IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10601-d1535951.html

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Models for Resource Allocation in Circular Economy Digital Marketplace

Author

Listed:
  • Arifuzzaman (Arif) Sheikh

    (Department of Systems Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Steven J. Simske

    (Department of Systems Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Edwin K. P. Chong

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

Abstract

This study assesses the application of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for optimizing resource allocation, demand-supply matching, and dynamic pricing within circular economy (CE) digital marketplaces. Five AI models—autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), long short-term memory (LSTM), random forest (RF), gradient boosting regressor (GBR), and neural networks (NNs)—were evaluated based on their effectiveness in predicting waste generation, economic growth, and energy prices. The GBR model outperformed the others, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 23.39 and an R 2 of 0.7586 in demand forecasting, demonstrating strong potential for resource flow management. In contrast, the NNs encountered limitations in supply prediction, with an MAE of 121.86 and an R 2 of 0.0151, indicating challenges in adapting to market volatility. Reinforcement learning methods, specifically Q-learning and deep Q-learning (DQL), were applied for price stabilization, resulting in reduced price fluctuations and improved market stability. These findings contribute a conceptual framework for AI-driven CE marketplaces, showcasing the role of AI in enhancing resource efficiency and supporting sustainable urban development. While synthetic data enabled controlled experimentation, this study acknowledges its limitations in capturing full real-world variability, marking a direction for future research to validate findings with real-world data. Moreover, ethical considerations, such as algorithmic fairness and transparency, are critical for responsible AI integration in circular economy contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Arifuzzaman (Arif) Sheikh & Steven J. Simske & Edwin K. P. Chong, 2024. "Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Models for Resource Allocation in Circular Economy Digital Marketplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-39, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10601-:d:1535951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Onyeaka & Phemelo Tamasiga & Uju Mary Nwauzoma & Taghi Miri & Uche Chioma Juliet & Ogueri Nwaiwu & Adenike A. Akinsemolu, 2023. "Using Artificial Intelligence to Tackle Food Waste and Enhance the Circular Economy: Maximising Resource Efficiency and Minimising Environmental Impact: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Sean J. Taylor & Benjamin Letham, 2018. "Forecasting at Scale," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 37-45, January.
    3. Muhammad Salman Pathan & Edana Richardson & Edgar Galvan & Peter Mooney, 2023. "The Role of Artificial Intelligence within Circular Economy Activities—A View from Ireland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Julien Walzberg & Jean‐Marc Frayret & Annika L. Eberle & Alberta Carpenter & Garvin Heath, 2023. "Agent‐based modeling and simulation for the circular economy: Lessons learned and path forward," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(5), pages 1227-1238, October.
    5. Elizabeta Stamevska & Aleksandra Stankovska & Vasko Stamevski, 2020. "Principles Of The Circular Economy," Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 17(1), pages 99-107.
    6. Franck Galtier & François Bousquet & Martine Antona & Pierre Bommel, 2012. "Markets as communication systems," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 161-201, January.
    7. Veale, Michael & Binns, Reuben, 2017. "Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data," SocArXiv ustxg, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masoud Khakbazan & Hossein Ghanbari & Emran Mohammadi & Ronald Ravinesh Kumar & Amirhossein Ghasemi Abyaneh, 2026. "Exploring the role of AI-driven innovations in circular economy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 3177-3222, February.
    2. Zain Anwar Ali & Mahreen Zain & Raza Hasan & Hussain Al Salman & Bader Fahad Alkhamees & Faisal Abdulaziz Almisned, 2025. "Circular Economy Advances with Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin: Multiple-Case Study of Chinese Industries in Agriculture," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 2192-2228, March.
    3. Munir Shah & Mark Wever & Martin Espig, 2025. "A Framework for Assessing the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Circular Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-29, April.
    4. Xi, Yipeng & Mai, Luu Thuc Ngan, 2025. "Shifting tides: How public perceptions of GPT regulation evolved before and after GPT-4 on Quora," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    5. Fadaki, Masih & Asadikia, Atie, 2024. "Augmenting Monte Carlo Tree Search for managing service level agreements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    6. Miroslav Navratil & Andrea Kolkova, 2019. "Decomposition and Forecasting Time Series in the Business Economy Using Prophet Forecasting Model," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(4), pages 26-39.
    7. Yu, Dejian & Xiang, Bo, 2024. "An ESTs detection research based on paper entity mapping: Combining scientific text modeling and neural prophet," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    8. Andrea Kolková, 2024. "Data Analysis in Demand Forecasting: A Case Study of Poetry Book Sales in the European Area," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(5), pages 51-69.
    9. Zhewei Huang & Yawen Yi, 2024. "Short-Term Load Forecasting for Regional Smart Energy Systems Based on Two-Stage Feature Extraction and Hybrid Inverted Transformer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-25, September.
    10. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    11. Tashreef Muhammad & Tahsin Ahmed & Meherun Farzana & Md. Mahmudul Hasan & Abrar Eyasir & Md. Emon Khan & Mahafuzul Islam Shawon & Ferdous Mondol & Mahmudul Hasan & Muhammad Ibrahim, 2026. "A Benchmark of Classical and Deep Learning Models for Agricultural Commodity Price Forecasting on A Novel Bangladeshi Market Price Dataset," Papers 2604.06227, arXiv.org.
    12. Md. Iftekharul Alam Efat & Petr Hajek & Mohammad Zoynul Abedin & Rahat Uddin Azad & Md. Al Jaber & Shuvra Aditya & Mohammad Kabir Hassan, 2024. "Deep-learning model using hybrid adaptive trend estimated series for modelling and forecasting sales," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(1), pages 297-328, August.
    13. Belaïd, Fateh & Hejazi, Mohamad, 2026. "Closing the clean cooking gap in Ghana and Kenya: Access trajectories, costs, and policy," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Jayesh Thaker & Robert Höller, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Time Series Forecasting of Solar Energy Based on Irradiance Classification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Srinka Basu & Sugata Sen, 2023. "COVID 19 Pandemic, Socio-Economic Behaviour and Infection Characteristics: An Inter-Country Predictive Study Using Deep Learning," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 645-676, February.
    16. Apostolos Giannoulidis & Anastasios Gounaris & Athanasios Naskos & Nikodimos Nikolaidis & Daniel Caljouw, 2025. "Engineering and evaluating an unsupervised predictive maintenance solution: a cold-forming press case-study," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2121-2139, March.
    17. Daniel Nijloveanu & Victor Tița & Nicolae Bold & Doru Anastasiu Popescu & Dragoș Smedescu & Cosmina Smedescu & Gina Fîntîneru, 2024. "The Development of a Prediction Model Related to Food Loss and Waste in Consumer Segments of Agrifood Chain Using Machine Learning Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, October.
    18. Yinghui Huang & Hui Liu & Lin Zhang & Shen Li & Weijun Wang & Zhihong Ren & Zongkui Zhou & Xueyao Ma, 2021. "The Psychological and Behavioral Patterns of Online Psychological Help-Seekers before and during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Text Mining-Based Longitudinal Ecological Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Putthiphan Hirunyatrakul, 2025. "Hybrid Intersection: Navigating Context and Constraint in AI for Social Good Among Thailand’s Smallholder Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-37, June.
    20. Oras Baker & Zahra Ziran & Massimo Mecella & Kasthuri Subaramaniam & Sellappan Palaniappan, 2025. "Predictive Modeling for Pandemic Forecasting: A COVID-19 Study in New Zealand and Partner Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(4), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10601-:d:1535951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.