March.
    10. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    11. Martínez-Torres, M.R. & Díaz-Fernández, M.C. & Toral, S.L. & Barrero, F., 2015. "The moderating role of prior experience in technological acceptance models for ubiquitous computing services in urban environments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 146-160.
    12. Amer Mutrik Sayaf & Mahdi Mohammed Alamri & Mohammed Ayid Alqahtani & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi, 2021. "Information and Communications Technology Used in Higher Education: An Empirical Study on Digital Learning as Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Guan Luo & Carlos Serrão & Decui Liang & Yang Zhou, 2023. "A Relevance-Based Technology–Organisation–Environment Model of Critical Success Factors for Digital Procurement Adoption in Chinese Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    14. Nazir Ullah & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & Osama Alfarraj & Fahad Mohammed Alblehai, 2021. "Blockchain Technology Adoption in Smart Learning Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Neill, William D. & Richard, James E., 2012. "Intranet portals: Marketing and managing individuals’ acceptance and use," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 147-157.
    16. Ali Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi & Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh & Sultan Almutairy & Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, 2021. "Exploring the Factors Affecting Mobile Learning for Sustainability in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Teo, Thompson S. H. & Lim, Vivien K. G. & Lai, Raye Y. C., 1999. "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 25-37, February.
    18. Ritu Agarwal & V. Sambamurthy & Ralph M. Stair, 2000. "Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 418-430, December.
    19. Seif Obeid Al-Shbiel & Muhannad Akram Ahmad, 2016. "A Theoretical Discussion of Electronic Banking in Jordan by Integrating Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(3), pages 272-284, July.
    20. Wai-Ming To & Peter K C Lee & King-Hang Lam, 2018. "Building professionals’ intention to use smart and sustainable building technologies – An empirical study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10674-:d:1537510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.